Other Open Access
Foster, Antoinette; Hindle, Samantha; Murphy, Katrina M.; Saderi, Daniela
The Reviewer Guide is meant for anyone who is reviewing a research manuscript. It provides a comprehensive, step-by-step framework for the reviewer to use while they are composing a review. The guide includes resources adapted from the PLOS Peer Review Center and quotes from journal editors gathered via individual conversations or a survey. It also contains a printable template that a reviewer can use while composing the review.
The Reviewer Guide is part of a toolkit developed in the context of PREreview Open Reviewers. The other two guides published in the toolkit are the Bias Reflection Guide and the Review Assessment Rubric.
Foster, A., Hindle, S., Murphy, K. M., Saderi, D. (2021). Open Reviewers Bias Reflection Guide. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5484052
Foster, A., Hindle, S., Murphy, K. M., Saderi, D. (2021). Open Reviewers Review Assessment Rubric. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5484072
Nicholson, J. M., Mordaunt, M., Lopez, P., Uppala, A., Rosati, D., Rodrigues, N.P., Grabitz, P., Rife, S.C. (2021). Scite: a smart citation index that displays the context of citations and classifies their intent using deep learning. Quantitative Science Studies. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00146
Okune, A. (2019). Self-Review of Citational Practice. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3066861
Silbiger, N.J., Stubler, A.D. (2019). Unprofessional peer reviews disproportionately harm underrepresented groups in STEM. PeerJ 7:e8247 https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.8247
|All versions||This version|
|Data volume||1.2 GB||1.2 GB|