On the fraudulently awarded PhD to Evgeniya Burtseva. Issue 2: LTU case of deliberately violating all rules when awarding PhD for the doctoral thesis mostly consisting of stolen and/or plagiarized results.

Abstract: Irrefutable facts and evidence of fraudulence while awarding PhD to Evgeniya Burtseva at Luleå University of Technology (LTU) in Sweden, are presented.

Although it may be hard to believe, but what is presented here is the true case of research/academic fraudulence committed by a group of colluding accomplices.

In particular, the presented case can be characterized by the following keywords/phrases: thefts and plagiarism in Burtseva’s PhD thesis, as well as forgery committed by E.Burtseva; the lying and thieving impostor-supervisor L.Maligranda; opponent-marionette L.Skrzypczak; dummy-co-supervisors S.Ericsson and I.Söderqvist; dummy-experts-evaluators T.Tossavainen, A.Holmbom and P.Jonsén; illegitimate member of the grading committee R.Pluciennik; concealment of the PhD thesis before the defence, during the defence and even up to 3 days after its fraudulent defence; keeping secret the link to the so-called public PhD defence procedure online; chairperson of the PhD defence act and the so-called supervisor (both illegitimate) rolled into one; PhD student position as gift for voluntarily providing certain services of non-professional character to the boss; the practice of robbing true authors in order to appoint the boss as his girlfriend's principal supervisor in the articles he had nothing to do with.

All this is not a Kafkaesque or Orwellian dystopian scenario, this is the real case with evidence issued in this presentation and supported by documents.

What's hard to miss about the essence of the award of PhD under discussion, is the legitimization of not following the rules and laws, such a model of “rule of law”.

According to the rules, Opponent is the central figure in evaluation process of the thesis and candidate’s contribution to research.

The appointed as opponent L.Skrzypczak confirmed in his letters that he acted quite consciously, taking himself on the role of a guarantor of the successful implementation of the procedure full of fraud, instead of performing the functions of appointed opponent. L.Skrzypczak deliberately inverted the procedure of awarding PhD according to the rules clearly defined in the relevant regulatory documents, into a dystopian scenario where the imposed lie becomes truth.

Skrzypczak’s inherently monstrous know-how consisting of mocking the law and cancelling the rules, is not just immoral and/or maybe in a sense criminal, but it is disastrous by its consequences/influences. This contributes to the accumulation of entropy energy, the energy of decay of true academic/research values. Let me also refer to Issue 1, https://zenodo.org/records/8370541, concerning false authorship in scientific articles and violation of publishing ethics, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/374113627.