Sustainable soil management measures: a synthesis of stakeholder recommendations
- 1. Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Eberswalder Str. 84, 15374 Müncheberg, Germany / Institute of Physical Geography and Landscape Ecology, Leibniz University Hannover, Schneiderberg 50, 30167 Hannover, Germany
- 2. Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Eberswalder Str. 84, 15374 Müncheberg, Germany
- 3. Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Eberswalder Str. 84, 15374 Müncheberg, Germany / Landscape Architecture Department, Remote Sensing and GIS Lab, Cukurova University, 01330 Adana, Turkey
- 4. Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research (ZALF), Eberswalder Str. 84, 15374 Müncheberg, Germany / Faculty of Landscape Management and Nature Conservation, University for Sustainable Development (HNEE), Schicklerstr. 5, 16225 Eberswalde, Germany
Description
Soil degradation threatens agricultural production and soil multifunctionality. Efforts for private and public governance
are increasingly emerging to leverage sustainable soil management. They require consensus across science, policy,
and practice about what sustainable soil management entails. Such agreement does not yet exist to a sufficient extent
in agronomic terms; what is lacking is a concise list of soil management measures that enjoy broad support among
all stakeholders, and evidence on the question what hampers their implementation by farmers. We therefore screened
stakeholder documents from public governance institutions, nongovernmental organizations, the agricultural industry,
and conventional and organic farmer associations for recommendations related to agricultural soil management
in Germany. Out of 46 recommended measures in total, we compiled a shortlist of the seven most consensual ones:
(1) structural landscape elements, (2) organic fertilization, (3) diversified crop rotation, (4) permanent soil cover, (5)
conservation tillage, (6) reduced soil loads, and (7) optimized timing of wheeling. Together, these measures support
all agricultural soil functions, and address all major soil threats except soil contamination. Implementation barriers
were identified with the aid of an online survey among farmers (n = 78). Results showed that a vast majority of farmers
(> 80%) approved of all measures. Barriers were mostly considered to be economic and in some cases technological,
while missing knowledge or other factors were less relevant. Barriers were stronger for those measures that cannot be
implemented in isolation, but require a systemic diversification of the production system. This is especially the case for
measures that are simultaneously beneficial to many soil functions (measures 2, 3, and 4). Results confirm the need for
a diversification of the agricultural system in order to meet challenges of food security and climate change. The shortlist
presents the first integrative compilation of sustainable soil management measures supporting the design of effective
public or private governance.
Files
Strauß et al 2023 Sustainable soil management measures - a synthesis of stakeholder recommendations.pdf
Files
(2.4 MB)
Name | Size | Download all |
---|---|---|
md5:ce0a364cbefe72be12e4dcfadfab37c8
|
2.4 MB | Preview Download |