Published July 20, 2023 | Version v1
Taxonomic treatment Open

Celtis brieyi , De Wildeman 1920

  • 1. zamengo. botanic @ gmail. com; https: // orcid. org / 0000 - 0002 - 1681 - 6624
  • 2. Cátedra de Botánica, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, UNR, Campo Experimental Villarino, C. C. N ° 14, S 2125 ZAA, Zavalla, Santa Fe, Argentina. & IICAR (Instituto de Investigaciones en Ciencias Agrarias de Rosario), CONICET (Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas), Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, UNR, Campo Experimental Villarino, C. C. N ° 14, S 2125 ZAA, Zavalla, Santa Fe, Argentina.
  • 3. Instituto de Botânica, Herbarium SP, Avenida Miguel Stefano 3687, São Paulo, São Paulo, 04301 - 902, Brazil. & Universidade Estadual do Centro-Oeste, Plant Genetics and Molecular Biology Lab., Rua Salvatore Renna, 1606 - 1730, Santa Cruz, Guarapuava, Paraná, 85015 - 430, Brazil.
  • 4. leandro. pederneiras @ gmail. com; https: // orcid. org / 0000 - 0003 - 1822 - 227 X

Description

Celtis brieyi De Wildeman (1920: 111).

Type: — AFRICA. Congo Kinshasa, Region of Ganda-Sundi, 1911, fl., J. Briey 152 [BR: First-step lectotype, designated by Polhill in Kew Bull. 19(1): 140 (1964), as ‘holotype’. Second-step lectotype designated here, BR barcode 0000008968883!; isolectotypes BR barcode 0000008968234!, BR barcode 0000008968562!, BR barcode 0000008969217!].

Nomenclatural notes: —When describing C. brieyi, De Wildeman (1920) cited J. Briey 152 without specifying the herbarium in which specimens were conserved. Polhill (1964) reported that the “ holotype ” is in BR. By citing the herbarium Polhill (1964) performed an inadvertent lectotypification. Four samples are located in BR. Considering that in BR there are four samples and that Polhill (1964) did not specify the type, and that the citation by Sattarian et al. (2006) cannot be recognized as effective lectotypification (ICN Art. 7.11), we propose a second lectotypification step (ICN Art. 9.17) and designate the specimen at Herb. BR with barcode 0000008968883 as lectotype (ICN Art. 9.3), since this specimen has leaves and flowers, these being the characteristics used by De Wildeman (1920) to differentiate C. brieyi from C. adolfi-friderici.

Taxonomic notes: —Synonym of C. tessmannii (Sattarian et al. 2006).

Notes

Published as part of Zamengo, Henrique Borges, Chamorro, Debora, Gaglioti, André Luiz & Pederneiras, Leandro Cardoso, 2023, Nomenclatural revision of the names of Celtis (Cannabaceae) described for Africa, and lectotypification of one Asian name, pp. 205-223 in Phytotaxa 603 (3) on page 209, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.603.3.1, http://zenodo.org/record/8166665

Files

Files (1.8 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:515f17dd7ebbe09232131a3687f6f273
1.8 kB Download

System files (13.2 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:9fdda4380aa3bfafbc1f5f2debc58795
13.2 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

Biodiversity

Scientific name authorship
, De Wildeman
Kingdom
Plantae
Phylum
Tracheophyta
Order
Rosales
Family
Cannabaceae
Genus
Celtis
Species
brieyi
Taxon rank
species
Type status
isolectotype , lectotype
Taxonomic concept label
Celtis brieyi , 1920 sec. Zamengo, Chamorro, Gaglioti & Pederneiras, 2023

References

  • De Wildeman, E. A. J. (1920) Mission forestiere et agricole du comte Jacques de Briey, ingenieur agronome au Mayumbe (Congo belge). D. Reynaert, Bruxelles, 468 pp ..
  • Polhill, R. M. (1964) Enumeration of the Ulmaceae in Africa south of the Sahara. Kew Bulletin 19 (1): 139 - 145. https: // doi. org / 10.2307 / 4108304
  • Sattarian, A., Van der Maesen, L. J. G. & Wieringa, J. J. (2006) Chapter 7: Revision of African Celtis (Celtidaceae). In: Sattarian, A. Contribution to the biosystematics of Celtis L. (Celtidaceae) with special emphasis on the African species. Ph. D. thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen, pp. 65 - 92.