Published July 6, 2023
| Version v1
Dataset
Open
Meta-analysis and critical review of trophic discrimination factors (Δ13C and Δ15N): importance of tissue, trophic level, and diet source
- 1. East Tennessee State University
- 2. Stony Brook University
- 3. University of New Hampshire
Description
- Robustly quantifying dietary resource use and trophic position using stable isotopes requires accurate trophic discrimination factors (TDF; Δ13C and Δ15N for carbon and nitrogen, respectively), defined as the isotopic difference between consumer and diet. Early TDF studies converged on values of around 1.0‰ for Δ13C and 3.4‰ for Δ15N, but more recent work indicates that TDF values may be more nuanced, depending on taxa, tissues, trophic level, and diets. Yet, the relative importance of these factors remains unclear.
- Focusing on vertebrates (birds, fish, herptiles, and mammals), we conducted a literature review of 279 studies that estimated TDF values and used a Bayesian framework to determine how tissue type, trophic level, and diet source influence variation in Δ13C and Δ15N. Additionally, we reviewed 358 trophic ecology studies to determine if studies accounted for these factors during their TDF selection process.
- For Δ13C, vertebrates showed consistent patterns among tissue types (likely influenced by amino acid composition) and between trophic levels and diet sources (likely a result of dietary protein content and metabolic routing). Comparatively, for Δ15N, vertebrates showed considerable variation among tissue types and trophic levels, likely due to differences in tissue synthesis and physiological capabilities. Overall, Δ13C ranged from -5.1‰ to 9.1‰ and Δ15N from -3.3‰ to 9.7‰, underscoring that 1.0‰ for Δ13C and 3.4‰ for Δ15N are not universally appropriate. Moreover, both Δ13C and Δ15N varied by more than 9‰ within a single species and tissue type, demonstrating that using TDF values from the same, or similar, species may not be appropriate if diet and trophic level are not considered.
- Despite the importance of diet source on TDF values, most trophic ecology studies did not account for it. Further, most fish studies relied on literature review values that failed to account for tissue type, trophic level, and diet source. To aid ecologists in diet and trophic assessments of vertebrates, we used our meta-analysis to model taxon-specific TDF estimates (mean ± SD) for each tissue type, trophic level, and diet source combination. These more refined TDF values should improve ecological assessments that use stable isotopes.
Files
all_mean_sd_all_taxa_15_Mar_2023.csv
Files
(29.1 MB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:d96a4ca010a08ecd90a03e950d62b706
|
48.3 kB | Preview Download |
|
md5:f18c66919b576a51427aa3c0fdc9f030
|
26.4 MB | Preview Download |
|
md5:59107101077a9cde2f9f56cc8d3a493a
|
676 Bytes | Preview Download |
|
md5:a7b038f74d14941d4cffaad1aa38cfea
|
15.7 kB | Preview Download |
|
md5:41d49fd1b55cef4a3eb9c5269873e517
|
172.5 kB | Preview Download |
|
md5:7ba637e9a040b718ce4bfe4542feb6e7
|
2.1 MB | Preview Download |
|
md5:44547d3cfbf8c8777a87f5244b34f700
|
337.4 kB | Download |
Additional details
Related works
- Is derived from
- 10.5281/zenodo.8111154 (DOI)