Published April 21, 2021 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Behaviour-specific habitat selection patterns of breeding barn owls

  • 1. Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, Biophore, Lausanne, Switzerland
  • 2. Swiss Ornithological Institute, Sempach, Switzerland
  • 3. Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, Biophore, Lausanne, Switzerland, and, Instituto de Investigación e Ingeniería Ambiental, Laboratorio de Ecología de Enfermedades Transmitidas por Vectores, Universidad Nacional de San Martín, San Martín, Buenos Aires, Argentina, and, Inmunova S.A., San Martín, Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • 4. Department of Migration, Max Planck Institute of Animal Behaviour, Radolfzell, Germany, and, Department of Biology, University of Konstanz, Constance, Germany

Description

Abstract

Background
The intensification of agricultural practices over the twentieth century led to a cascade of detrimental effects on ecosystems. In Europe, agri-environment schemes (AES) have since been adopted to counter the decrease in farmland biodiversity, with the promotion of extensive habitats such as wildflower strips and extensive meadows. Despite having beneficial effects documented for multiple taxa, their profitability for top farmland predators, like raptors, is still debated. Such species with high movement capabilities have large home ranges with fluctuation in habitat use depending on specific needs.

Methods
Using GPS devices, we recorded positions for 134 barn owls (Tyto alba) breeding in Swiss farmland and distinguished three main behavioural modes with the Expectation-Maximization binary Clustering (EMbC) method: perching, hunting and commuting. We described barn owl habitat use at different levels during the breeding season by combining step and path selection functions. In particular, we examined the association between behavioural modes and habitat type, with special consideration for AES habitat structures.

Results
Despite a preference for the most common habitats at the home range level, behaviour-specific analyses revealed more specific habitat use depending on the behavioural mode. During the day, owls roosted almost exclusively in buildings, while pastures, meadows and forest edges were preferred as nocturnal perching sites. For hunting, barn owls preferentially used AES habitat structures though without neglecting more intensively exploited areas. For commuting, open habitats were preferred over wooded areas.

Conclusions
The behaviour-specific approach used here provides a comprehensive breakdown of barn owl habitat selection during the reproductive season and highlights its importance to understand complex animal habitat preferences. Our results highlight the importance of AES in restoring and maintaining functional trophic chains in farmland.

Files

Sechaud et al 2021 Move Ecol - Behaviour-specific habitat selection patterns of breeding barn owls.pdf

Additional details

Funding

The genomics of sexually antagonistic selection 31003A_173178
Swiss National Science Foundation