Published September 21, 2022 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Psychoanalysis, Science or Pseudoscience?

Creators

  • 1. BBVAOpenMind, RBA/National Geographic

Description

As much as the couch is a piece of furniture associated with television, the “divan” or Turkish couch is a piece of furniture associated with psychoanalysis. Starting at the end of the 19th century, the Austrian Sigmund Freud abandoned neurological research to develop his psychotherapy, the method that acquired such notoriety that it became an ingredient of Western popular culture, elevating its originator to the position of the most famous psychiatrist —something he never was— of all time. But his status is wrapped up in a perennial polemic: Is there any scientific evidence to support psychoanalysis? Or is it merely a pseudoscience, perhaps among the most academic of them all?

Files

Psychoanalysis, Science or Pseudoscience.pdf

Files (561.3 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:2614130141d0e8b9621b3db1a2fb482b
561.3 kB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • Eysenck, H. J. (1985).Decline and Fall of the FreudianEmpire.Harmondsworth,UK: Penguin.Eysenck, H. J., & Wilson, G. D. (1973).TheExperimentalStudy of FreudianTheories.London: Methuen.Hall, C. S. (1954).A Primer of Freudian Psychology.Cleveland: World PublishingCo.Hines, T. (1988).Pseudoscience and the Paranormal.Buffalo, NY: PrometheusBooks.Kline, P. (1968). Obsessional Traits, Obsessional Symptoms and Anal Erotism.British Journal of MedicalPsychology,41, 299–305.Medawar, P. B. (1984).The Limits of Science.Oxford:Oxford University Press.Radner, D., & Radner, M. (1982).Science andUnreason.Belmont, CA:Wadsworth.Spence, D. P. (1987).The Freudian Metaphor.New York:Norton.Sulloway, F.J. (1979).Freud, Biologist of the Mind:Beyond the PsychoanalyticLegend.London: Burnett Books/André Deutsch.Webster, R. (1995).Why Freud was Wrong: Sin, Scienceand Psychoanalysis.London: HarperCollins.