Published March 19, 2020 | Version v1
Dataset Open

Data from: Influences of patch-burn grazing on headwater prairie streams and subsequent recovery

  • 1. Southern Illinois University Carbondale
  • 2. University of Florida
  • 3. Kansas State University
  • 4. Clemson University
  • 5. Miami University

Description

1. Patch-burn grazing (PBG) can promote terrestrial heterogeneity and biodiversity, but can temporarily increase stream nutrients, ecosystem metabolism, and alter macroinvertebrate assemblages. The impacts of grazing on stream channel morphology and post-PBG recovery patterns are unclear. 2. We assessed the influence of grazing in PBG managed grassland streams in Missouri, USA, and subsequent recovery when grazing ceased for two years. We hypothesized that grazing would degrade water quality, stream biotic integrity, and channel morphology, but that riparian fencing would mitigate these effects. We predicted that biological and chemical variables in unfenced streams would return to pre-PBG levels within two years after grazing ceased, but channel morphology would not. 3. Six small headwater streams (two in ungrazed control watersheds, two in PBG watersheds with 10 m fenced riparian zones, and two in unfenced PBG) were sampled over seven years; 2 years before PBG, 3 years during PBG, and 2 years post-PBG. We sampled macroinvertebrates and water chemistry monthly when water was present and surveyed channel morphology at least once each study period. 4. During grazing, unfenced watersheds showed the greatest changes in channel width, depth, and area. During the post-PBG period, one of the two unfenced watersheds showed partial recovery of channel morphology. Although grazing increased concentrations of nutrients and chlorophyll a, concentrations returned to pre-PBG conditions after grazing ended, indicating recovery. Very fine organic sediments increased in the unfenced watersheds compared to the control during grazing but recovered afterwards. Contributions of Chironomidae to total invertebrate abundance increased in the unfenced watersheds during grazing, and then decreased during the post-PBG period. 5. Riparian fencing mostly mitigated effects of grazing on the streams. Unfenced streams were resilient to effects of grazing in a PBG managed grassland, with most metrics recovering within two years after grazing ceased, except for channel morphology. 6. Synthesis and applications: Grazing in a PBG managed grassland coupled with riparian fencing could be an effective conservation tool in prairies, with relatively modest influences on stream water quality and biotic integrity. Persistent changes in stream geomorphology and effects of longer periods of grazing deserve further research.

Notes

Gray boxes in the Osage Geomorphology Data.xlsx file are cross-sections that were lost for reasons explained in the manuscript.

Funding provided by: Missouri Department of Conservation*
Crossref Funder Registry ID:
Award Number:

Funding provided by: Southern Illinois University Carbondale*
Crossref Funder Registry ID:
Award Number:

Funding provided by: Kansas State University
Crossref Funder Registry ID: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100007829
Award Number:

Files

Files (352.3 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:4fe2da5daed88686b65ec0da0af1fb1d
164.1 kB Download
md5:04a3ad7fd110fbb9d98320a4cf47ef15
15.4 kB Download
md5:4b218892b138e496aae47b9e30665aad
55.0 kB Download
md5:6f180d9028a908d8a9cbfb9cbac43f43
76.3 kB Download
md5:23821f38713c9d39d5bda99505e46ab5
41.5 kB Download

Additional details

Related works