Info: Zenodo’s user support line is staffed on regular business days between Dec 23 and Jan 5. Response times may be slightly longer than normal.

Published May 29, 2018 | Version v1
Journal article Open

The GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) framework for health system and public health decisions

  • 1. Norwegian Institute of Public Health, PO Box 4404, Nydalen, N-0403, Oslo, Norway
  • 2. Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
  • 3. Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
  • 4. Evidence-Based Health Care Program, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
  • 5. Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, CIBERESP-IIB Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain

Description

Objective: To describe a framework for people making and using evidence-informed health system and public health recommendations and decisions.

Background: We developed the GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) framework for health system and public health decisions as part of the DECIDE project, in which we simultaneously developed frameworks for these and other types of healthcare decisions, including clinical recommendations, coverage decisions and decisions about diagnostic tests.

Developing the framework: Building on GRADE EtD tables, we used an iterative approach, including brainstorming, consultation of the literature and with stakeholders, and an international survey of policy-makers. We applied the framework to diverse examples, conducted workshops and user testing with health system and public health guideline developers and policy-makers, and observed and tested its use in real-life guideline panels.

Findings: All the GRADE EtD frameworks share the same basic structure, including sections for formulating the question, making an assessment and drawing conclusions. Criteria listed in the assessment section of the health system and public health framework cover the important factors for making these types of decisions; in addition to the effects and economic impact of an option, the priority of the problem, the impact of the option on equity, and its acceptability and feasibility are important considerations that can inform both whether and how to implement an option. Because health system and public health interventions are often complex, detailed implementation considerations should be made when making a decision. The certainty of the evidence is often low or very low, but decision-makers must still act. Monitoring and evaluation are therefore often important considerations for these types of decisions.

We illustrate the different components of the EtD framework for health system and public health decisions by presenting their application in a framework adapted from a real-life guideline.

Discussion: This framework provides a structured and transparent approach to support policy-making informed by the best available research evidence, while making the basis for decisions accessible to those whom they will affect. The health system and public health EtD framework can also be used to facilitate dissemination of recommendations and enable decision-makers to adopt, and adapt, recommendations or decisions.

Files

12961_2018_Article_320.pdf

Files (1.2 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:6c6539a7c27cf1e3a8ba659ddb78adb7
33.0 kB Download
md5:9ba5ecc4671d31db4c07aa2c9b26f000
340.1 kB Download
md5:72c9e4255f547d827050ea893843bc12
30.7 kB Download
md5:76a63279cd45ec0222930c478adecfcb
817.0 kB Preview Download
md5:9189c9c8fbe3e4fd77cb1b8900fdedfb
26.2 kB Download

Additional details

Funding

DECIDE – Developing and Evaluating Communication strategies to support Informed Decisions and practice based on Evidence. 258583
European Commission