Ethical Principles and Publication Policy
 

INTERNATIONAL DORLION JOURNAL OF ACADEMIC SOCIAL RESEARCH (DASAD) stipulates that certain ethical rules must be taken into account in the creation and publication of a scientific work, for which the author, reader, researcher, journal editors, referees and publishers are responsible. These rules are as follows:

Authors:

1. Submissions must be original and scientific.

2. The manuscripts submitted should be of a quality that will contribute to academic fields, the responsibility in this regard belongs to the author.

3. Authors should be very careful in this regard as the submitted manuscripts will be subjected to plagiarism scanning by the journal.

4. The submitted manuscript should not have been published anywhere before and should not have been submitted to another journal at the same time.

5. Persons who have no academic contribution to the study should not be listed as additional authors.

6. References and bibliographies of the articles should be complete.

7. Authors should take into account the YÖK Scientific Research and Publication Ethics Directive.

referees

1. Reviewers should observe the principle of confidentiality before and after the review and evaluation process.

2. Referees should evaluate impartially and critically.

3. Reviewers should only consider the academic accuracy of the manuscript and not whether the idea presented in the manuscript is appropriate for them.

4. Reviewers should have no conflict of interest with the research, the authors and/or the funders of the research.

5. Referees should avoid insulting, denigrating, targeting and accusatory statements while preparing their reports, and should use objective and measured statements based only on the text.

6. Referees should use clear statements in their evaluation reports and express positive or negative results with their reasons.

7. If the referees have a negative opinion about the manuscript or make corrections to the manuscript, they must provide "alternative suggestions".

8. Reviewers must evaluate the manuscripts within the time allotted to them, otherwise they must notify the journal within a reasonable period of time that they will not be able to evaluate the manuscript.

9. In the event that one of the referees gives a positive evaluation and the other a negative evaluation, the decision belongs to the editor.

Editors

1. Editors have full responsibility and authority to accept or reject an article.

2. Editors should not have any conflict of interest with accepted or rejected manuscripts.

3. It is the responsibility of the editors to keep the names of reviewers and authors mutually confidential.

4. It is the editor's responsibility to check the manuscripts submitted for publication for plagiarism.

5. It is the duty of the editors to complete the preliminary review, refereeing, editing and publication processes of the manuscripts submitted to the journal in a timely and healthy manner.

6. Editors should prioritize academic concerns and criteria when accepting articles to the journal.https://dorlionjournal.com/index.php/pub/ethicalprinciples