About the Defamation & Wiretap of Jean Seberg - #Kristen Stewart - #Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W - #Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)

When disclosing limited & redacted records about the National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) Management Directive (MD-715) reporting obligations, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) confirmed never having discussed with the NEH [1] their function in the U.S government as an “independent federal agency created in 1965;” [2] the awards they have granted for “top-rated proposals examined by panels of independent, external reviewers;” [3] the grants they award “typically going to cultural institutions, such as museums, archives, libraries, colleges, universities, public television, radio stations, and to individual scholars;” [4] their decision to define the term “humanities” as “the study and interpretation of language, linguistics, literature, history, jurisprudence, philosophy, archaeology, comparative religion, ethics etc;” [5] Jean Seberg’s membership with the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP); [6] Jean Seberg’s charitable donations to the NAACP and the Black Panther Party; [7] the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) wiretap of Jean Seberg; [8] the mental health impact of wiretap on Jean Seberg; [9] the mental health impact of libelous articles (published by the Los Angeles Times and Newsweek) on Jean Seberg; [10] the circumstances surrounding the suspicious death of Jean Seberg when she was only 40 years old; [11] the performance of Kristen Stewart in the 2019 movie entitled: “Seberg.”

Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W does find it odd that the NEH would publish a summary of Jean Seberg's biography on their website without internally discussing the matter among themselves. The AACL also finds it strange that the NEH would publish a summary of Jean Seberg's biography without contacting [1] the non-profit organizations they say she was close to; [2] the Department of Justice (DOJ) Federal Bureau of Investigation, who they say were responsible for her wiretap; [3] the Los Angeles Times and other news outlets that have gone on to (i) smear her good name, (ii) adversely impact her mental health, (iii) make being an anti-racist seem as if it was a "bad thing."

It is the judgment of Michael A. Ayele that the processing of the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request, which was assigned by the NEH Case No.: 22 - 26 was very bizarre. Even though the NEH say that they [1] are an independent federal agency created in 1965; [2] are responsible for the processing of application of grants submitted to them by museums, archives, libraries, colleges, universities, public television, radio stations, individual scholars etc; [3] have defined the term "humanities" as "the study and interpretations of language, linguistics, literature, history, jurisprudence, philosophy, archaeology, comparative religion, ethics, etc;" Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W was unable to independently confirm this. Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W deeply regrets the NEH processing of the FOIA Request assigned Case No.: 22 - 26 as much as it regrets the processing of the FOIA appeal assigned Case No.: 22 - A - 01 because the processing of the FOIA request (and the FOIA appeal) further undermined public confidence in the mission of their agency.

Be well. Take care. Keep yourselves at arms distance. 

Michael A. Ayele (a.k.a) W

Anti-Racist Human Rights Activist

Audio-Visual Media Analyst

Anti-Propaganda Journalist