Published December 16, 2022 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Sex determination of medieval skeletal remains: evaluation of anthropological, odontological and genetic methods

Creators

  • 1. Laboratory for Forensic Genetics, University of Sarajevo-Institute for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • 2. Department of Archaeology, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Zagreb, Croatia
  • 3. Department of Dental Morphology, Dental Anthropology and Forensics, University of Sarajevo-Faculty of Dentistry with Clinics, Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • 4. Department of Archeology, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Description

During 2019, 28 grave constructions were excavated at cemetery Metaljica (Hadzici municipality, Bosnia and Herzegovina). Archaeological excavation has revealed 17 well preserved skeletons that were subjected to anthropological, odontological and genetic analyses. To determine sex by genetic analysis, amelogenin and DYS391 loci were taken into consideration. Concordance between results of anthropological, odontological and genetic analyses applied in this research occurred in one sample out of 17. In four samples, sex was determined only by genetic analysis, since sexual dimorphism indicators were not preserved. Concordance between odontological and genetic determinations was observed in two samples, while affirmative results of anthropological and genetic analysis were obtained in only one sample. Discrepancy in the majority of samples can be atributted to the state of preservation of skeletal remains, interpopulation differences and allele drop-out. Moreover, anthropological and odontological analyses were not applicable to juvenile/subadult skeletons, since sexually dimorphic characteristics relevant for metric and morphological analysis are not developed well at that developmental period. This study emphasizes the importance of combining anthropological, odontological and genetic methods in order to determine sex of archaeological skeletal remains accurately.

Files

Jusić et all.pdf

Files (1.2 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:0c71853b46d9501930e5404e94c75a3c
1.2 MB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • Banerjee, A., Kamath, V. V., Satelur, K., Rajkumar, K., & Sundaram, L. (2016). Sexual dimorphism in tooth morphometrics: An evaluation of the parameters. Journal of forensic dental sciences, 8(1), 22–27. doi:10.4103/0975-1475.176946.
  • Bauer, C.M., Niederstätter, H., McGlynn, G., Stadler, H., & Parson, W. (2013). Comparison of morphological and molecular genetic sex-typing on mediaeval human skeletal remains. Forensic science international:Genetics, 7(6), 581–586. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2013.05.005.
  • Buikstra, E.J., & Ubelaker, H.D. (1994). Standards for Data Collection from Human Skeletal Remains Proceedings of a Seminar at the Field Museum of Natural History, Arkansas Archaeological Survey Research Series No. 44, Fayetteville, Arkansas: Arkansas Archeological Survey.
  • Butler, J.M. (2015). Forensic DNA Typing: Interpretation. Massachusetts: Academic Press.
  • Chovalopoulou, M.E., Bertsatos, A., Zoi, I., Manolis, S.K. & Valakos, E. (2017). Reliability testing of metric methods for sex determination in ancient skeletal remains in Greece. Mediterranean Archaeology and Archaeometry, 18(1), 37-47. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.1069518.
  • Dzehverovic, M., Cakar, J., Bujak, E., Pilav, A., Ramic, J., Kalajdzic, A., & Pojskic, N. (2021). DNA analysis of skeletal remains of an important historical figure from the period of mediaeval Bosnia. International Journal of Osteoarchaeology, 31(5), 857-865. doi:10.1002/oa.3002
  • Eliášová, I., & Kubálek, P. (2009). Comparison of genetic and anthropological analyses in sex determination of skeletal remains from Knìževes (Czech Republic). Anthropologie (Brno), 47(1-2), 69-72.
  • Eliášová, I., Mazura, I., & Smejtek, L. (2010). DNA analysis of ancient skeletal remains. Folia biologica, 56(2), 47-50.
  • Gob, A., & Drouguet N. (2003). La muséologie: Histoire, développements, enjeux actuels. Paris: Armand Colin. Croatian edition: Gob, A., & Drouguet N. (2007). Muzeologija: Povijest, razvitak, izazovi današnjice (trans: Horn, J.). Zagreb: Izdanja Antibarbarus.
  • Gupta, B., & Gupta, M. (2016). Sex identification in forensic odontology-a review of various methodology. International Journal of Forensic Identification, 1(1), 9-13. doi: 10.4103/2542-5013.185693.
  • Harder, M., Renneberg, R., Meyer, P., Krause-Kyora, B., & von Wurmb-Schwark, N. (2012). STR-typing of ancient skeletal remains: which multiplex-PCR kit is the best? Croatian Medical Journal, 53(5), 416-422. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2012.53.416.
  • Higgins, D., & Austin, J.J. (2013). Teeth as a source of DNA for forensic identification of human remains: A Review. Science & Justice, 53(4), 433–441. doi: 10.1016/j.scijus.2013.06.001.
  • Horbaly, H.E., Kenyhercz, M.W., Hubbe, M., & Steadman, D.W. (2019). The Influence of Body Size on the Expression of Sexually Dimorphic Morphological Traits. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 64(1), 52-57. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.13850.
  • Inskip, S., Scheib, C. L., Wohns, A. W., Ge, X., Kivisild, T., & Robb, J. (2019). Evaluating macroscopic sex estimation methods using genetically sexed archaeological material: The medieval skeletal collection from St John's Divinity School, Cambridge. American journal of physical anthropology, 168(2), 340–351. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.23753.
  • Jakubowska, J., Maciejewska, A., & Pawłowski, R. (2012). Comparison of three methods of DNA extraction from human bones with different degrees of degradation. International journal of legal medicine, 126(1), 173–178. doi:10.1007/s00414-011-0590-5.
  • Joseph, A.P., Harish, R.K., Mohammed, P.K., & Vinod Kumar, R.B. (2013). How reliable is sex differentiation from teeth measurements. Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology Journal, 4(1), 289-292.
  • Kanchan, T., Chugh, V., Chugh, A., Setia, P., Shedge, R., & Krishan, K. (2021). Estimation of Sex from Dental Arch Dimensions: An Odontometric Analysis. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery, 32(8), 2713-2715. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000007787.
  • Kazzazi, S.M., & Kranioti, E.F. (2018). Sex estimation using cervical dental measurements in an archaeological population from Iran. Aarchaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 10, 439–448. doi: 10.1007/s12520-016-0363-7.
  • Konjhodzic Rascic, H. (1978). Prosjecne anatomske mjere zuba jugoslovenske populacije i postojanje seksualnih razlika u velicini zuba (dissertation). Sarajevo: University of Sarajevo.
  • Mai, L.L., Owl, M.Y., & Kersting, M.P. (2005). The Cambridge Dictionary of Human Biology and Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Manifold, B.M. (2012). Intrinsic and extrinsic factors involved in the preservation of non-adult skeletal remains in archaeology and forensic science. Bulletin of the International Association for Paleodontology, 6(2), 51-69.
  • Navitainuck, D.U., Vach, W., Alt, K.W., & Schibler, J. (2021). Best practice for osteological sexing in forensics and bioarchaeology: The utility of combining metric and morphological traits from different anatomical regions. International Journal of Osteoarchaeology. doi:10.1002/oa.3014.
  • Primorac, D., Schanfield, M.S., & Marjanovic, D. (2014). Basic Genetics and Human Genetic Variation. In D. Primorac & M.S. Schanfield (Eds.), Forensic DNA Application- an interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 3-53). Boca Raton, Florida, USA: CRC Press.
  • Quincey, D., Carle, G., Alunni, V., & Quatrehomme, G. (2013). Difficulties of sex determination from forensic bone degraded DNA: A comparison of three methods. Science and Justice, 53(3), 253-260. doi: 10.1016/j.scijus.2013.04.003.
  • Siriboonpiputtana, T., Rinthachai, T., Shotivaranon, J., Peonim, V., & Rerkamnuaychoke, B. (2018). Forensic genetic analysis of bone remains samples. Forensic science international, 284, 167–175. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.12.045.
  • Spradley, K.M. (2016). Metric Methods for the Biological Profile in Forensic Anthropology: Sex, Ancestry and, Stature. Academic Forensic Pathology, 6(3), 391-399. doi: 10.23907/2016.040.
  • Stewart, N.A., Gerlach, R.F., Gowland, R.L., Gron, K.J., & Montgomery, J. (2017). Sex determination using peptides from tooth enamel. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114 (52), 13649-13654. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1714926115.
  • Tekeli, E., Gültekin, T., Doksanalti, E.M., Öztaner, H.S., & Cüneyt, E. (2020). Accurate sex determination using ancient DNA analysis for human skeletal remains from different historical archeological sites in Turkey. Mediterranean Archaeology and Archaeometry, 20(1), 93-106. doi:10.5281/zenodo.3605672.
  • Vaňharová, M., & Drozdová, E. (2008). Sex determination of skeletal remains of 4000-year-old children and juveniles from Hoštice 1 za Hanou (Czech Republic) by ancient DNA analysis. Anthropological Review, 71(1), 63-70. doi:10.2478/v10044-008-0011-7.
  • Venkatesh, D., Sanchitha, V., Smitha, T., Sharma, G., Gaonkar, S., & Hema, K.N. (2019). Frequency and variability of five non metric dental crown traits in the permanent maxillary dentitions of a racially mixed population from Bengaluru, Karnataka. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, 23(3), 458-465. doi: 10.4103/jomfp.JOMFP_144_18.
  • Viciano, J., López-Lázaro, S., & Alemán, I. (2020). Sex estimation based on deciduous and permanent dentition in a contemporary spanish population. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 152 (1), 31-43. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.22324.
  • Vodanovic, M., Demo, Z., Njemirovski, V., Keros, J., & Brkic, H. (2007). Odontometrics: a useful method for sex determination in an archaeological skeletal population? Journal of Archaeological Science, 34(6), 905-913. doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2006.09.004.
  • White, D.T., & Folkens, A.P. (2005). The Human Bone Manual. Amsterdam: Elsevier, Academic Press.
  • Yepes, V.A., Luna, L.H., & Gómez, J. (2019). Sex estimation using coronal measurements of permanent canines in a contemporary mestizo population from Manizales, Colombia. Revista Facultad de Odontologìa Universidad de Antioquia, 30(2), 202-210. doi: 1017533/udea.rfo.V30n2a7.
  • Żądzińska, E., Frenzel D, & Malinowski, A. (1999). Odontological Analysis of Contemporary Germans from Hamburg. Zeitschrift Für Morphologie Und Anthropologie, 82(2-3), 225–40.
  • Zukic, S., & Bujak, E. (2020). Enamel extensions on deciduous teeth- an example on late medieval archaeological sample in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Bulletin of the International Association for Paleodontology, 14 (2), 130-135.