Published April 24, 2023 | Version v1
Dataset Open

Data from: Reciprocal transplants reveal asymmetric local adaptation of Himalayan Rhododendron approaching elevational range limit

  • 1. Chesapeake Conservancy*
  • 2. University of Idaho
  • 3. College of Applied Sciences Nepal*
  • 4. Plymouth University
  • 5. CNRS Theoretical and Experimental Ecology Station*
  • 6. Baylor University

Description

As plant species expand their upper limit of distribution under current warming, some retain both traditional climate space and biotic environment while others encounter novel conditions.  The latter is the case for Rhododendron campanulatum,a woody shrub that grows both above and below treeline at our study site in the Eastern Himalaya where a very conspicuous, stable treeline was defined by a nearly contiguous canopy of tall Abies spectabilis trees, many of them over a century old.  Prior work showed that treeline had remained static in this region while R. campanulatum expanded its elevational range limit. We tested local adaptation of R. campanulatum by performing reciprocal transplants between the species' current elevational range limit (4023masl) and just above treeline (3876 masl). Contrary to expectation, the coldest temperatures of late winter and early-mid spring were experienced by plants at the lower elevation: R. campanulatum at species' limit (upper site) were covered by snow for a longer period (40 more days) and escaped the coldest temperatures suffered by conspecifics at treeline (lower site). The harsher spring conditions at treeline likely explains why leaves were smaller at treeline (15.3 cm2) than at species-limit (21.3 cm2). Contrary to results from equivalent studies in other regions, survival was reduced more by downslope than by upslope movement, again potentially due to extreme cold temperatures observed at treeline in spring.  Upslope transplantation had no effect on mortality, but mortality of species-limit saplings transplanted downslope was three times higher than that of residents at both sites.  A general expectation is that locals should survive better than foreign transplants, but survival of locals and immigrants at our species-limit site was identical. However, those species-limit saplings that survive the transplant to treeline grew faster than both locals at treeline and the transplants at species-limit. Overall, we found asymmetric adaptation: compared to treeline saplings, those at species-limit (147 m above treeline) were more tolerant of extremes in the growing season but less tolerant of extremes in winter and early-mid spring, displaying local adaptation in a more complex manner than simply home advantage, and complicating predictions about impacts of future regional climate change.

Notes

Any program can be used that reads excel and csv files. However, we have also provided R code to process and analyze the data, and plot the output.

Funding provided by: National Science Foundation
Crossref Funder Registry ID: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000001
Award Number: DEB-1210767

Funding provided by: University of Texas at Austin Graduate Program in Ecology, Evolution and Behavior*
Crossref Funder Registry ID:
Award Number:

Funding provided by: National Science Foundation
Crossref Funder Registry ID: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000001
Award Number: 1049208

Funding provided by: U.S. Department of Energy
Crossref Funder Registry ID: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000015
Award Number: 09-NICCR-1077

Files

mortalityData.csv

Files (417.1 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:9b983063ba75263ddcf60eba0612a404
120 Bytes Preview Download
md5:e43504a7341e9bab2e596d3fba1c6cc6
6.7 kB Preview Download
md5:8af95044f7895d1732b1723fbc47af11
56.8 kB Download
md5:0ea645f1c94c3fdac7e027984c9c5f92
176.9 kB Preview Download
md5:243b661495ce15a76f086ce327c06038
176.6 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Related works

Is derived from
10.5281/zenodo.7726683 (DOI)