Strotarchus chamevazquezi Cubas-Rodriguez & Bonaldo & Brescovit 2023, sp. nov.
- 1. Museo de Entomología, Escuela de Biología, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Honduras, Departamento Francisco Morazán, Tegucigalpa, 1101, Honduras. & alexmcubas @ gmail. com; https: // orcid. org / 0000 - 0001 - 6426 - 1101
- 2. Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi, MPEG, Coordenação de Zoologia, Laboratório de Aracnologia, Avenida Perimetral, 1901, Terra Firme, CEP: 66077 - 830, Belém, Pará, Brazil. & bonaldo @ museu-goeldi. br; https: // orcid. org / 0000 - 0002 - 8216 - 5110
- 3. Laboratório de Coleçƚes Zoológicas, Instituto Butantan, Av. Vital Brasil, 1500, São Paulo, SP, 05503 - 900, Brazil. & antonio. brescovit @ butantan. gov. br; https: // orcid. org / 0000 - 0002 - 1511 - 5324
Description
Strotarchus chamevazquezi sp. nov.
Type material. Holotype ♁ and paratype ♀ from La Bodega (13°56’40.7”N 87°13’23.9”W), Santa Ana, Francisco Morazán, Honduras, June 20, 2021, leg. A. Cubas (IBSP 324813). Paratype: one ♁ with same data as holotype (IBSP 324814).
Other material examined. HONDURAS: Francisco Morazán: Santa Ana, La Bodega (13°56’40.7”N 87°13’23.9”W), 1♁ (IBSP 324816); 1♁ 1♀ (IBPS 324815, SEM).
Etymology. The specific epithet is in honor of Dr. David Chamé-Vázquez (CIBNOR, México), for his great contributions to the study of the Mexican spider fauna and his great importance as a mentor in spider research for the first author.
Diagnosis. The males of Strotarchus chamevazquezi sp. nov. resemble those of S. minor Banks, 1909 by the presence of a basal embolar fold that crosses the apical portion of the tegulum, by the long embolus that arises retrolaterally, and by an extremely long cymbium (see Bonaldo et al. 2012: figs 103–104). They are differentiated by the absence of either ppRTA and laRTA (see Bonaldo et al. 2012: figs 103–104), by the arrow-shaped retrolateral tibial apophysis apices in ventral view (square in retrolateral view), and by the balloon-shaped embolar base (Figs 1D, 3A, 3B, 4C). Females resemble those of S. minor by the elliptical atrium (see Bonaldo et al. 2012: fig. 105) but differ by the parallel copulatory ducts, converging abruptly toward the spermathecae, and by the lateral margin of anterior atrium superposed to the atrial posterior margin (Figs 3C, 3D).
Description. Male (Holotype). Carapace light brown (Fig. 1A), labium, endites and sternum lighter than carapace, head region and chelicerae reddish-brown, legs light yellow, opisthosoma cream, striated with narrow yellowish-brown bands. Total length 5.19. Carapace 2.5 long, 1.74, wide. Eye diameters: AME 0.22, ALE 0.16, PME 0.19, PLE 0.20. Chelicerae with 3 promarginal teeth, the median largest, and 2 retromarginal teeth, separated by twice their width (Fig. 4A). Leg measurements: femur I 1.71/ II 1.22/ III 1.49/ IV 2.05. Leg spination: I—femur d1-1-1, p0-0-1, r0; tibia d0, p0, r0-0-1, v2-0-2; metatarsus d0, p1-1-1, r0-1-1, v2-2-2. II—femur d1-1-1, p0, r0-1-1; tibia d0-0-1, p0, r1-1-1, v1-2-0; metatarsus d0-1-0, p1-1-1, r1-1-1, v2-1-2. III—femur d1-1-1, p0-1-1, r1-1-1; tibia d0-0-1, p0-1-1, r0-1-1, v2-2-0; metatarsus d0-1-0, p1-1-1, r1-1-1, v2-2- 1m. IV—femur d1-0-1, p0-0-1, r0- 0-1; tibia d0, p0-1-1, r0-0-1, v2-2-2; metatarsus d0-1-1, p1-1-1, r0-1-1, v2-1-2. Palpal tibia ca. 1/3 of cymbium length, cymbium long, curved medially and ovoid-shaped in basal third; retrolateral tibial apophysis flattened and enlarged, apex sharp or blunt (Fig. 4B); ppRTA and laRTA absent. Tegulum rounded, proximal fold of reservoir thick, Vshaped; tegular apophysis inserted ventrally on prolateral side of tegulum; embolar base visible retrolaterally as concave area on expanded palp (Fig. 1D); basal embolar fold not clearly visible (Figs 1C, 3B), connecting with small portion of tegulum but displaced obliquely; embolar process small, rounded (Figs 1B, 3A, 4D).
Female (Paratype, IBSP 324813). Coloration as in male, except with darker carapace (Fig. 2A). Total length 6.52. Carapace 2.62 long, 2.0. Eye diameters: AME 0.25, ALE 0.16, PME 0.20, PLE 0.24. Chelicerae with promarginal teeth as in male and 2 retromarginal teeth, separated by three times their width (Fig. 4E). Leg measurements: femur I 1.61/ II 1.57/ III 1.41/ IV 2.10. Leg spination: I—femur d1-0-1, p0-0-2, r0; tibia d0, p0-0-1, r0-0-1, v2-2- 0; metatarsus d0, p0-0-1, r0, v2-2-0. II—femur d1-1-1, p1-1-0, r0; tibia d0, p0-0-1, r0-0-1, v2-2-0; metatarsus d0, p0-0-1, r0-1-1, v2-2-1. III—femur d1-1-1, p1-1-1, r0-0-1, v0; tibia d0-0-1, p1-1-0, r1-1-0, v1p-2-0; metatarsus d0, p1-1-1, r1-1-1, v2-2- 0. IV—femur d1-1-1, p0-0-1, r0-0-1; tibia d0-0-1, p0-1-1, r0-1-1, v2-0-2; metatarsus d0-2-2, p1-1-1, r1-1-1, v2-2-2. Epigynum with wide, narrow atrium with laterally projecting edges (Fig. 2B); atrial pocket large, oval posteriorly, median slit without lateral notches, rounded anteriorly (Figs 2D, 3D). Copulatory ducts with helicoid folds; glandular knob small, nearly triangular, projected distally; spermathecae enlarged posteriorly, curved boot-shaped; spermathecae continuous with spermathecae stalk (Figs 2 C-D, 3E-F, 4F)
Variation. Three males: Total length 5.19 − 5.60, carapace 2.50 − 2.70, femur I 1.71 − 1.85.
Natural history. The specimens were captured manually in wild areas and inside houses in La Bodega. Distribution. Known only from the type locality, Santa Ana, Francisco Morazán, Honduras (Fig. 5).
Notes
Files
Files
(5.3 kB)
Name | Size | Download all |
---|---|---|
md5:74265e0e93ac1bea86ab720f51f42f05
|
5.3 kB | Download |
System files
(38.8 kB)
Name | Size | Download all |
---|---|---|
md5:982a2f4b6c786aa57a117cf01e501bc8
|
38.8 kB | Download |
Linked records
Additional details
Identifiers
Biodiversity
- Event date
- 2021-06-20
- Family
- Cheiracanthiidae
- Genus
- Strotarchus
- Kingdom
- Animalia
- Order
- Araneae
- Phylum
- Arthropoda
- Scientific name authorship
- Cubas-Rodriguez & Bonaldo & Brescovit
- Species
- chamevazquezi
- Taxonomic status
- sp. nov.
- Taxon rank
- species
- Type status
- holotype
- Verbatim event date
- 2021-06-20
- Taxonomic concept label
- Strotarchus chamevazquezi Cubas-Rodriguez, Bonaldo & Brescovit, 2023
References
- Banks, N. (1909) Arachnida from Costa Rica. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 61, 194 - 234.
- Bonaldo, A. B., Saturnino, R., Ramirez, M. J. & Brescovit, A. D. (2012) A revision of the American spider genus Strotarchus Simon, 1888 (Araneae: Dionycha, Systariinae). Zootaxa, 3363 (1), 1 - 37. https: // doi. org / 10.11646 / zootaxa. 3363.1.1