Published September 28, 2023 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Biodiversity Friendly Cities (Biofriendly City) as a New Concept Against Climate Change.

  • 1. Atatürk University, Faculty of Architecture and Design, Department of Landscape Architecture, Erzurum-Türkiye

Description

In the UN development report, it is stated that by the year 2050, nearly 70% of the global population will begin to live in urban areas. As a result of this, due to the increasing urban population both globally and in our country, various urbanization movements have emerged, leading to:

  • Rapid loss of urban green spaces and agricultural lands.
  • In cities, a multitude of environmental issues are being experienced, including transportation, infrastructure, energy, health, nutrition problems, air pollution, visual pollution, and solid waste,
  • Inadequate open and green spaces, obstruction of wind corridors, misguided urban planning, and the increasing reflection of light from glass and shiny surfaces in urban spaces contribute to the formation of urban heat islands,
  • Insufficient attention to natural and ecological thresholds in physical development results in cities suffering from difficult-to-reverse damage to natural ecosystems, rendering them vulnerable to disasters.

Urbanization leads to the deterioration of productive landscape areas such as urban green spaces and agricultural lands, fragmenting habitats and increasing pressure on urban biodiversity. Climate change scenarios, which are currently relevant and are expected to become a significant environmental issue in the future, are predicted to have ecological, economic, and sociological implications for urban ecosystems. Therefore, sustainability takes precedence in all urban planning decisions and physical developments. There is a growing need to maintain and expand biological diversity for more livable cities.

 

Urbanization destroys or alters local habitats while creating new infrastructure. Due to these changes, non-native species are gradually decreasing in urban landscapes. However, cities also give rise to diverse habitats and species, and especially in temperate cities, the diversity of vascular plants and birds can surpass that of surrounding landscapes. Nonetheless, the actual formation of a species depends on habitat presence and quality, spatial arrangements of habitats, species pools, the adaptability of a species, and its natural history and area history (Müller et al., 2013).

According to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), global temperatures have already risen by 1.1°C, and this change is progressing towards 1.5°C. In recent years, significant efforts have been made by the United Nations (UN) to mitigate the pressures of climate change on both natural and cultural environments.

To mitigate the adverse effects of climate change on ecosystems:

  • The Quito Declaration on Sustainable Cities and Human Settlements was established in 2016 in Ecuador.
  • Focusing on environmental sustainability, well-connected open spaces, accessibility, safe green areas, and resilient urban planning and practices.
  • Improving and preserving urban ecosystems and environmental factors.
  • Protecting sensitive productive areas for sustainable land use, preserving urban agricultural areas, ensuring food security, and reducing environmental issues.
  • Decisions were made to protect urban agricultural areas and enhance urban biodiversity.
  • The Paris Agreement (COP21) was adopted in 2015 with the participation of 194 countries.
  • The UN Climate Change Conference (COP26) took place in Glasgow in 2021.
  • The 27th Conference of the Parties to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change was held in 2022 in Egypt with the participation of 190 countries. During this meeting, it was decided to develop action plans to keep global climate change at 1.5 degrees Celsius by the end of the century. Additionally, targets were set to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 43% by 2030, prevent deforestation, and provide financial support to developing countries for climate change impacts.

Files

ASUA Chapter_11.pdf

Files (1.5 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:5629c2b4cc4a3be70efe644eaaa25edf
1.5 MB Preview Download

Additional details

Related works

Documents
Book chapter: 10.5281/zenodo.8386052 (DOI)

References

  • Abd Elraouf, R, EL Mokadem, A ., Megahed, N., Eleinen, O. A.  Eltarabily, S. (2022). Evaluating urban outdoor thermal comfort: a validation of ENVI-met simulation through field measurement. Journal of Building Performance Simulation,15/2:268-286.
  • Alves, F. M., Gonçalves, A. & Enjuto, M. (2022). The use of envi-met for the assessment of nature-based solutions' potential benefits in Industrial Parks—A Case Study of Argales Industrial Park (Valladolid, Spain). Infrastructures, 7 (6), 85.
  • Aslan, B. G.  Yazıcı, K. (2016). Yeşil altyapı sistemlerinde mevcut uygulamalar. Ziraat Mühendisliği, (363), 31-37.
  • Aznarez, C., Svenning, J. C., Taveira, G., Baró, F.  Pascual, U. (2022). Wildness and habitat quality drive spatial patterns of urban biodiversity. Landscape and Urban Planning, 228, 104570.
  • Balany, F., Muttil, N., Muthukumaran, S., Wong, M. S.  Ng, A.W. M,. (2022). Studying the effect of blue-green infrastructure on microclimate and human thermal comfort in Melbourne's Central Business District. Sustainability, 14(15), DOI 10.3390/su14159057.
  • Bartesaghi-Koc, C., Osmond, P. & Peters, A. (2020). Quantifying the seasonal cooling capacity of 'green infrastructure types' (GITs): An approach to assess and mitigate surface urban heat island in Sydney, Australia. Landscape and Urban Planning, 203, 103893.
  • Berthon K, Thomas, F.  Bekessy, S. (2021). The role of 'nativeness' in urban greening to support animal biodiversity. Landscape and Urban Planning, 205, 103959.
  • Chatzimentor, A., Apostolopoulou, E.  Mazaris, A. D. (2020). A review of green infrastructure research in Europe: Challenges and opportunities. Landscape and Urban Planning, 198, 103775.
  • Demir, Ü.  Aydın, A. (2020). Antalya Kurşunlu Şelalesi Tabiat Parkında insan aktivitelerinin böcek biyolojik çeşitliliğine etkisinin belirlenmesi. Turkish Journal of Forestry, 21 (4):349-354.
  • Dikmen, B.  Yılmaz, H. (2021). Erzurum kentsel açık yeşil alanlarında meyve ağaçlarının kullanımı. Atatürk Üniv. Ziraat Fak. Derg., 52(3,):262 – 272.
  • Fuller, R. A., Invine, K. N., Devine-Wright, P., Warren, P. H.  Gaston, K. J. (2007). Psychological benefits of green spaces increase with biodivinity. Biology Letters, 3(4): 390-384.
  • IPCC. (2021). Climate Change 2021. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1/.
  • Hepcan, Ç. C. (2019). https://www.iklimin.org/moduller/kentmodulu-yesilaltyapi.pdf.
  • Hoover, F. A., Meerow, S., Coleman, E., Grabowski, Z.  McPhearson, T. (2023). Why go green? Comparing rationales and planning criteria for green infrastructure in U.S. city plans. Landscape and Urban Planning. 237, 104781.
  • Liu, J.  Slik, F. (2021). Are street trees friendly to biodiversity? Landscape and Urban Planning, 218, 104304.
  • Liu, J., Zhao, Y., Si, X., Feng, G., Slik, F.  Zhang, J. (2021). University campuses as valuable resources for urban biodiversity research and conservation. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 64, 127255.
  • Kendal, D., Dobbs., C.  Lohr, V. I. (2014). Global patterns of diversity in the urban forest: Is there evidence to support the 10/20/30 rule? Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 13 (3):411-417..
  • Knapp, S., Aronson M. F. J., Carpenter, E., Herrera-Montes, A., Jung, K, Kotze, D. J., Sorte, F. A., Lepczyk, C. A., MacGregor-Fors, I., MacIvor, J, S., Moretti, M., Nilon, C, H, Piana, M, R., Rega-Brodsky, C. C., Salisbury, A., Threlfall, C. G., Trisos, C., Williams, N. S. G.  Hahs, A. K. (2021). A research agenda for urban biodiversity in the global extinction crisis. BioScience, 71(3):268–279.
  • Mell, I., Allin, S., Reimer, M.  Wilker, J. (2017). Strategic green infrastructure planning in Germany and the UK: a transnational evaluation of the evolution of urban greening policy and practice. J. Int. Planning Studies, 22, 4.
  • Middel, A., Chhetri, N.  Quay, R. (2015). Urban forestry and cool roofs: Assessment of heat mitigation strategies in Phoenix residential neighborhoods. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 14(1): 178-186.
  • Morpurgo, J., Remme, R. P.  Bodegom, P.V. (2020). CUGIC: The consolidated urban green ınfrastructure classification for assessing ecosystem services and biodiversity. Landscape and Urban Planning, 234, 104726.
  • Müller, N., Ignatieva, M., Nilon, J.  Werner, P. (2013). Patterns and Trends in Urban Biodiversity and Landscape DOI:10.1007/978-94-007-7088-1_10 'Urbanization, Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: Challenges and Opportunities', 123-174.
  • Ouyang, W. L., Morakinyo, T. E, Lee, Y., Tan, Z., Ren, C.  Ng, E. (2023). How to quantify the cooling effects of green infrastructure strategies from a spatio-temporal perspective: Experience from a parametric study. Landscape and Urban Planning, 237, 104808.
  • Parlak, E.  Atik, M. (2020). Dünyadan ve ülkemizden mavi – yeşil altyapı uygulamaları. Pemder Derg, 2 / 2: 86 – 100.
  • Peschardt, K.K, Stigsdotter, U.K,  Schipperrijn, J. (2016). Identifying features of pocket parks that may be related to healthy promoting use. Landscape Research, 41(1): 79-94.
  • Pyšek, P., Chocholoušková, Z., Pyšek, A., Jarošík, V., Chytrý, M.  Tichý, L. (2004). Trends in species diversity and composition of urban vegetation over three decades. Journal of Vegetation Science, 15: 781–788.
  • Sjöman, H., Morgenroth, J., Sjöman, J. D., Sæbø, A.  Kowarik, I. (2016). Diversification of the urban forest—Can we afford to exclude exotic tree species? Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 18: 237-241.
  • Sukopp, H.  Wurzel, A. (2003). The effects of climate change on the vegetation of central European cities. Urban Habitats, 1: 66–86.
  • Yılmaz, H., Demircioğlu, N.  Yılmaz, S. (2008). Effects of snow reflected light levels on human visual comfort. Environmental Monitoring and Assesment.144:367-375.
  • Yılmaz, S., Mutlu, E.  Yılmaz, H. (2018). Alternative scenarios for ecological urbanizations using ENVI-met model. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 25(26):26307-26321.
  • Yılmaz, S., Mutlu, B. E., Aksu, A., Mutlu, E.  Qaid, A. (2021). Street design scenarios using vegetation for sustainable thermal comfort in Erzurum, Turkey. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28 (3): 3672-3693.DOI 10.1007/s11356-020-10555-z.
  • Young, C., Hofmann, M., Frey, D., Moretti, M.  Nicole Bauer, N. (2020). Psychological restoration in urban gardens related to garden type, biodiversity and garden-related stress. Landscape and Urban Planning,198, 103777.
  • URL 1, 2023. https://unfccc.int/process-and-meetings/conferences/sharm-el-sheikh-climate-change-conference-november-2022/five-key-takeaways-from-cop27? Erişim tarihi; 29.05.2023.
  • URL 2. 2023. https://www.asla.org/greeninfrastructure.aspx
  • URL 3, 2023. https://www.kureselamaclar.org/, Erişim tarihi:29.05.2023