A study of the reading habits of the 21st century learners
Creators
- 1. St. Dominic College of Asia
Description
Today, reading is no longer confined to printed materials since most 21st century learners prefer digital resources rather than the original printed resources. The researchers sought to uncover the reading habits of contemporary learners and share inputs based on the results of the study. The results of the study revealed that 21st century learners prefer digital reading material over printed reading material. This was due to the abundance of online resources available in the internet, which most of the 21st century learners prefer to read through digital formats. This indicates the transition to digital reading is based on the data gathered by the researchers. Findings also showed that 21st century learners read from online platforms like social media, text messages and websites on a daily basis. Readers tend to choose activities that they perceive at a lower cost. Respondents chose digital reading formats that are more convenient at a lower cost value on complex learning and retention of the information. Future efforts could focus on developing a reading module that will cater according to 21st century learners’ reading habits. Future studies are also encouraged to make a wider scope of study.
Files
EDUC2022-05_AGRAVIADOR.pdf
Files
(403.2 kB)
Name | Size | Download all |
---|---|---|
md5:a01b38a62e56f759b7cd8cb1d26db607
|
403.2 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
References
- Ackerman, R., & Goldsmith, M. (2011). Metacognitive regulation of text learning: On screen versus on paper. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 17(1), 18-32. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022086
- Aharony, N., & Bar-Ilan, J. (2018). Students' academic reading preferences: An exploratory study. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 50(1), 3-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000616656044
- Akarsu, O., & Darıyemez, T. (2014). The reading habits of university students studying English language and literature in the digital age. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 10(2), 85-99. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/104807
- Awoyemi, O. O., & Yusuf, A. R. (2016). Reading habits of users as determinants of the utilisation of library information resources of two public libraries in South-West, Nigeria. Library Philosophy and Practice, 1475. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4174&context=libphilprac
- Aydin, G., & Ayranci, B. B. (2018). Reading preferences of middle school students. World Journal of Education, 8(2), 127-139. https://doi.org/10.5430/wje.v8n2p127
- Barnes, S. S. (2019, September 23). If we don't give students the freedom to choose what they read, they may choose not to read at all. Ed Post. https://www.edpost.com/stories/if-we-dont-give-students-the-freedom-to-choose-what-they-read-they-may-choose-not-to-read-at-all
- Barshay, J. (2019, August 12). Evidence increases for reading on paper instead of screens. The Hechinger Report. https://hechingerreport.org/evidence-increases-for-reading-on-paper-instead-of-screens/
- Batur, Z., Gülveren, H., & Bek, H. (2010). A study about preservice teachers reading habits: Sampling of Usak Education Faculty. Uşak Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 3(1), 32-49.
- Blanchard, J., & Moore, T. (2010). The digital world of young children: Impact on emergent literacy [White paper]. Pearson Foundation. https://apo.org.au/sites/default/files/resource-files/2010-02/apo-nid20839.pdf
- Bloomfield, J., & Fisher, M. J. (2019). Quantitative research design. Journal of the Australasian Rehabilitation Nurses Association, 22(2), 27-30. https://search.informit.org/doi/abs/10.3316/INFORMIT.738299924514584
- Bodomo, A. B. (2010). Computer-mediated communication for linguistics and literacy: Technology and natural language education. IGI Global. https://www.igi-global.com/gateway/book/187
- Brown, S. (2016). Young learners' transactions with interactive digital texts using e-readers. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 30(1), 42-56. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2015.1105887
- Can, R., Türkyilmaz, M., & Karadeniz, A. (2010). Ergenlik dönemi öğrencilerinin okuma alişkanliklari. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 11(3), 1-21. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/1492902
- Digital Textbook Collaborative. (2012, February 1). Digital textbook playbook [PowerPoint slides]. Federal Communications Commission. https://transition.fcc.gov/files/Digital_Textbook_Playbook.pdf
- Davidovitch, N., Yavich, R., & Druckman, E. (2016). Don't throw out paper and pens yet: On the reading habits of students. Journal of International Education Research (JIER), 12(4), 129-144. https://doi.org/10.19030/jier.v12i4.9799
- Delgadova, E. (2015). Reading literacy as one of the most significant academic competencies for the university students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 178, 48-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.03.145
- DiFino, S. M. (2017, August 2). Reading's role in academic success. Brooks Rehabilitation. https://brooksrehab.org/blog/reading-s-role-in-academic-success/
- Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 109-132. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153
- Erasmus+ Programme of the European Union. (2016). Handbook for reluctant, struggling and poor readers. Education and Teacher Training Agency. http://handbook4rspreaders.org/files/flipbook-handbook-final/EN/files/basic-html/page1.html
- Foasberg, N. M. (2014). Student reading practices in print and electronic media. College & Research Libraries, 75(5), 705-723. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.75.5.705
- Gardner, B. (2012). Habit as automaticity, not frequency. European Health Psychologist, 14(2), 32-36. https://www.ehps.net/ehp/index.php/contents/article/view/ehp.v14.i2.p32/1012
- Gezgin, D. M., Gurbuz, F., & Barburoglu, Y. (2021). Undistracted reading, not more or less: The relationship between high school students' risk of smartphone addiction and their reading habits. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 28, 1095-1111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-021-09570-x
- Goldenberg, C. (2020). Reading wars, reading science, and English learners. Reading Research Quarterly, 55, S131-S144. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.340
- Hayes, A. (2019). Simple random sampling: 6 basic steps with examples. Investopedia. https://www.investopedia.com/terms/s/simple-random-sample.asp
- International Reading Association, Canadian Children's Book Centre, and National Council of Teachers of English. (2014). Leisure reading [Position statement]. https://www.literacyworldwide.org/docs/default-source/where-we-stand/leisure-reading-position-statement.pdf
- Issa, A. O., Amusan, B. B., Adeniran, C. O., & Bolarinwa, L. (2014). Perception of university undergraduate students on the effects of exposure to ICT on their reading habits: The Kwara State experience. International Journal of Digital Library Services, 4(3), 20-36. http://www.ijodls.in/uploads/3/6/0/3/3603729/3434.pdf
- Kahraman, E. (2017, August 29). How technology is changing our reading habits. Daily Sabah. https://www.dailysabah.com/feature/2017/08/29/how-technology-is-changing-our-reading-habits
- Lee, C. (2019, April 2). How to motivate originality with student book choice. Turnitin. https://www.turnitin.com/blog/how-to-motivate-originality-with-student-book-choice
- Mercado, J., Urrutia, J. D., Bautista, L. A., Borigas, J. M. E., & Elgaran, D. A. (2015). Reading attitudes of the students of Polytechnic University of the Philippines: A principal component factor analysis. European Academic Research, 3(3), 3167-3187. https://euacademic.org/UploadArticle/1731.pdf
- Mitchell, D. (2016). A conceptual study on effective independent reading practices to foster an enjoyment of reading (Master's thesis, Rowan University). https://rdw.rowan.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3499&context=etd
- Mizrachi, D., Salaz, A. M., Kurbanoglu, S., Boustany, J., & ARFIS Research Group. (2018). Academic reading format preferences and behaviors among university students worldwide: A comparative survey analysis. PloS One, 13(5), e0197444. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197444
- National Book Development Board. (2017). 2017 NBDB readership survey. https://books.gov.ph/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/2017-Readership-Survey-Publication.pdf
- Newton, E. (2019, February 25). "New literacies" — can we agree on the basics? News Co/Lab. https://newscollab.org/2019/02/25/new-literacies-can-we-agree-on-the-basics/
- Nilsen, P., Roback, K., Broström, A., & Ellström, P. E. (2012). Creatures of habit: accounting for the role of habit in implementation research on clinical behaviour change. Implementation Science, 7, 53. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-7-53
- O'Malley, S. (2017, August 15). 'There's no easy answer.' Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/digital-learning/article/2017/08/16/which-better-reading-print-or-screen
- Oschatz, K. (2015). Epistemological beliefs and motivation. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (2nd ed., pp. 887-893). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.26093-5
- Owusu-Acheaw, M., & Larson, A. G. (2014). Reading habits among students and its effect on academic performance: A study of students of Koforidua Polytechnic. Library Philosophy and Practice, 1130. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2908&context=libphilprac;Reading
- Oza, H. (2017, March 28). The importance of mobile applications in daily life. Hyperlink InfoSystem. https://www.hyperlinkinfosystem.com/blog/the-importance-of-mobile-applications-in-everyday-life
- Roskos, K., & Neuman, S. B. (2014). Best practices in reading: A 21st century skill update. The Reading Teacher, 67(7), 507-511. https://doi.org/10.1002/trtr.1248
- Statista Research Department. (2018, September). Frequency of book reading among adults in the Philippines in 2017. Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1000609/philippines-frequency-book-reading-adults/
- Tanjung, F. Z., Ridwan, R., & Gultom, U. A. (2017). Reading habits in digital era: A research on the students in Borneo university. LLT Journal: A Journal On Language And Language Teaching, 20(2), 147-157. https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v20i2.742
- Ventimiglia, P., & Pullman, G. (2016). From written to digital: The new literacy. EDUCAUSE Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2016/3/from-written-to-digital-the-new-literacy
- Walker, T. (2017, November 7). Students choose digital over print, but at what cost? NEA Today. https://www.nea.org/nea-today/all-news-articles/students-choose-digital-over-print-what-cost
- Wigfield, A., Tonks, S., & Eccles, J. S. (2004). Expectancy value theory in cross-cultural perspective. In D. M. McInerney & S. Van Etten (Eds.), Big theories revisited (vol. 4, pp. 165-198). Information Age Publishing. http://education-webfiles.s3-website-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/arp/garp/articles/eccles04d.pdf
- Wolpert-Gawron, H. (2018). Why choice matters to student learning. KQED. https://www.kqed.org/mindshift/52424/why-choice-matters-to-student-learning
- YPulse. (2020, March 16). Does Gen Z read books? Answering 4 big questions about the generation. https://www.ypulse.com/article/2020/03/16/does-gen-z-read-books-answering-5-big-questions-about-the-generation/