Ultrasound: A Gold Standard for Diagnosis of Septate Uterus
Creators
- 1. Department of Radiodiagnosis, People's College of Medical Sciences & Research Centre, Bhopa
Description
Septate uterus is commonest congenital uterine anomaly. Its mean incidence of uterine defects in the general population and in infertile women is 4.3% . It results from partial or complete failure of resorption of utero-vaginal septum after fusion of the para -mesonephric duct. Septum can be partial septum that involves the endometrial canal but not the cervix. Septum can be complete ,if it extends to either internal or external cervical os . A case of 25 year, female with history of amennorhea 7 months with G3P2L2 complaining of recurrent bleeding per vagina came in obstetrics department and referred for antenatal sonography (First Antenatal Scan) in radiology department is reported here.Antenatal scan in ultrasonography revealed : live fetus of 28 week 2 days with a septa separating the amniotic cavity into two cavities. Whole fetus was lying in right half of uterus with crowded fetal part, only both lower limbs of fetus along with part of umbilical cord were seen extending into the left half of uterus. The whole of amniotic fluid was seen in the left half of the uterus .Placenta was partially attached to the fetus. MRI confirmed the ultrasonography findings.
Files
88-90.pdf
Files
(186.8 kB)
Name | Size | Download all |
---|---|---|
md5:ca53232d5ea3a5360526a0a7598e397f
|
186.8 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
References
- 1. Chan YY, Jayaprakasan K, Tan A, Thornton JG, Coomarasamy A,Raine-Fenning NJ. Reproductive outcomes in women with congenital uterine anomalies: a systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Oct;38(4):371-82.
- 2. Breech LL, Laufer MR. Mu¨llerian anomalies Obstet Gynecol Clin NorthAm 2009;36:47-68
- 3. Ghi T, Casadio P, Kuleva M9, Perrone AM, Savelli L, Giunchi S,Meriggiola MC, Gubbini G, Pilu G, classification ofcongenital uterine anomalies. Fertil Steril 2009;92:808
- 4. Troiano RN, McCarthy SM. Mullerian duct anomalies: imaging and clinical issues. Radiology 2004; 233(1):19–34.
- 5. Deutch TD, Abuhamad AZ. The role of 3-dimensional ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of müllerian duct anomalies: a review of the literature. J Ultrasound Med 2008;27(3):413–423
- 6. Bermejo C, Martínez Ten P, Cantarero R, et al.. Threedimensional ultrasound in the diagnosis of Müllerian duct anomalies and concordance with magnetic resonance imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010;35(5):593–601.
- 7. Mueller GC, Hussain HK, Smith YR, et al.. Müllerian duct anomalies: comparison of MRI diagnosis and clinical diagnosis,AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007 189(6):1294–1302.
- 8. Bermejo C, Martinez TP, Cantarero R, Diaz D, Pe´rez Pedregosa J,Barro`n E, Labrador E, Ruiz Lo`pez L. Three-dimensional ultrasound in the diagnosis o Mullerian duct anomalies and concordance withmagnetic resonance imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2010; 35:593–601.