FSW RDM
Published June 9, 2023 | Version v1
Presentation Open

Rethinking scholarly communication and knowledge sharing in the age of Open Science

Authors/Creators

  • 1. Centre for Science and Technology Studies (CWTS), Leiden University
  • 2. Faculty of Social Sciences (FSW), Leiden University

Description

These are slides from a joint keynote lecture delivered at the Institute of Public Administration Research Conference (Faculty of Governance and Global Affairs, Leiden University), held at the Nutshuis in Den Haag, NL on 8 June 2023. The lecture approaches the  topic of Open Science from two specific angles: Scholarly Publishing and Research Data Management. In doing so, we make a call to 'open up' both scholarly publishing, e.g., through the use of preprint servers, publishing and contributing to alternative modes of peer review; as well as research data management, e.g., by enabling epistemically diverse versions of openness that center domain-specific (meta)data sharing practices (Poirier et al. 2020) and, more broadly, the cultivation of 'judicious connections' (Leonelli 2023) among researchers and other concerned actors.

Files

20230608_WaltmanHoffman_FGGA-BSK_OpenScienceSlides.pdf

Files (10.8 MB)

Additional details

References

  • DSW. (2022). Guidelines for the archiving of academic research for faculties of Behavioural and Social Sciences in the Netherlands. Committee Scientific Integrity, Data Storage and Reproducibility. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7583831
  • Leonelli, S. (2023). Philosophy of Open Science (Preprint No. 21986). PhilSci. http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/21986/
  • Lichterman, P., & Eliasoph, N. (2014). Civic Action. American Journal of Sociology, 120(3), 798–863. https://doi.org/10.1086/679189
  • Mons, B., Neylon, C., Velterop, J., Dumontier, M., da Silva Santos, L. O. B., & Wilkinson, M. D. (2017). Cloudy, increasingly FAIR; revisiting the FAIR Data guiding principles for the European Open Science Cloud. Information Services & Use, 37(1), 49–56. https://doi.org/10.3233/ISU-170824
  • Mulligan, C. J., Boyer, D. M., Turner, T. R., Delson, E., & Leonard, W. R. (2022). Data sharing in biological anthropology. American Journal of Biological Anthropology, 178(S74), 26–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.24499
  • Pels, P., Boog, I., Henrike Florusbosch, J., Kripe, Z., Minter, T., Postma, M., Sleeboom-Faulkner, M., Simpson, B., Dilger, H., Schönhuth, M., von Poser, A., Castillo, R. C. A., Lederman, R., & Richards-Rissetto, H. (2018). Data management in anthropology: The next phase in ethics governance? Social Anthropology, 26(3), 391–413. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8676.12526
  • Poirier, L., Fortun, K., Costelloe-Kuehn, B., & Fortun, M. (2020). Metadata, Digital Infrastructure, and the Data Ideologies of Cultural Anthropology. In J. W. Crowder, M. Fortun, R. Besara, & L. Poirier (Eds.), Anthropological Data in the Digital Age: New Possibilities – New Challenges (pp. 209–237). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24925-0_10
  • Verburg, M., Braukmann, R., Mahabier, W., & pour, K. K. (2023). Reuse of qualitative research data—Community developments and needs. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7704480
  • Verheul, I., Imming, M., Ringerma, J., Mordant, A., Ploeg, J.-L. van der, & Pronk, M. (2019). Data Stewardship on the map: A study of tasks and roles in Dutch research institutes. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2669150
  • Wilkinson, M. D., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, Ij. J., Appleton, G., Axton, M., Baak, A., Blomberg, N., Boiten, J.-W., da Silva Santos, L. B., Bourne, P. E., Bouwman, J., Brookes, A. J., Clark, T., Crosas, M., Dillo, I., Dumon, O., Edmunds, S., Evelo, C. T., Finkers, R., … Mons, B. (2016). The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data, 3(1), 160018. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18