Manuscripts submitted to Cell Reviews are checked by the editorial team for compliance with the journal ethical and quality standard as well as fitting with the journal aims and scope before a first editorial decision regarding its acceptance for peer-review. If accepted for peer-review, the manuscripts are evaluated by the journal advisors and external experts for scientific, technical and ethical aspects. The propositions for scientific and editorial improvement are suggested to the authors as well as an invitation to re-submit an improved version of the manuscript. The revised manuscripts compliant with the journal quality are published on Rviews Press website and indexed on all necessary platforms of indexing and abstacting. PDF versions are also preserved on several platforms including zenodo or Lockess. Authors are invited to follow the guidelines for article types and instructions published on Cell Reviews website.

Cell Reviews as well as all journals of Rviews Press encourage constructive contribution of the editorial advisors and reviewers who are generally from divers boards (institutional researchers, independent scientists, early carrer scientists as well as retired enthusistic scientists). All those endorsing the manuscript are adequately and responsibly recognized by including their names and roles in the published manuscript. Rviews Press promotes editorial advisory and reviewer roles by maintaining a registry in collaboration with ORCID to award those roles independently of authorship. need promotion as well as providing them with the possibility