Published October 11, 2019 | Version v1
Conference paper Open

LESSON PLAY: SUPPORTING PRE-SERVICE TEACHERS TO ENVISAGE PUPILS' SENSE-MAKING IN MATHEMATICS LESSONS

  • 1. CASTeL & School of STEM Education, Innovation & Global Studies, Dublin City University
  • 2. St Joseph's Primary School, Dún Laoghaire

Description

In this paper the potential of Lesson Play in mathematics teacher education is explored. Through the process of script writing in Lesson Play, teachers imagine their own responses to classroom situations. We describe how script writing has the potential to help pre-service teachers envisage ways in which pupils make sense of mathematics, and become more aware of the teacher moves that allow pupils to articulate and modify ideas in mathematics lessons. We analyse the lesson script of one pre-service teacher with reference to Grice’s Conversational Maxims, and discuss ways in which Lesson Play can be developed to further enhance pre-service teachers’ ability to facilitate classroom discussions.

Files

Grimes_P.pdf

Files (278.7 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:57ca1a568a33020da7cce739704d6717
278.7 kB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • Bills, L. (2000). Politeness in teacher-student dialogue in mathematics: A socio-linguistic analysis. For the Learning of Mathematics, 20(2), 40-47.
  • Brodie, K. (2011). Working with learners' mathematical thinking: Towards a language of description for changing pedagogy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(1), 174-186.
  • Clerkin, A., Perkins, R. & Chubb, E. (2017). Inside the primary classroom: What happens in Fourth Class? Dublin: Educational Research Centre.
  • Crespo, S., Oslund, J. A., & Parks, A. N. (2011). Imagining mathematics teaching practice: Prospective teachers generate representations of a class discussion. ZDM, 43(1), 119-131.
  • Cobb, P., and Yackel, E. (1998). A constructivist perspective on the culture of the mathematics classroom. In F. Seeger, J. Voigt and U. Waschescio (Eds.), The culture of the mathematics classroom (pp. 158-190). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Forman, E. A., and Larreamendy-Joerns, J. (1998). Making explicit the implicit: Classroom explanations and conversational implicatures. Mind, Culture and Activity, 5(2), 105-113.
  • Gov. of Ire. (1999). Primary curriculum: Mathematics. Dublin: The Stationery Office.
  • McGlynn-Stewart, M. (2010). Listening to students, listening to myself: Addressing pre- service teachers' fears of mathematics and teaching mathematics. Studying Teacher Education, 6(2), 175-186.
  • Morgan, C., Craig, T., Schuette, M., & Wagner, D. (2014). Language and communication in mathematics education: An overview of research in the field. ZDM, 46(6), 843-853.
  • O'Connor, M. C. (2001). ''Can any fraction be turned into a decimal?'' A case study of a mathematical group discussion. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 46, 143-185.
  • Rowland, T. (2000). The pragmatics of mathematics education: Vagueness in mathematical discourse. London: Falmer Press.
  • Vanderveken, D. (1990). Meaning and Speech Acts: Principles of Language Use (Vol. 1). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Zazkis, R., Liljedahl, P., & Sinclair, N. (2009). Lesson plays: Planning teaching versus teaching planning. For the learning of mathematics, 29(1), 40-47.