In the Drapebot project, a worker collaborates with a large industrial manipulator in two tasks: collaborative transport of carbon fibre patches and collaborative draping.

Data collection

At Dallara, each participant was introduced to the robot work cell and received verbal instructions on how to perform the collaborative draping task. Each participant performed the task ten times. The ten tasks were performed with the same cut piece. Once the draping along the mould was complete, the participant would return the cut piece to the pick-up table before signaling the robot to continue by raising their hand (gesture condition). After 10 task repetitions, the participants filled out the questionnaire battery.

Data organization

The data consists of an Excel file with six sheets:

1. SUS: Results from Standard Usability Scale (Brooke et al. 1996)

• Column 1: Test site
• Column 2: participant ID
• Column 3: User interface type (Gesture)
• Column 4-13: SUS items
• Column 14: SUS score between 1-100

2. UMUX: Results from Usability Metric for User Experience (Finstad 2010)

• Column 1: Test site
• Column 2: participant ID
• Column 3: User interface type (Gesture)
• Column 4-7: UMUX items
• Column 8: UMUX score between 1-100

3. Trust: Results from Trust perception scale - HRI (Schaefer 2016)

• Column 1: Test site
• Column 2: participant ID
• Column 3: User interface type (Gesture)
• Column 4-17: Questionnaire items
• Column 8: Trust score between 1-100

4. Trust: Results from Trust in industrial human robot collaboration (Charalambous, et.al. 2016)

• Column 1: Test site
• Column 2: participant ID
• Column 3: User interface type (Gesture)
• Column 4-13: Questionnaire items
• Column 8: Trust score between 1-100

5. NASA TLX: Results from Task Load Index (Hart 1986)

• Column 1: Test site
• Column 2: participant ID
• Column 3-20: Questionnaire items
• Column 21: TLX score between 1-100

6. UTAUT: Results from Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (Venkatesh et al. 2003)

• Column 1: Test site
• Column 2: participant ID
• Column 3-33: Questionnaire items
• Column 34-41: Subcategory scores from 1-100

References:

J. Brooke et al., “Sus-a quick and dirty usability scale,” Usability evaluation in industry, vol. 189, no. 194, pp. 4–7, 1996

G. Charalambous, S. Fletcher, and P. Webb, “The development of a scale to evaluate trust in industrial human-robot collaboration,” International Journal of Social Robotics, vol. 8, pp. 193–209, 2016.

S. G. Hart, “Nasa task load index (tlx),” 1986.

K. Finstad, “The usability metric for user experience,” Interacting with computers, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 323–327, 2010

K. E. Schaefer, Measuring Trust in Human Robot Interactions: Development of the “Trust Perception Scale-HRI”. Boston, MA: Springer US, 2016, pp. 191–218.

V. Venkatesh, M. G. Morris, G. B. Davis, and F. D. Davis, “User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view,” MIS quarterly, pp. 425–478, 2003.