Published December 26, 2022 | Version v1
Journal article Open

INFLUENCE OF THE MATERIAL FROM WHICH THE GUM SHAPER IS MADE ON THE AMOUNT OF BACTERIAL COLONIZATION IN THE AREA OF FORMATION OF THE GUM CONTOUR OF THE INSTALLED IMPLANTS

Authors/Creators

  • 1. Doctor of Philosophy in Medicine Head of the Department of Dentistry Faculty of Medicine, Nakhchivan State University Nakhichvan. Azerbaijan
  • 2. Doctor of Philosophy in Medicine, teacher of the Department of Dentistry Faculty of Medicine, Nakhchivan State University Nakhichvan. Azerbaijan

Description

Abstract

One of the modern methods of orthopedic treatment of partial and complete absence of teeth is dental prosthetics using dental implants. Dental implants have become an integral part of modern dentistry and have significantly expanded the range of possibilities for restoring the dentition. Removable orthopedic structures, in comparison with non-removable ones based on dental implants, have a number of disadvantages due to the nature and type of fixation, the volume of plastic in the oral cavity, the time of adaptation to prostheses, as well as a low indicator of the aesthetic component and chewing efficiency. When forming the gums, the material from which the shapers are made is important. The main requirements for materials are strength, biocompatibility, non-toxicity and hypoallergenicity.

Notes

References: 1. Schwitalla AD, Zimmermann T, Spintig T, Kallage I, Müller W-D. Fatigue limits of different PEEK materials for dental implants. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2017;69:163-168. 2. Iordanishvili A., Abramov D. Stomatologicheskie konstruktsionnye materialy: patofiziologicheskoe obosnovanie k optimal'nomu ispol'zovaniyu pri dental'noi implantatsii i protezirovanii. SPb: Litres; 2017 3. Dubova, L.V. Vybor materiala dlya vremennyh nes"emnyh ortopedicheskih konstrukcij dlitel'nogo pol'zovaniya s oporoj na dental'nye implantaty po dannym urovnya mikrobnoj adgezii / L.V.Dubova, M.V.Malik, YU.S.Zolkina // Aktual'nye voprosy sovremennoj stomatologii. - 2018. - S. 86-91. 4. Zagorskii V.A. Dental'naya implantatsiya. Materialy i komponenty. Simvol nauki. 2016;9. 5. Mirgazizov, M.Z. Osobennosti izgotovleniya individual'nyh formirovatelej desny vokrug dental'nyh implantatov na osnove primeneniya lit'evogo splava "Titanid" / M.Z.Mirgazizov, R.G.Hafi zov, F.A.Hafi zova // Materialy s pamyat'yu formy i novye medicinskie tekhnologii. - Tomsk: NPC MIC, 2010. - S. 26-28. 6. Pivovarov A.A., Arutyunov S.D., Muslov S.A., Raimova D.B., Kozlov S.S. Prochnostnye svoistva frezerovannykh zubochelyustnykh protezov iz konstruktsionnogo stomatologicheskogo materiala. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya. 2014;4:326. 7. Sheremet'ev S.V., Sergeeva E.A., Bakirova I.N., Zenitova L.A. Ispol'zovanie poliefirefirketona v meditsine i drugikh otraslyakh promyshlennosti. Obzor. Vestnik Kazanskogo tekhnologicheskogo universiteta. 2012;15(20):164-167. 8. Najeeb S, Zafar MS, Khurshid Z, Siddiqui F. Applications of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) in oral implantology and prosthodontics. J Prosthodont Res. 2016;60(1):12-19. 9. Dantas, L. Bacterial Adhesion and Surface Roughness for Diff erent Clinical Techniques for Acrylic Polymethyl Methacrylate / L.Dantas, J.Silva-Neto // Int. J. of Dentistry. - 2016. - ID. 8685796. 10. Heimer, S. Discoloration of PMMA, composite, and PEEK / S.Heimer, P.Schmidlin, B.Stawarczyk // Clin. Oral Investigations. - 2017. - № 4. - P. 1191-1200.

Files

NJD_99-18-19.pdf

Files (262.9 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:a06d5966e99ddb41769669f4a0210bd8
262.9 kB Preview Download