mRNA "vaccine" biodistribution, persistence, and adjuvant toxicity library

Compiled by Dr. Martin Wucher, MSC Dent Sc (eq DDS), Dr. Byram Bridle, PhD, Erik Sass, et al. 

Doi: 10.5281/zenodo.14559625

Last updated December 26, 2024. Corresponding author: eriksass@gmail.com

Originally part of the outer coat of the SARS-CoV2 virus, where it functions as a “key” to “unlock” (infect) cells, spike proteins are also produced in large amounts by the mRNA “vaccines,” triggering a short-lived immune response in the form of antibodies. However, a growing body of evidence has shown that the spike protein is harmful by itself (see: “Spike protein pathogenicity research library,” https://zenodo.org/records/14559644). Furthermore, research has demonstrated that:

1)        Both the “vaccine” mRNA encoding for the spike protein antigen and the spike protein itself can penetrate distant tissues, causing systemic harms.

2)        “Vaccine” mRNA and the spike protein antigen persist in the tissues of human vaccine recipients and animal test subjects far longer than claimed by public health officials, while viral spike proteins have been shown to persist even longer.

3)        The ionizable lipid nanoparticles (LNPs) used in the experimental mRNA injections are highly inflammatory on their own, including their polyethylene glycol (PEG) component, an established cause of anaphylaxis (an extreme allergic reaction).

The following research collection presents over 100 peer-reviewed studies (n=130) documenting I) the wide distribution and II) persistence of “vaccine” mRNA and the encoded spike protein, as well as III) the potential harms of the LNP delivery system (some studies with overlapping findings appear in more than one category). Taken together with evidence of the spike protein’s pathogenicity (https://zenodo.org/records/14559644), these findings suggest that the mRNA “vaccines” can distribute harmful, long-lasting spike protein uncontrollably throughout the body, causing injuries and death by various means.

Please note that a small number of studies in section I) investigate the ability of viral spike protein resulting from infection to cross important physiological barriers on its own, while some studies in section II) demonstrate the long persistence of viral-derived spike protein in the absence of viable virus, bolstering concerns about the identical “vaccine” spike.

These compilations originated with Dr. Wucher’s and Dr. Bridle’s contributions to TOXIC SHOT: Facing the Dangers of the COVID "Vaccines." 

See also:

“SARS-CoV2 spike protein pathogenicity research collection” (n=320) https://zenodo.org/records/14559644

“SARS-CoV2 vaccine and viral variant research library” (n=63) https://zenodo.org/records/14594436

“COVID ‘vaccine’ immune imprinting library” (n=131) https://zenodo.org/records/14632346