Published December 5, 2018 | Version 1.2.0
Dataset Open

ELABORATION OF THE ITALIAN PORTION OF THE GLOBAL SOIL ORGANIC CARBON MAP (GSOCMAP)

  • 1. Consiglio per la ricerca in agricoltura e l'analisi dell'economia agraria (CREA)
  • 2. Istituto per la bioeconomia , Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Firenze
  • 3. Istituto per la bioeconomia , ConsiglioNazionale delle Ricerche, Firenze
  • 4. Agenzia Regionale per la Prevenzione e Protezione Ambientale del Veneto
  • 5. Università degli Studi Mediterranea di Reggio Calabria
  • 6. Università di Verona
  • 7. Ente Regionale per I Servizi all'Agricoltura e alle Foreste Lombardia
  • 8. Servizio Geologico sismico e dei suoli Regione Emilia-Romagna
  • 9. Istituto per le Piante da Legno e l'Ambiente Piemonte
  • 10. Consorzio Lamma Toscana
  • 11. Agenzia regionale per lo Sviluppo Rurale del Friuli Venezia Giulia
  • 12. Regione Liguria
  • 13. Regione Marche
  • 14. Azienda Regionale per Lo Sviluppo dell'Agricoltura Calabria
  • 15. Regione Puglia
  • 16. Regione Campania
  • 17. Regione Siciliana
  • 18. Istituto superiore per la protezione e la ricerca ambientale
  • 19. Istituto per lo Studio degli Ecosistemi, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche
  • 1. CREA Consiglio per la ricerca in agricoltura e l'analisi dell'economia agraria

Description

The Global Soil Organic Carbon map (GSOCmap) published by the Food and Agriculture Organization
constitutes a baseline estimation of soil organic carbon stock (CS, ton ha–1) from 0 to 30 cm, on a grid at 30 arc-seconds
resolution (approximately 1 x 1 km). It has been produced for the Italian territory by the Italian Soil Partnership (ISP): a
national hub of institutions dealing with soils, either academic/research institutions, and regional soil services (RSS). The
RSS are the main soil data owners in Italy and play a central role in the elaboration of policies for soil management. The
RSS adhering to the ISP are: Calabria, Campania, Emilia Romagna, Friuli Venezia Giulia, Liguria, Lombardia, Marche,
Piemonte, Puglia, Sicilia, Toscana, and Veneto. A national soil database is maintained by the Consiglio per la Ricerca e
l'Analisi dell'Economia Agraria (CREA). The RSS contributed with soil data, with mean density of 1 point per 50 square
kilometres, selecting data analysed for soil organic carbon content (SOC, dag kg-1), which were representative and well
distributed for the following environmental covariates: land use, geomorphology, and climate. The data were selected inbetween
1990 al 2013. This was necessary in order to exclude the effect of the new soil protection policies of the Rural
Development Programme 2014-2020. For the RSS not included in the ISP, the data were selected from the national soil
database. 6748 point data were finally selected. SOC values obtained with the Springer and Klee and flash combustion
elemental analyser methods were retained for elaborations, because the 2 methods, were found to give statistically
equivalent results. SOC values obtained with Walkey and Black method were, instead, corrected with an empirical factor
of 1.3. 2292 of the 6748 point data had also measured bulk density (BD, Mg m–3). Pedotransfer functions were calibrated
to estimate BD were measured BD were missing, with the following as auxiliary variables: land use, soil regions, texture,
and SOC. The carbon stock (CS, ton ha–1) was calculated by multiplying: 0.3 (m) * SOC (dag kg-1) * fine earth fraction (1 -
skeletal content expressed as daL m–3) * BD (Mg m–3). CS of the first 30 cm depth was calculated as depth-weighted
average. A spatial statistics method was used for the CS interpolation. The following auxiliary variables were used: soil
regions, soil subregions, Corine land cover 2006, lithology, soils affected by natural constrains (gleyic, histic, vertic,
coarse, shallow, arenic, sodic, and acid), sand content, silt content, 30-m aster-DEM, distance from coast, distance from
relieves, soil aridity index, annual mean precipitations, mean annual air temperature, soil inorganic carbon, and soil
depth. For the soil region of Po valley, the land units at 1:250,000 scale were also used. The interpolation method was a
general linear regression for the soil regions of Po valley, and a radial basis function for the remaining Italian territory.
The 6748 point data were divided, by spatial random sampling, into 10 subsets. Ten interpolations were produced, each
time leaving out 1/10 of the dataset. Average (fig. 1), standard deviation and confidence intervals of these 10
interpolations were calculated. Mean Absolute Errors (MAE) and Root Mean Squared Errors (RMSE) were respectively
25.5 and 36.4 Mg/ha.

A.85 Italy Map source: Country submission Point data Number of samples: 6748 Sampling period: 1990-2013 SOC analysis method: SOC values obtained with the Springer and Klee and ’flash combustion elemental analyser’ methods were retained for elaborations. Uncorrected values obtained by the Walkey and Black method were corrected with an empirical linear equation, based on previous studies and as recommended by the Italian official methods. BD analysis method: Undisturbed sampling, core method and pit method Mapping method Mapping method details: Neural Networks and GLM, according to soil region Validation statistics: Mean Error (ME) of the prediction is 1.688 Mg/ha, MAE 25.57 Mg/ha, Root Mean Squared Error (RMSE) is 36.24 Mg/ha. Contact Data Holder: Research centre for agriculture and environment Contact: CREA Consiglio per la ricerca in agricoltura e l’analisi dell’economia agraria edoardo.costantini@crea.gov.it

Notes

c_stock: mean value c_stock_cv: coefficient of variation c_stock_sd: standard deviation c_stock_se: standard error c_stock_minus: lower bound of the confidence interval c_stock_plus: upper limit of the confidence interval

Files

c_stock.pdf

Files (189.6 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:1980f01afca73a777f5dd015e7d7325b
76.0 MB Preview Download
md5:cb5ec1323963618921d9242287511a29
1.4 MB Preview Download
md5:8560642c8b478b6ef38b58dfa8e0a753
104.4 MB Download
md5:d588d7955739ab1007b1cf5ab3bcfc76
7.7 MB Preview Download

Additional details

Related works

Is part of
Report: https://www.fao.org/3/I8891EN/i8891en.pdf (URL)
Is published in
Plot: http://54.229.242.119/GSOCmap/ (URL)