Published October 3, 2023
| Version v1
Publication
Open
Assessment of users' behavior in Lithuanian online communities
Authors/Creators
Files
fpsyg-14-1265341.pdf
Files
(1.9 MB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:39e9356b6e40088ace89dc456f266460
|
1.9 MB | Preview Download |
Additional details
Identifiers
Related works
- Is continued by
- Publication: 10.1111/ejed.12732 (DOI)
Funding
References
- Abedin, B., Maloney, B., and Watson, J. (2019). Benefits and challenges associated with using online communities by social enterprises: a thematic analysis of qualitative interviews. J. Soc. Entrep. 12, 197–218. doi: 10.1080/19420676.2019.1683879 CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar Ardichvili, A., Page, V., and Wentling, T. (2003). Motivation and barriers to participating in virtual knowledge-sharing communities of practice. J. Knowl. Manag. 7, 64–77. doi: 10.1108/13673270310463626 CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar Baek, S. I., and Kim, Y. M. (2015). Longitudinal analysis of online community dynamics. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 115, 661–677. doi: 10.1108/IMDS-09-2014-0266 CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar Bateman, P. J., Gray, P. H., and Butler, B. S. (2011). Research note-the impact of community commitment on participation in online communities. Inf. Syst. Res. 22, 841–854. doi: 10.1287/isre.1090.0265 CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar Berchtold, A. (2016). Test–retest: agreement or reliability? Methodol. Innov. 9:205979911667287. doi: 10.1177/2059799116672875 CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar Bizzotto, N., Morlino, S., and Schulz, P. J. (2022). Misinformation in Italian online mental health communities during the COVID-19 pandemic: protocol for a content analysis study. JMIR Res. Protoc. 11:e35347. doi: 10.2196/35347 PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar Chen, L. (2022). Designing online discussion for HyFlex learning. Int. J. Educ. Methodol. 8, 191–198. doi: 10.12973/ijem.8.1.191 CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar Chou, M., and Frank, J. (2018). Designing of online communities of practice to facilitate collaborative learning. In 2018 5th international symposium on emerging trends and Technologies in Libraries and Information Services (ETTLIS) (pp. 100–104). Google Scholar Chua, Z., Goh, K. Y., Kankanhalli, A., and Phang, C. W. (2007). Investigating participation in online policy discussion forums over time: does network structure matter. Proceedings of international conference on information systems, Montreal. Google Scholar Civil Society Institute (2021). Civic Power Index 2021. Available at: http://www.civitas.lt/wp-content/uploads/2021/06/PGI_2020metai_visas.pdf Google Scholar Debaere, S., Coussement, K., and De Ruyck, T. (2018). Multi-label classification of member participation in online innovation communities. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 270, 761–774. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2018.03.039 CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar Ehrlich, K., Muller, M., Matthews, T., Guy, I., and Ronen, I. (2014). What motivates members to contribute to enterprise online communities? Proceedings of the companion publication of the 17th ACM conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, 149–152. Google Scholar European Commission (2022) Digital economy and society index : Lithuania. European Commission Google Scholar Fedushko, S., Syerov, Y., and Korzh, R. (2016). Validation of the user accounts personal data of online academic community. In 2016 13th international conference on modern problems of radio engineering, telecommunications and computer science (TCSET). (pp. 863–866). IEEE Google Scholar Füller, J., Jawecki, G., and Mühlbacher, H. (2007). Innovation creation by online basketball communities. J. Bus. Res. 60, 60–71. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.09.019 CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar Fullwood, C., Chadwick, D., Keep, M., Attrill-Smith, A., Asbury, T., and Kirwan, G. (2019). Lurking towards empowerment: explaining propensity to engage with online health support groups and its association with positive outcomes. Comput. Hum. Behav. 90, 131–140. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2018.08.037 CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar Guo, J., and Fussell, S. R. (2022). It's great to exercise together on zoom!': Understanding the practices and challenges of live stream group fitness classes. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 6, 1–28. doi: 10.1145/3512918 CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar Herbert, C. (2012). Six strategies for creating a successful online community. Available at: https://www.techtarget.com/wp-content/uploads/files/research/BP_SuccessfulOnlineCommunity.pdf (accessed March 25, 2022). Google Scholar Horrigan, J. (2001). Online communities summary of findings: the vibrant social universe online. Pew Internet =American Life Proj. 21, 1928–1946. doi: 10.1177/1461444819834509 CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar Imroz, S. M. (2019). Motives to participate in an online community for professionals: lessons from service now customer service community. J. Work. Learn. 31, 498–519. doi: 10.1108/JWL-02-2019-0021 CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar Kėrytė, Ž. (2010). Pilietiškumo konstravimas globalumo kontekste: NVO vaidmens kaita Lietuvoje. Kultūra ir visuomenė 1, 67–83. Google Scholar Larijani, F., and Sravi-Moghadam, N. (2017). Factors affecting promoting of citizenship culture and integration. Int. J. Knowl. Manag. 1:208. doi: 10.1504/IJKMTH.2017.085868 CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar Lăzăroiu, G., and Adams, C. (2020). Viral panic and contagious fear in scary times: the proliferation of COVID-19 misinformation and fake news. Anal. Metaphys. 19, 80–86. doi: 10.22381/AM1920209 CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar Lee, Y. J. (2022). Social media capital and civic engagement: does type of connection matter? Int. Rev. Public Nonprofit Mark. 19, 167–189. doi: 10.1007/s12208-021-00300-8 CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar Lykourentzou, I., Vergados, D. J., Kapetanios, E., and Loumos, V. (2011). Collective intelligence systems: classification and modelling. J. Emerg. Technol. Web Intell. 3, 217–226. doi: 10.4304/jetwi.3.3.217-226 CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar Mansour, A., and Francke, H. (2021). Collective Privacy Management Practices: A Study of Privacy Strategies and Risks in a Private Facebook Group. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 5, 1–27. doi: 10.1145/3479504 CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar Marček, E. (2008). Dialog między władzą i organizacjami pozarządowymi na Słowacji – lata 1992 – 2008. Organizacje pozarządowe i władza publiczna: Warszawa. Google Scholar Preece, J. (2001). Sociability and usability in online communities: determining and measuring success. Behav. Inform. Technol. 20, 347–356. doi: 10.1080/01449290110084683 CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar Purdy, S. J. (2017). Internet use and civic engagement: a structural equation approach. Comput. Hum. Behav. 71, 318–326. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.011 CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar Sireci, S. G. (1998). The construct of content validity. Soc. Indic. Res. 45, 83–117. doi: 10.1023/A:1006985528729 CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar Skaržauskienė, A., and Mačiulienė, M. (2016). Emergence of collective intelligence in online communities. J. Bus. Res. 69, 1718–1724. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.848048 CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar Sproull, L., and Arriaga, M. (2007). "Online communities" in Handbook of computer networks: Distributed networks, network planning, control, management, and new trends and applications. ed. H. Bidgoli (Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons) Google Scholar Swart, K., and Bond-Barnard, T. (2022). Challenges and critical success factors of digital communication, collaboration and knowledge sharing in project management virtual teams: a review. Int. J. Inf. Syst. Proj. Manag. 10, 59–75. doi: 10.12821/ijispm100404 CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar Thomas, L., Poncin, I., Hammadi, W., Kullak, A., and Hollebeek, L. D. (2020). When gamification backfires: the impact of perceived justice on online community contributions. J. Mark. Manag. 36, 550–577. doi: 10.1080/0267257X.2020.1736604 CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar Tijunaitiene and Bersenaitė (2013). Dalyvavimo pilietinės visuomenės organizacijų veikloje motyvacijos pokyčiai. Ekon. vadyb. aktual. perspekt. 4, 134–147. Google Scholar Vohra, A., and Bhardwaj, N. (2019). From active participation to engagement in online communities: Analysing the mediating role of trust and commitment. J. Mark. Commun. 25, 89–114. doi: 10.1080/13527266.2017.1393768 CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar Wagner, D., Vollmar, G., and Wagner, H. T. (2014). The impact of information technology on knowledge creation: an affordance approach to social media. J. Enterp. Inf. Manag. 27, 31–44. doi: 10.1108/JEIM-09-2012-0063 CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar Wise, S., Paton, R. A., and Gegenhuber, T. (2012). Value co-creation through collective intelligence in the public sector. A review of US and European initiatives. Vine 42, 251–276. doi: 10.1108/03055721211227273 CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar Xu, S. X., and Zhang, X. (2009). How do social media shape the information environment in the financial market? Proceedings of International Conference of Information Systems, Phoenix. Google Scholar Yadav, A., Rajesh, K. S., Ruchi, M., and Surajit, B. (2023). Perceived challenges affecting user engagement in online community: an analysis of interrelationships and interaction. Int J. 1463–5771. doi: 10.1108/BIJ-11-2022-0710. [Epub ahead-of-print]. CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar Zarifis, A. (2019). The six relative advantages in multichannel retail for three-dimensional virtual worlds and two-dimensional websites. WebSci '19: proceedings of the 10th ACM conference on web science, 363–372. Google Scholar Zhen, L., Yan, B., Tang, J. L., Nan, Y., and Yang, A. (2023). Social network dynamics, bots, and community-based online misinformation spread: lessons from anti-refugee and COVID-19 misinformation cases. Inf. Soc. 39, 17–34. doi: 10.1080/01972243.2022.2139031 CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar