Life Cycle Inventories (LCI) for Off-grid Hybrid Energy Systems using Photovoltaics, Batteries, and Hydrogen Storage
Creators
- 1. Isabelle
- 2. Li
- 3. Luis Eduardo
- 4. Marianne
- 5. Sabrina
- 1. University of Oslo, Department of Technology Systems
- 2. University Utrecht
Description
This dataset is a collection of life cycle inventories (LCI) / activity datasets for calculating the environmental impact of an off-grid hybrid energy system in Chile. Different energy system setups are compared which can contain diesel generators, photovoltaic (PV) panels, lithium-ion (Li-ion) batteries and/or hydrogen energy storage.
In PV production, we refer to Frischknecht et al. (2020)’s LCIs. This includes the production of PV cells, made from silicon wafers based on Czochralski single silicon crystals. PV modules are formed by connecting multiple PV cells. Regarding Li-ion batteries, we relied on Porzio and Scown (2021)’s LCI, which included a LiFePO4-based cathode and a graphite-based anode. Additionally, we employed Quan et al. (2022)’s inventories for the production of LiFePO4 from lithium carbonate and iron phosphate.
In the hydrogen system, LCIs are based on Koj et al. (2017) for the alkaline electrolyzer with a Zirkon membrane, on Boureima et al. (2011) and Wulf et al. (2018) for the steel-based compressed gas hydrogen storage tank, and on Notter et al. (2015) and Weber et al. (2018) for the proton-exchange membrane fuel cell with a Nafion membrane.
These datasets were curated for the specific case of building an energy system to supply an off-grid telescope in the Atacama desert, Chile, to be built in 2030. We incorporate specific temporal and country-specific power mixes for production locations next to transportation pathways from these to the energy system area in Chile.
PROCESS FLOW
Scenario setup
Reference | Diesel generator only |
PDB | Diesel & Photovoltaics |
PDB | Diesel & Photovoltaics & Battery |
PB | PV & Battery |
PDBH | Diesel & Photovoltaics & Battery & Hydrogen |
PBH | Photovoltaics & Battery & Hydrogen |
List of the unit processes:
1. | mc-Si PV panel, production |
2. | LFP battery, production |
3a. | Alkaline electrolyzer, production |
3b. | CG H2 storage, production |
3c. | PEMFC, production |
4. | Subterranean power line, production |
5. | Power mixes production countries, 2030 |
6. | Transportation from production to energy system site |
7. | Operation and maintenance |
8. | Scenario calculations |
Functional unit:
Deliver power to the telescope according to the demand forecasted, 7.99GWh/year over 25 years.
Installed capacities and generated power from the Energy System Optimization Model highRES-AtLAST:
name | LCOE | Capa Diesel | Capa PV | Capa Alkaline | Capa CG | Capa PEMFC | Capa LFP10HR | Gen Diesel | Gen PV | Gen PEMFC | Gen LFP |
Reference | 207,5715 | 1,620512 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7798,218 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
PDB | 144,567679 | 1,580879 | 2,376101 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4594,864509 | 3203,354384 | 0 | 0 |
PDB | 116,9578 | 0,464203 | 4,737296 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1,692225 | 434,6134 | 7783,02 | 0 | 3868,37 |
PB | 145,1621 | 0 | 7,156425 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2,400644 | 0 | 8251,438 | 0 | 4179,864 |
PDBH | 116,3271 | 0,454849 | 4,777302 | 0,625617 | 95,56199 | 0,122606 | 1,478635 | 409,4592 | 8453,336 | 390,7853 | 3500,494 |
PBH | 132,2926 | 0 | 6,746377 | 1,475131 | 586,2435 | 0,336383 | 1,535754 | 0 | 9130,062 | 533,2744 | 3661,686 |
For more detailed description of the setup of this dataset, refer to Viole et al. (2023): Sustainable Astronomy: A comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Off-grid Hybrid Energy Systems to supply large Telescopes, https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3281965/v2
Files
1_Photovoltaics.csv
Files
(739.4 kB)
Name | Size | Download all |
---|---|---|
md5:589f05c0e0a00346981ab106bc5f739e
|
17.3 kB | Preview Download |
md5:2fa97d3f874dd33069702c62fc3798ec
|
9.0 kB | Preview Download |
md5:f64fa0fcf8eadce779ba9e5735fd88dd
|
4.4 kB | Preview Download |
md5:3ad4bd0cf0a3406a1d2fb67fe9f651ed
|
28.8 kB | Preview Download |
md5:789e181d9cdf34bbdafbf14923fff2ed
|
8.8 kB | Preview Download |
md5:31acaa1d92ab7f7f54b2c7d32f975203
|
2.6 kB | Preview Download |
md5:952c18305f63dfbf234720bc6906f381
|
14.8 kB | Preview Download |
md5:1279e95a7e62fc9ea29c2cb77bf90f98
|
3.0 kB | Preview Download |
md5:70567115a36cab8649ae6c3cb7a7a6bf
|
24.9 kB | Preview Download |
md5:e2d33d9069fdd1e4a027d9cdd98ae36a
|
9.5 kB | Preview Download |
md5:2b21863ca7bf1378f28c993484b3e96b
|
616.4 kB | Download |
Additional details
Related works
- Is cited by
- Poster: 10.5194/egusphere-egu23-14734 (DOI)
- Is described by
- Preprint: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3281965/v2 (DOI)
Funding
Dates
- Available
-
2024-01-08
References
- Arvesen A, Hauan IB, Bolsøy BM, Hertwich EG (2015) Life cycle assessment of transport of electricity via different voltage levels: A case study for Nord-Trøndelag county in Norway. Applied Energy 157:144–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.08.013
- Boureima F-S, Wynen V, Sergeant N, et al (2011) CLEVER Clean Vehicles Research: LCA and Policy Measures. LCA report. Belgian Science Policy, Brussels, Belgium
- Frischknecht R, Stolz P, Krebs L, et al (2020) Life Cycle Inventories and Life Cycle Assessments of Photovoltaic Systems. International Energy Agency (IEA), France, Paris
- Koj J, Wulf C, Schreiber A, Zapp P (2017) Site-Dependent Environmental Impacts of Industrial Hydrogen Production by Alkaline Water Electrolysis. Energies 10:860. https://doi.org/10.3390/en10070860
- Notter DA, Kouravelou K, Karachalios T, et al (2015) Life cycle assessment of PEM FC applications: electric mobility and μ-CHP. Energy Environ Sci 8:1969–1985. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5EE01082A
- Porzio J, Scown CD (2021) Life‐Cycle Assessment Considerations for Batteries and Battery Materials. Advanced Energy Materials 11:2100771. https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202100771
- Quan J, Zhao S, Song D, et al (2022) Comparative life cycle assessment of LFP and NCM batteries including the secondary use and different recycling technologies. Science of The Total Environment 819:153105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153105
- Weber S, Peters JF, Baumann M, Weil M (2018) Life Cycle Assessment of a Vanadium Redox Flow Battery. Environ Sci Technol 52:10864–10873. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.8b02073
- Wulf C, Reuß M, Grube T, et al (2018) Life Cycle Assessment of hydrogen transport and distribution options. Journal of Cleaner Production 199:431–443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.07.180