Published July 7, 2023 | Version 1.0
Dataset Open

Life Cycle Inventories (LCI) for Off-grid Hybrid Energy Systems using Photovoltaics, Batteries, and Hydrogen Storage

  • 1. Isabelle
  • 2. Li
  • 3. Luis Eduardo
  • 4. Marianne
  • 5. Sabrina

Contributors

Contact person:

  • 1. University of Oslo, Department of Technology Systems
  • 2. University Utrecht

Description

This dataset is a collection of life cycle inventories (LCI) / activity datasets for calculating the environmental impact of an off-grid hybrid energy system in Chile. Different energy system setups are compared which can contain diesel generators, photovoltaic (PV) panels, lithium-ion (Li-ion) batteries and/or hydrogen energy storage.

In PV production, we refer to Frischknecht et al. (2020)’s LCIs. This includes the production of PV cells, made from silicon wafers based on Czochralski single silicon crystals. PV modules are formed by connecting multiple PV cells. Regarding Li-ion batteries, we relied on Porzio and Scown (2021)’s LCI, which included a LiFePO4-based cathode and a graphite-based anode. Additionally, we employed Quan et al. (2022)’s inventories for the production of LiFePO4 from lithium carbonate and iron phosphate. 

In the hydrogen system, LCIs are based on Koj et al. (2017) for the alkaline electrolyzer with a Zirkon membrane, on Boureima et al. (2011) and Wulf et al. (2018) for the steel-based compressed gas hydrogen storage tank, and on Notter et al. (2015) and Weber et al. (2018) for the proton-exchange membrane fuel cell with a Nafion membrane.

These datasets were curated for the specific case of building an energy system to supply an off-grid telescope in the Atacama desert, Chile, to be built in 2030. We incorporate specific temporal and country-specific power mixes for production locations next to transportation pathways from these to the energy system area in Chile.

PROCESS FLOW
Scenario setup

Reference Diesel generator only
PDB Diesel & Photovoltaics
PDB Diesel & Photovoltaics & Battery
PB PV & Battery
PDBH Diesel & Photovoltaics & Battery & Hydrogen
PBH  Photovoltaics & Battery & Hydrogen

List of the unit processes:

1. mc-Si PV panel, production
2. LFP battery, production
3a. Alkaline electrolyzer, production
3b. CG H2 storage, production
3c. PEMFC, production
4. Subterranean power line, production
5. Power mixes production countries, 2030
6. Transportation from production to energy system site
7. Operation and maintenance
8. Scenario calculations

Functional unit:

Deliver power to the telescope according to the demand forecasted, 7.99GWh/year over 25 years.

 

Installed capacities and generated power from the Energy System Optimization Model highRES-AtLAST:

name LCOE Capa Diesel Capa PV Capa Alkaline Capa CG Capa PEMFC Capa LFP10HR Gen Diesel Gen PV Gen PEMFC Gen LFP
Reference 207,5715 1,620512 0 0 0 0 0 7798,218 0 0 0
PDB 144,567679 1,580879 2,376101 0 0 0 0 4594,864509 3203,354384 0 0
PDB 116,9578 0,464203 4,737296 0 0 0 1,692225 434,6134 7783,02 0 3868,37
PB 145,1621 0 7,156425 0 0 0 2,400644 0 8251,438 0 4179,864
PDBH 116,3271 0,454849 4,777302 0,625617 95,56199 0,122606 1,478635 409,4592 8453,336 390,7853 3500,494
PBH 132,2926 0 6,746377 1,475131 586,2435 0,336383 1,535754 0 9130,062 533,2744 3661,686

 

For more detailed description of the setup of this dataset, refer to Viole et al. (2023): Sustainable Astronomy: A comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Off-grid Hybrid Energy Systems to supply large Telescopes, https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3281965/v2

Files

1_Photovoltaics.csv

Files (739.4 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:589f05c0e0a00346981ab106bc5f739e
17.3 kB Preview Download
md5:2fa97d3f874dd33069702c62fc3798ec
9.0 kB Preview Download
md5:f64fa0fcf8eadce779ba9e5735fd88dd
4.4 kB Preview Download
md5:3ad4bd0cf0a3406a1d2fb67fe9f651ed
28.8 kB Preview Download
md5:789e181d9cdf34bbdafbf14923fff2ed
8.8 kB Preview Download
md5:31acaa1d92ab7f7f54b2c7d32f975203
2.6 kB Preview Download
md5:952c18305f63dfbf234720bc6906f381
14.8 kB Preview Download
md5:1279e95a7e62fc9ea29c2cb77bf90f98
3.0 kB Preview Download
md5:70567115a36cab8649ae6c3cb7a7a6bf
24.9 kB Preview Download
md5:e2d33d9069fdd1e4a027d9cdd98ae36a
9.5 kB Preview Download
md5:2b21863ca7bf1378f28c993484b3e96b
616.4 kB Download

Additional details

Related works

Is cited by
Poster: 10.5194/egusphere-egu23-14734 (DOI)
Is described by
Preprint: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3281965/v2 (DOI)

Funding

European Commission
AtLAST - Towards an Atacama Large Aperture Submillimeter Telescope 951815

Dates

Available
2024-01-08

References

  • Arvesen A, Hauan IB, Bolsøy BM, Hertwich EG (2015) Life cycle assessment of transport of electricity via different voltage levels: A case study for Nord-Trøndelag county in Norway. Applied Energy 157:144–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.08.013
  • Boureima F-S, Wynen V, Sergeant N, et al (2011) CLEVER Clean Vehicles Research: LCA and Policy Measures. LCA report. Belgian Science Policy, Brussels, Belgium
  • Frischknecht R, Stolz P, Krebs L, et al (2020) Life Cycle Inventories and Life Cycle Assessments of Photovoltaic Systems. International Energy Agency (IEA), France, Paris
  • Koj J, Wulf C, Schreiber A, Zapp P (2017) Site-Dependent Environmental Impacts of Industrial Hydrogen Production by Alkaline Water Electrolysis. Energies 10:860. https://doi.org/10.3390/en10070860
  • Notter DA, Kouravelou K, Karachalios T, et al (2015) Life cycle assessment of PEM FC applications: electric mobility and μ-CHP. Energy Environ Sci 8:1969–1985. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5EE01082A
  • Porzio J, Scown CD (2021) Life‐Cycle Assessment Considerations for Batteries and Battery Materials. Advanced Energy Materials 11:2100771. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202100771
  • Quan J, Zhao S, Song D, et al (2022) Comparative life cycle assessment of LFP and NCM batteries including the secondary use and different recycling technologies. Science of The Total Environment 819:153105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153105
  • Weber S, Peters JF, Baumann M, Weil M (2018) Life Cycle Assessment of a Vanadium Redox Flow Battery. Environ Sci Technol 52:10864–10873. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b02073
  • Wulf C, Reuß M, Grube T, et al (2018) Life Cycle Assessment of hydrogen transport and distribution options. Journal of Cleaner Production 199:431–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.180