Published January 23, 2020 | Version v1
Taxonomic treatment Open

Phtisica marina Slabber 1769

  • 1. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Biológicas (Zoologia), Museu Nacional / Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 20940 - 040, Brazil. Museu Nacional, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Laboratório de Carcinologia, RJ, 20940 - 040, Brazil.

Description

Phtisica marina Slabber, 1769

Figs 3–5

Phtisica marina Slabber, 1769: 79, figs 1–3; type locality: Zeeland.

Proto elongatus Dana, 1853: 810, pl. 54, fig. 1.

Phtisica verae Quitete, 1979: 6–7; figs 1, 2.

Phtisica marina – Sars 1895: 646–648, figs 233. — McCain 1968: 91, figs 46–47 (see extensive synonymy). — Krapp-Schickel 1993: 806, figs 549–550. — Conradi et al. 1997: 98–110. — Serejo 1998 a: 381. — Wakabara & Serejo 1998: 582. — Winfield et al. 2006: 102. — LeCroy et al. 2009: 965. — Lacerda & Masunari 2011: 372, figs 3c; 10. — Martin et al. 2013: 1703. — Mauro & Serejo 2015: 124 (key).

Proto ventricosa — Oliveira 1940: 140.

Phtisica verae — Wakabara & Serejo 1998: 582. — Lacerda & Massunari 2011: 366.

Diagnosis

Body smooth, head about same as long as pereonite 2 length. Antenna 1 variable in length, from 0.5 times body length to equal. Pereonites 2–4 with pairs of gills, first pair smaller. Pereopods 3–4 propodus with 4–5 robust setae. Morphotype I gnathopod 2 merus and carpus not expanded, palm slightly membranous, lobes absent; pereopod 3 dactylus with single setae row. Morphotype II gnathopod 2 merus and carpus slightly expanded, propodus with 3–4 membranous lobes. Male abdomen with pair of 2-articulate appendages and one pair of pyriform appendages.

Material examined

BRAZIL – Rio de Janeiro • 1 ♂ (used for description of morphotype II); Angra dos Reis; 24 m; 12.2 mm; CDZRJ 1014 • 1 ♂ (used for description of morphotype I); Campos Basin; 22º19′27.06″S, 40º37′25.12″W, 75m; 11.7mm; MNRJ29413 • 15 ♂♂; Campos Basin; 22º19′27.06″ S, 40º37′25.12″W; 75 m; MNRJ 23483 • 18 ♂♂, 8 ♀♀; Campos Basin; 23º36′14.903″S, 41º21′29.953″W; 99 m; MNRJ 23488 • 5 ♂♂, 7 ♀♀; Campos Basin; 22º12′33.09″ S, 40º13′24.96″W; 30 m; MNRJ 23485. – São Paulo • 1 ♀ (P. verae allotype); Ubatuba, Enseada do Flamengo; 20 m; 9.8 mm; CDZRJ 1012 – Santa Catarina • 1 ♂, 1 ♀; Ilha do Arvoredo; 3 m; MNRJ 19421

Redescription

HEAD. Labrum outer and inner lobes well demarcated, inner lobe rounded and solid, with row of minute setae. Maxilla 1 outer lobe with five setae and two minute, robust setae; palp 2-articulate with three distal-lateral setae and row of six apical setae. Maxilla 2 external lobe with six apical setae; inner lobe with five apical setae. Left mandible incisor 5-toothed, lacinia mobilis 5-toothed and two accessory plates, row of 12 lateral setae, palp 3-articulate, first article with two distal setae, setal formula of last article 1–2–1–1; right mandible with incisor 5-toothed, lacinia mobilis 5-toothed with two accessory plates. Maxilliped inner plate with one subdistal robust seta and two robust setae on center-distal portion, outer lobe longer than inner lobe, with row of five lateral setae, palp article two enlarged with row of about 14 setae, article 3 with distal crown of setae.

THORAX. Gnathopod 1, ischium subquadrate, merus with lateral and ventral setae, carpus about two times as long as merus, propodus upper border rectilinear, ventral border with acute projection enclosing four robust proximal setae, palm with line of robust setae, dactylus smooth. Male morphotype I: gnathopod 2 merus about as long as carpus, propodus with small proximal indent with two robust setae, palm armed with scarce, small setae, slightly membranous, lobes absent. Pereopod 3, propodus not recurved at center, with 4–5 robust setae. Pereopod 4 propodus subequal in shape to pereopod 3, with 4–5 setae. Male morphotype II: gnathopod 2 merus two times as long as carpus, propodus ‘bulked’; proximal indent with three robust setae; palm with 3–4 large visible membranous lobes, dactylus smooth and strongly recurved. Pereopod 3 propodus slightly recurved at center (Fig. 4) with 4–5 robust setae in two rows, occasionally with single, robust seta located at center. Pereopod 4 propodus less strong than pereopod three with 4–5 setae. Pereopods 5–7 missing in examined adults.

ABDOMEN. Proximal part slightly projected with one pair of 1–articulate pyriform appendages, two pairs of 2–articulate appendages and one pair of lobes. Abdomen tip smooth.

FEMALE. 9.8 mm. Body smooth. Gill plates present on pereonites 2–4. Oostegites reaching end of pereopods 3–4 basis. Gnathopod 1 merus and carpus slightly setose, propodus ventral-lateral margin with fringe of slender setae. Proximal projection with two robust and one slender seta, propodus palm with row of small robust setae and small projections, dactylus serrate. Gnathopod 2 carpus minute, much smaller than merus, propodus nearly elliptical, more than two times as long as wide, with acute ventral projection and three robust setae, palm of gnathopod two membranous lobes absent, dactylus smooth. Pereopod 3 propodus with three robust setae at center, row of minute distal setae, sometimes not visible. Pereopod 4 similar to 3. Pereopods 5–7 not present in any of adult individuals examined.

Distribution (Figs 6–7)

Type locality: North Atlantic, Zeeland (Krapp-Schickel 1993). Atlantic Ocean: Norway, Canary Islands, Azores, West Africa, South Africa (McCain 1968). Gulf of Mexico (Winfield et al. 2006, LeCroy et al. 2009); Florida, West Coast to Panama, Caribbean Sea, Cuba (Ortíz & Lalana 2010, Martin et al. 2013), Venezuela (Díaz et al. 2005), Colombia (McCain 1968), Southern Iberian Peninsula (Conradi et al. 1997); North Africa (McCain 1968). Brazil: Bahia – Abrolhos Bank (Young & Serejo 2005); Rio de Janeiro – Angra dos Reis (Quitete 1979 as P verae), Arraial do Cabo (Serejo 1998), Campos Basin (Mauro & Serejo, 2015, present study); São Paulo – Enseada do Flamengo, Ubatuba (Quitete 1979 as P.verae); Santa Catarina – Ilha do Arvoredo (present study), Barra do Sul, Florianópolis (Lacerda & Masunari 2011). Mediterranean Sea: France, Monaco, Sardinia, Italy (Thyrrhenian Sea), Sicily, Malta, Italy-Ionian Sea, Yugoslavia, Israel (Krapp-Schickel 1993). Depth range: 3 to 1470 m (see Winfield et al. 2006 for slope records).

Ecological notes

Phtisica marina has been collected in plankton and benthos samples (McCain 1968) on soft bottom (Winfield et al. 2006), but all material herein examined is from benthos samples. Phtisica marina is associated with a diverse type of substrates, e.g., sponge Dysidea (Wakabara & Serejo 1998), algae Amphiroa beauvoissi (Lacerda & Masunari 2011), Posidonia (with hydroids and Bryozoa), Aterias (Asteroidea) (Krapp-Schickel 1993).

Notes

Published as part of Mauro, Fábio da Motta, Nascimento, Priscila Soares do & Serejo, Cristiana Silveira, 2020, New discoveries for the subfamily Phtisicinae Vassilenko, 1968 (Crustacea: Senticaudata) from the Brazilian coast, pp. 1-17 in European Journal of Taxonomy 597 on pages 7-8, DOI: 10.5852/ejt.2019.597, http://zenodo.org/record/3659632

Files

Files (7.4 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:3393248cc97d681d8b5fb02d54427a26
7.4 kB Download

System files (51.4 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:4c56fa74079fbdd792d78b0058448669
51.4 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

Biodiversity

Collection code
CDZRJ , MNRJ
Family
Phtisicidae
Genus
Phtisica
Kingdom
Animalia
Material sample ID
CDZRJ 1012 , CDZRJ 1014 , MNRJ 19421 , MNRJ 23483 , MNRJ 23485 , MNRJ 23488 , MNRJ29413
Order
Amphipoda
Phylum
Arthropoda
Scientific name authorship
Slabber
Species
marina
Taxon rank
species
Type status
allotype
Taxonomic concept label
Phtisica marina Slabber, 1769 sec. Mauro, Nascimento & Serejo, 2020

References

  • Slabber M. 1769. Natuurkundige Verlustigingen, behelzende microscopise waarneemingen van in-en Uitlandse Water-en Land-Dieren. J. Bosch, Haarlem, Nederland.
  • Dana J. D. 1853. Crustacea. Part II. In: United States Exploring Expedition During the Years 1838, 1839, 1840, 1841, 1842 Under the Command of Charles Wilkes. Vol. 14: 691 - 1618. Available from https: // biodiversitylibrary. org / page / 40412911 [accessed 17 Dec. 2019]. C. Sherman, Philadelphia.
  • Quitete J. M. P. A. 1979. Phtisica verae, nova especie de Caprellidae (Crustacea: Amphipoda) da costa brasileira. Avulso do Departamento de Zoologia, Instituto de Biologia, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro 32: 10 - 42.
  • Sars G. O. 1895. Amphipoda. In: An Account of the Crustacea of Norway With Short Descriptions and Figures of All the Species. Vol. 1. Mallingske Bogtrykkeri, Christiania and Copenhagen.
  • McCain J. C. 1968. The Caprellidae (Crustacea: Amphipoda) of the Western North Atlantic. Bulletin of the United States National Museum 278: 1 - 147. https: // doi. org / 10.5962 / bhl. part. 8960
  • Krapp-Schickel G. 1993. Suborder Caprellidea. In: Ruffo S. (ed.) Amphipoda of the Mediterranean. Part 3. Vol. 19: 577 - 809. Memoires de l'lnstitut oceanographique, Monaco.
  • Conradi M., Lopez-Gonzalez P. J. & Garcia-Gomez C. 1997. The amphipod community as a bioindicator in Algeciras Bay (Southern Iberian Peninsula) based on a spatio-temporal distribution. Marine Ecology 18 (2): 97 - 111. https: // doi. org / 10.1111 / j. 1439 - 0485.1997. tb 00430. x
  • Serejo C. S. 1998. Gammaridean and caprellidean fauna (Crustacea) associated with the sponge Dysidea fragilis Johnston at Arraial do Cabo, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Bulletin of Marine Science 63 (2): 363 - 385.
  • Winfield I., Escobar-Briones E. & Morrone J. J. 2006. Updated checklist and identification of areas of endemism of benthic amphipods (Caprellidea and Gammaridea) from offshore habitats in the SW Gulf of Mexico. Scientia Marina 70 (1): 99 - 108. https: // doi. org / 10.3989 / scimar. 2006.70 n 199
  • LeCroy S. E., Gasca R., Winfield I., Ortiz M. & Escobar-Briones E. 2009. Amphipoda (Crustacea) of the Gulf of Mexico. In: Felder D. L. & Camp D. K. (ed.) Gulf of Mexico-Origins, Waters, and Biota. Biodiversity: 941 - 972. Texas A & M University Press, College Station, Texas.
  • Lacerda M. B. & Masunari S. 2011. Chave de identificacao para caprelideos (Crustacea, Amphipoda) ocorrentes no litoral dos Estados do Parana e de Santa Catarina. Biota Neotropica 11 (3): 1 - 12. https: // doi. org / 10.1590 / S 1676 - 06032011000300030
  • Martin A., Diaz Y., Miloslavich P., Escobar-Briones E., Guerra-Garcia J. M., Ortiz M. & Klein E. 2013. Regional diversity of Amphipoda in the Caribbean Sea. Revista de Biologia Tropical 61 (4): 1681 - 1720. http: // www. ncbi. nlm. nih. gov / pubmed / 24432528
  • Mauro F. M. & Serejo C. S. 2015. The Family Caprellidae (Amphipoda: Caprelloidea: Caprellidae) from Campus basin, Southwestern Atlantic with a key of species occurring in Brazil. Zootaxa 4006 (1): 103 - 127. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 4006.1.5
  • Oliveira L. P. H. 1940. Contribuicao ao conhecimento dos Crustaceos do Rio de Janeiro. Catalogo dos Crustaceos da Baia de Guanabara. Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 35 (1): 137 - 151.
  • Ortiz M. & Lalana R. 2010. Distribucion de los anfipodos (Crustacea, Malacostraca, Peracarida) de los subordenes Gammaridea, Caprellidea e Hyperiidea, presentes en el archipielago cubano. Revista de Investigaciones Marinas 31: 75 - 90.
  • Diaz Y. J., Guerra-Garcia J. M. & Martin A. 2005. The Caprellidea (Crustacea: Amphipoda) from Venezuela. Organisms Diversity & Evolution 5: 249 - 251. https: // doi. org / 10.1016 / j. ode. 2004.11.010
  • Young P. S. & Serejo C. S. 2005. Crustacea of the Abrolhos Region, Brazil. In: Dutra G. F., Allen G. R., Werner T., McKenna S. A. (ed.) A Rapid Marine Biodiversity Assessment of the Abrolhos Bank 39: 91 - 95. Bahia, Brazil. RAP Bulletin of Biological Assessment, Conservation International.