Published March 22, 2024 | Version 2
Journal article Open

PROCare4Life lessons learned

  • 1. INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR INTEGRATED CARE, The Base B Evert van de Beekstraat 1-104 Schiphol Airport, 1118 CBL, The Netherlands
  • 2. Casa di Cura Igea, Milan, Lombardy, Italy
  • 3. Association Parkinson Madrid, Madrid, 28014, Spain
  • 4. CNS - Campus Neurológico, Torres Vedras, 2560, Portugal
  • 5. KINETIKOS, Lisbon, 1700-093, Portugal
  • 6. University of Münster, Münster, 48149, Germany
  • 7. University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, 53127, Germany
  • 8. Maastricht University, Maastricht, 6211 LK, The Netherlands
  • 9. Universidad Politécnica Madrid, Madrid, 28040, Spain

Description

PeRsOnalised Integrated CARE Solution for Elderly (PROCare4Life) was an EU-funded project that ran from January 2020 until June 2023, whose focus was to further develop and integrate previous ICT solutions developed by several previous EU-funded projects into a unique modular system able to support the autonomy and empowerment and to increase the Quality of Life (QoL) of elderly people living with Parkinson's, Alzheimer's, or similar dementia, having also tested the system for elderly people living with comorbidities. This article focuses on the methodology and results used to identify the internal lessons learned. PROCare4Life was developed using a codesign approach involving more than 2,000 participants whose input has been listened to and transformed into valuable changes of the system and also into lessons learned included in this case study report. Since the beginning of the implementation of PROCare4Life, there has been a commitment to make invisible knowledge visible through open discussion and including our lessons learned in each of our deliverables. In the last six months of implementation, qualitative research has been implemented by the PROCare4Life consortium to identify and select our most relevant challenges and recommendations for future projects and initiatives. PROCare4Life was highly impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic, and it is acknowledged in the lessons learned. However, the consortium has focused on the recommendations that could be more valuable for ordinary implementation of future projects and initiatives developing eHealth tools for elderly citizens living with conditions that might affect their cognitive or mobility capacities.

PeRsOnalised Integrated CARE Solution for Elderly (PROCare4Life) was an EU-funded project that ran from January 2020 until June 2023, aiming at improving the quality of life of older people living with Parkinson's, Alzheimer's or other dementia using ICT technologies. The term implementation refers to the process of putting a plan or idea into action. It is a complex process that involves multiple stages, including planning, execution, and evaluation. Implementation research is a growing field of health research that aims to study the factors that affect the implementation of health policies, programs, and practices. It can help identify the best strategies for introducing potential solutions into a health system or promoting their large-scale use and sustainability. i For PROCare4Life, when using the term implementation it covers all the stages, including ideation and design phases, although focusing on the pilot 3 iterative codesign and testing of the system. Using daily life devices such as smartphones and smart watches, more than 2,000 people have contributed to co-creating PROCare4Life. The three profiles focused on were older people living with Parkinson's, Alzheimer's or other dementia, their main carers and their healthcare professionals, with an ICT system providing direct communication and allowing them to share their health status. Along the journey to develop PROCare4Life, our European consortium has learned many things that we have internally investigated and reported in this article. We have identified 20 challenges and 41 recommendations. We hope that our lessons learned might be inspiring and valuable for others, particularly future projects and initiatives developing eHealth tools for elderly EU citizens living with different conditions that might affect their cognitive or mobility capabilities.

Files

openreseurope-3-18581.pdf

Files (1.0 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:465872ce88a506260600fc49144f4b76
1.0 MB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • Belmonte-Hernández A, Semerci YC, Proença JP (2022). PROCare4Life: An integrated care platform to improve the quality of life of Parkinson's and Alzheimer's patients. doi:10.1145/3529190.3534727
  • Rowe SF, Sikes S (2006). Lessons learned: taking it to the next level.
  • (2023). Lessons learned.
  • McDonald RA (2015). A Methodology for Identifying Lessons Learned—An Integration of Case Study Techniques with General Systems Paradigm and Congruence Theory.
  • Rowe SF, Sikes S (2006). Lessons learned: sharing the knowledge.
  • (null). Organization of the Americas States.
  • Maureen Dobbins RN, National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools (2017). Rapid Review Guidebook. Steps for conducting a rapid review.
  • (2021). EU-funded project success stories.
  • Karamanidou C, Scarfò L, Doubek M (2022). Lessons learned from the mypal digital health intervention: capitalizing on the patient reported outcomes (pro) paradigm towards a participatory healthcare for patients with hematological malignancies. Hemasphere. doi:10.1097/01.HS9.0000852220.94026.95
  • Raben D, Casabona J, Cosmaro L (2021). Lessons learned from the first European project on the integration of infectious diseases in testing services, data collection and country responses. BMC Infect Dis. doi:10.1186/s12879-021-06362-7
  • Paleari L, Malini V, Paoli G (2022). EU-Funded Telemedicine Projects - Assessment of, and Lessons Learned From, in the Light of the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic. Front Med (Lausanne). doi:10.3389/fmed.2022.849998
  • (2021). 14 Lessons Tech Experts Learned From Problematic Projects.
  • Ospina Y, Aprà FM, Aggeli A (2023). Lessons learnt during the workshop "Empowerment of citizens: fostering user engagement for innovative demand response for effective flexibility" [version 1; peer review: 3 approved with reservations]. Open Res Europe. doi:10.12688/openreseurope.15270.1
  • Liljas AEM, Walters K, Jovicic A (2017). Strategies to improve engagement of 'hard to reach' older people in research on health promotion: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. doi:10.1186/s12889-017-4241-8
  • Fiordelli M, Fadda M, Amati R (2021). Older adults' motivations to participate or not in epidemiological research. Qualitative inquiry on a study into dementia in Switzerland. PLoS One. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0247141
  • Lettieri E, Fumagalli LP, Radaelli G (2015). Empowering patients through eHealth: a case report of a pan-European project. BMC Health Serv Res. doi:10.1186/s12913-015-0983-0
  • (2021). See A summary of the achievements and lessons learned of the euCONSENT project and what comes next.
  • König A, Hatzakis T, Andrushevich A (2022). A reflection on participatory research methodologies in the light of the COVID-19 - lessons learnt from the European Research Project TRIPS [version 2; peer review: 2 approved]. Open Res Europe. doi:10.12688/openreseurope.14315.2
  • (2021). CAPACITY4DEV of the European Commission.
  • (2018). EU FOSSA Pilot project Lessons Learned.
  • Srivastava P, Hopwood N (2009). A Practical Iterative Framework for Qualitative Data Analysis. Int J Qual Methods. doi:10.1177/160940690900800107
  • Morgan H (2022). Conducting a Qualitative Document Analysis. Qual Rep. doi:10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5044
  • Lester JN, Cho Y, Lochmiller CR (2020). Learning to Do Qualitative Data Analysis: A Starting Point. Hum Resour Dev Rev. doi:10.1177/1534484320903890
  • George T (2023). Mixed Methods Research | Definition, Guide & Examples.
  • Ahmed M, Marín M, Bouça-Machado R (2021). Investigating Users' and Other Stakeholders' Needs in the Development of a Personalized Integrated Care Platform (PROCare4Life) for Older People with Dementia or Parkinson Disease: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study. JMIR Res Protoc. doi:10.2196/22463
  • Ahmed M, Marín M, How D (2022). End Users' and Other Stakeholders' Needs and Requirements in the Development of a Personalized Integrated Care Platform (PROCare4Life) for Older People With Dementia or Parkinson Disease: Mixed Methods Study. JMIR Form Res. doi:10.2196/39199