Published January 4, 2023 | Version v1
Taxonomic treatment Open

Tumidispora thailandica Tennakoon, S. Hongsanan & S. Lumyong 2023, sp. nov.

  • 1. Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand & Research Center of Microbial Diversity and Sustainable Utilization, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand
  • 2. Research Center of Microbial Diversity and Sustainable Utilization, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand & Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology, Faculty of Agriculture, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand & Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory for Plant Epigenetics, Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Microbial Genetic Engineering, College of Life Science and Oceanography, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, People's Republic of China
  • 3. Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand & Research Center of Microbial Diversity and Sustainable Utilization, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50200, Thailand & Academy of Science, The Royal Society of Thailand, Bangkok 10300, Thailand

Description

Tumidispora thailandica Tennakoon, S. Hongsanan & S. Lumyong sp. nov. (FIGURE 3)

Index Fungorum Number: IF559726; Facesoffungi number: FoF11796

Etymology:—The specific epithet “ thailandica ” refer to the country in which the fungus was first collected

Holotype:— MFLU 19-2771

Epiphytic on the upper surface of dead leaves of Dimocarpus longan Lour. (Sapindaceae), visible as small black dots. Superficial hyphae absent. Sexual morph: Thyriothecia 200–260 × 210–280 μm (x = 230 × 240 µm, n = 10), solitary, superficial, scattered, flattened, circular, brown to black, easily be removed from the substrate, poorly developed basal layer, with prominent, darker, central ostiole, darker around the ostiole, dark brown towards the outer lighter rim, irregularly rounded at the margin. Upper wall containing brown cells of textura angularis, radiating in slightly irregular, parallel lines from center to the outer rim. Hamathecium containing 2 μm wide, branched pseudoparaphyses. Asci 40–46 × 5–7 μm (x = 45 × 6 µm, n = 20), 8-spored, fissitunicate, bitunicate, short pedicellate, cylindrical to cylindric-clavate, apically rounded, with an ocular chamber. Ascospores 9–11 × 3–4 μm (x = 10.5 × 3.5 µm, n = 10), 1–2-seriate, hyaline, fusiform, rounded ends, 1-septate, constricted at the septum, apical cell swollen and wider, basal cell sub-conical, guttulate, two appendages in upper cell, smooth-walled. Asexual morph: Undetermined.

Culture characteristics:— Colonies on PDA, 18–22 mm diam. after 4 weeks at 25 °C, colonies from above: medium dense, circular, raised, surface smooth, entire margin, light green at margin, dark grey to brown at centre; reverse: light brown to light green at margin, dark grey to black at centre. Mycelium dark grey to black with tufting.

Material examined:— Thailand, Chiang Mai, dead leaves of Dimocarpus longan (Sapindaceae), 25 April 2018, D.S. Tennakoon, DHAY021A (MFLU 19-2771, holotype); ex-type living culture, SDBR-CMU438. ibid. 28 April 2018, DHAY021B (NCYU 19-0090, paratype); ex-paratype living culture, SDBR-CMU439.

GenBank numbers:—MFLU 19-2771: LSU: ON751750; ITS: ON751739; NCYU 19-0090: LSU: ON751751; ITS: ON751740.

Notes:—The morphological characteristics of our collection (MFLU 19-2771 and NCYU 19-0090) tally well with the generic concept of Tumidispora, by having flattened, circular, brown to black thyriothecia, cylindrical to cylindricclavate, short pedicellate asci and 1-septate, hyaline ascospores with a swollen apical cell (Ariyawansa et al. 2015). But our collection can be distinguished from the type (T. shoreae) in having shorter asci (40–46 × 5–7 μm vs 53–55 × 7–8 μm) and ascospores (9–11 × 3–4 μm vs 14–15 × 4–5 μm). In addition, our collection ascospores are distinctly fusiform with rounded ends and consist of two appendages in the upper cell, whereas T. shoreae has narrowly fusiform ascospores with sub-papillate ends and lacking appendages (Ariyawansa et al. 2015). Phylogeny results show that our collection (MFLU 19-2771 and NCYU 19-0090) forms an independent lineage sister to T. shoreae isolates (MFLUCC 12-0409 and MFLUCC 14-0574) with strong statistical support (100% ML, 100% MP, 1.00 BYPP, FIGURE 1). Thus, we introduce our collection (MFLU 19-2771 and NCYU 19-0090) as a new species, T. thailandica from the dead leaves of Dimocarpus longan in Thailand.

Notes

Published as part of Tennakoon, Danushka S., Hongsanan, Sinang, De Silva, Nimali I., Suwannarach, Nakarin & Lumyong, Saisamorn, 2023, Molecular phylogeny and morphological characterization of Paramicrothyrium bambusae sp. nov. and Tumidispora thailandica sp. nov. from leaf litter, pp. 112-124 in Phytotaxa 578 (1) on pages 118-119, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.578.1.6, http://zenodo.org/record/7517738

Files

Files (4.2 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:6cf5ff80af11a615809389610a7a415d
4.2 kB Download

System files (25.1 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:6ce2cfcd1eb859fb188387450b47e00e
25.1 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

Biodiversity

Collection code
MFLU
Material sample ID
MFLU 19-2771
Scientific name authorship
Tennakoon, S. Hongsanan & S. Lumyong
Kingdom
Fungi
Phylum
Ascomycota
Order
Microthyriales
Family
Microthyriaceae
Genus
Tumidispora
Species
thailandica
Taxon rank
species
Taxonomic status
sp. nov.
Type status
holotype
Taxonomic concept label
Tumidispora thailandica Tennakoon, Hongsanan & Lumyong, 2023

References

  • Ariyawansa, H. A., Hyde, K. D., Jayasiri, S. C., Buyck, B., Kandawatte, W. T. C., Cui, Y. Y., Dai, D. Q., Dai, Y. C., Daranagama, D. A., Jayawardena, R. S., Lucking, R., Ghobad-Nejhad, M., Niskanen, T., Thambugala, K. M., Voigt, K., Zhao, R. L., Boonmee, S., Bahkali, A. H., Chen, J., Cui, B. K., Dayarathne, M. C., Dissanayake, A. J., Ekanayaka, A. H., Hashimoto, A., Hongsanan, S., Jones, E. B. G., Larsson, E., Lewis, D., Li, W. J., Li, Q. R., Liu, J. K., Luo, Z. L., Maharachchikumbura, S. S. N., Mapook, A., McKenzie, E. H. C., Norphanphoun, C., Pang, K. L., Perera, R. H., Phookamsak, R., Phukhamsakda, C., Randrianjohany, E., Senanayake, I. C., Singtripop, C., Shang, Q., Tanaka K, Tian Q, Tian, C. M., Tibpromma, S., Verbeken, A., Abdel-Wahab, M. A., Wanasinghe, D. N., Wijayawardene, N. N., Zhang, J. F., Zhang, H., Abdel-Aziz, F. A., Adamck, S., Ammirati, J. F., Bulgakov, T., Cabral, A. L., Callaghan, T. M., Callac, P., Chang, C. H., Coca, L. F., Dal-Forno, M., Dollhofer, V., Fliegerova, K., Greiner, K., Griffith, G. W., Ho, H. M., Hofstetter, V., Jeewon, R., Kang, J. C., Kirk, P. M., Kytovuori, I., Lawrey, J. D., Li, J. X. H., Liu, Z. Y., Zhong, X. L., Liimatainen, K., Lumbsch, H. T., Matumura, M., Moncada, B., Nuankaew, S., Parnmen, S., Santiago, M. D. A., Sato, G., Sommai, S., Song, Y., De Souza, C. A. F., De Souza-Motta, C. M., Su, H. Y., Suetrong, S., Wang, Y., Wei, S. F., Wen, T. C., Shen, H., Yuan, H. S., Zhou, L. W., Reblova, M., Fournier, J. & Camporesi, E. (2015) Fungal Diversity Notes 111 - 252 Taxonomic and phylogenetic contributions to fungal taxa. Fungal Diversity 75: 27 - 274. https: // doi. org / 10.1007 / s 13225 - 015 - 0346 - 5