There is a newer version of the record available.

Published July 28, 2022 | Version 5
Working paper Open

Effect of the Informed Health Choices digital secondary school resources on the ability of lower secondary students in Kenya to critically appraise health claims: protocol for a process evaluation

  • 1. Tropical Institute of Community health and Development in Africa
  • 2. University of Rwanda
  • 3. Makerere University
  • 4. Norwegian Institute of Public Health
  • 5. Oslo Metropolitan University
  • 6. Norwegian University of Science and Technology

Description

Background: People frequently make decisions about what can improve their health. They do this based on large amounts of information that they get from different sources, which include claims about what harms or improves health. People therefore need skills to assess the trustworthiness of health claims. The Informed Health Choices (IHC) Key Concepts framework was used to develop the ‘Be Smart about your Health’ secondary school resources to help students in lower secondary to assess health claims about the effects of treatments. We are evaluating these resources in a cluster randomized trial in 80 lower secondary schools in Kenya. This protocol is for a process evaluation that will be conducted alongside the trial. The objective of this evaluation is to explore the extent to which the intervention was delivered as planned; understand factors that facilitated or hindered the delivery and impact of the resources; and antici-pated and unanticipated effects.


Study design: We will employ a mixed-methods design using quantitative and qualita-tive data. We will collect quantitative data from all schools (n=40) allocated to the in-tervention arm using lesson evaluation forms. Our qualitative data collection will in-clude: (a) structured classroom observations in all schools (n=40), with at least one lesson observed in each school. In a sample of eight schools, we shall observe more than one lesson. (b) We will conduct focus group discussions (with students (n=4), teachers (n=1) and parents (n=4). (c) Key informant interviews with policymakers in education (n=5), teachers (n=8), and with school principals (n=8)). We will purposively select these schools based on location (urban and rural) and ownership (private and public).


Data analysis: We will use framework analysis to analyze qualitative data and descrip-tive analysis to analyze quantitative data. We will summarize and appraise the confi-dence of the key findings from the qualitative data using a modified version of the GRADE-CERQual approach.

Files

00 Kenya Process evaluation V5.pdf

Files (3.5 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:f987f04151bae1c7171b462458ffc545
472.9 kB Preview Download
md5:3b66d7131ae1c92a9a95e366e37866cb
187.2 kB Preview Download
md5:bff8a456016ff980ffea9f93c5945f8e
402.0 kB Preview Download
md5:80a1ac40dc7131c32e9959eb245f7979
137.5 kB Preview Download
md5:9f8e52d45ebb2adf076c445490cd571b
286.4 kB Preview Download
md5:6ecc3538eb1f77ae50632cebc22dbfaf
176.2 kB Preview Download
md5:51da14785930191d2cfb89fd67d9e13a
293.9 kB Preview Download
md5:c7ef42ca469ee1a1a187f13af807f03f
111.7 kB Preview Download
md5:2d1109d115760f6160d2e96c2b89650f
234.1 kB Preview Download
md5:b6c1b7131590965391f08b68a93a5c01
292.7 kB Preview Download
md5:ac61b6e0857ee3cb8605ec14d9514a49
245.0 kB Preview Download
md5:d7980501e3c8cf3744670f8fa1b3061f
241.1 kB Preview Download
md5:7d29a37aa38bbb10f56ea29be991086c
190.7 kB Preview Download
md5:dc8255f358ec80a42ff1f72bfc02de75
110.8 kB Preview Download
md5:083cb87c7a2ee22db73fad178e2587ca
128.0 kB Preview Download