Biodiversity Literature Repository

Submit to community
Liberated Data
Published April 3, 2015 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Cicadas impact bird communication in a noisy tropical rainforest

Creators

  • 1. Department of Biology, University of Hawaii at Hilo, 200 W. Kawili St. Hilo, HI 96720
  • 2. Department of Biology, University of Washington, 24 Kincaid Hall, Seattle WA 98105
  • 3. Union de Ornitologos, Apdo 182–4200, Naranjo de Alajuela, Costa Rica

Description

Hart, Patrick J., Hall, Robert, Ray, William, Beck, Angela, Zook, James (2015): Cicadas impact bird communication in a noisy tropical rainforest. Behavioral Ecology 26 (3): 839-842, DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arv018, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arv018

Files

source.pdf

Files (2.8 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:c87673c08a3997f6d7ba131ffd760b22
2.8 MB Preview Download

Linked records

Additional details

Identifiers

LSID
urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:C876FFC08A39FFF6FFBA131FFD760B22

Related works

Has part
Dataset: http://table.plazi.org/id/E89966268A38FFF7FC9016EBF8390D76 (URL)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.8414363 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.8414367 (DOI)

References

  • Brumm H. 2006. Signalling through acoustic windows: nightingales avoid interspecific competition by short-term adjustment of song timing. J Comp Physiol A. 192(12):1279-1285.
  • Brumm H, Slabbekoorn H. 2005. Acoustic communication in noise. Adv Study Beh. 35:151-209.
  • Brumm H, Voss K, Kollmer I, Todt D.2004.Acoustic communication in noise:regulation of call characteristics in a New World monkey. J Exp Biol. 207:443-448.
  • Charif RA, Waack AM, Strickman LM. 2010. Raven Pro User's Manual. Ithaca (New York): Cornell Lab of Ornithology.
  • Cody ML, Brown JH. 1969. Song asynchrony in neighbouring bird species. Nature. 222:778-780.
  • Dooling RJ. 1982. Auditory perception in birds. In: Kroodsma DE, Miller EH, editors. Acoustic communication in birds. New York: Academic Press. Vol. 1. p. 95-130.
  • Ellinger N, Hodl W. 2003. Habitat acoustics of a Neotropical lowland rainforest. Bioacoustics. 13(3):297-321.
  • Ficken RW, Ficken MS, Hailman JP. 1974. Temporal pattern shifts to avoid acoustic interference in singing birds. Science. 183:762-763.
  • Gerhardt HC, Huber F. 2002. Acoustic communication in insects and anurans: common problems and diverse solutions. Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press.
  • Harris JBC, Reid L. 2007. Bird Songs of Las Cruces, Costa Rica. Audio CD.
  • Henwood K, Fabrick A. 1979. A quantitative analysis of the dawn chorus: temporal selection for community optimization. The American Naturalist. 114(2):260-274.
  • Kirschel AN, Blumstein DT, Cohen RE, Buermann W, Smith TB, Slabbekoorn H. 2009. Birdsong tuned to the environment: green hylia song varies with elevation, tree cover, and noise. Behav Ecol. 20(5):1089-1095.
  • Klump G. 1996. Bird communication in the noisy world. In: Kroodsma DE, Miller EH, editors. Ecology and evolution of acoustic communication in birds. Ithaca (NY): Cornell University Press. p. 321-338.
  • Lengagne T, Jouventin P, Aubin T. 1999. Finding one's mate in a king penguin colony: efficiency of acoustic communication. Behaviour. 136(7):833-846.
  • Lombard E. 1911. Le signe de l'elevation de la voix. Ann Maladies Oreille, Larynx, Nez, Pharynx. 37(101-119): 25.
  • Luther D. 2009. The influence of the acoustic community on songs of birds in a neotropical rain forest. Behav Ecol. 20(4):864-871.
  • Morton ES. 1975. Ecological sources of selection on avian sounds. Am Nat. 109(965):17-34.
  • Narins P, Feng AS, Lin W, Schnitzler HU, Denzinger A, Suthers RA, Xu C. 2004. Old World frog and bird vocalizations contain prominent ultrasonic harmonics. J Acoust Soc Am. 115:910-913.
  • Nelson DA, Marler P. 1990. The perception of birdsong and the ecological concept of signal space. In: Stebbins WC, Berkley MA, editors. Comparative Perception, Volume II: Complex Signals. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
  • Oberweger K, Goller F. 2001. The metabolic cost of birdsong production. J Exp Biol. 204:3379-3388.
  • Patricelli GL, Blickley JL. 2006. Avian communication in urban noise: causes and consequences of vocal adjustment. Auk. 123(3):639-649.
  • Planque R, Slabbekoorn H. 2008. Spectral overlap in songs and temporal avoidance in a Peruvian bird assemblage. Ethology. 114(3):262- 271.
  • Prestwich K. 1994. The energetics of acoustic signaling in anurans and insects. Am Zool. 34(6):625-643.
  • Rogers LJ, Kaplan GT. 2000. Songs, roars, and rituals: Communication in birds, mammals, and other animals. USA: Harvard University Press.
  • Sanborn AF, Phillips PK. 1995. Scaling of sound pressure level and body size in cicadas (Homoptera: Cicadidae; Tibicinidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am. 88(4):479-484.
  • Slabbekoorn H, Peet M. 2003. Ecology: Birds sing at a higher pitch in urban noise. Nature. 424(6946):267.
  • Sueur J. 2002. Cicada acoustic communication: potential sound partitioning in a multispecies community from Mexico (Hemiptera: Cicadomorpha: Cicadidae). Biological Journal of the Linnean Society. 75(3):379-394.