Comparative Research Method of Contemporary Dramatic Arts
Description
The purpose of the article is to analyse the comparative method specifics in contemporary art history in the context of dramatic arts research in the late 20th and early 21st centuries. The research methodology of system-oriented approach involves the following methods: historical method is to study the development of the comparative method; the analytical, structural and logical method is to comprehend and cover the chronology of the historical aspect of the problem, mastering the comparative method specifics; the method of theoretical generalisation is to summarise. Scientific novelty. For the first time, the place and significance of the comparative analysis method in the process of art history research are substantiated, and the main concepts of the principles of interpretation of contemporary dramatic arts in research methods in other branches of humanitarian knowledge are analysed. Conclusions. The integration processes of the world art space of the late 20th and early 21st centuries contributed to the rapid dynamics and expansion of the boundaries of dramatic arts, the introduction of innovative methods and forms, the development of unique artistic complexes of research. Due to the actualisation of the interdisciplinary context in the scientific dimension, the comparative method has recently been actively used in art history research as one of the most interdisciplinary and practical terms of 21st-century scientific issues. The article clearly outlines the features of epistemological, logical, methodological, methodological, ideological, axeological and practical functions of the comparative method of dramatic arts research of the late 20th and early 21st centuries. Furthermore, we have specified the place and functions of comparative studies in the context of the peculiarities of contemporary dramatic arts: to compare trends in the development of national dramatic arts, to study their direct and indirect interrelation, typological, inter-art and interdisciplinary connections; to identify similar and different techniques, methods, principles, approaches, etc.; to provide an opportunity to trace the development of scenic processes.
Files
Comparative_Research_Method_of_Contemporary_Dramatic_Arts.pdf
Files
(284.2 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:02c2d16fce9394961b90719ff155182e
|
284.2 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
References
- Agafonova, N. (2007). Komparativnoe Iskusstvovedenie: Metodologicheskie Strategii i Kinematograficheskii Rakurs [Comparative Art Criticism: Methodological Strategies and a Cinematic Perspective]. Viesnik Bielaruskaha Dziaržaŭnaha Univiersiteta Kuĺtury i Mastactvaŭ [Bulletin of the Belarusian State University of Culture and Arts], 8, 40-46 [in Russian].
- Antonyan, M. (2015). Osobennosti Retseptsii Performansa: na Materiale Rabot Mariny Abramovich [Features of the Performance Reception: Based on the Works of Marina Abramovich] [PhD Dissertation]. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow [in Russian].
- Karpov, A. (2015). Mezhdistsiplinarnye Podkhody k Sovremennoi Teorii i Istorii Iskusstva: Problemy Podgotovki Magistrov- Iskusstvovedov [Interdisciplinary Approaches in Contemporary Theory and Art History: Issues in Teaching and Learning Master of Art History]. V Mire Nauki i Iskusstva: Voprosy Filologii, Iskusstvovedeniya i Kul'turologii [In the World of Science and Art: Questions of Philology, Art History and Cultural Studies], 5(48), 89-97 [in Russian].
- Khan, N. (2016). Osobennosti Komparativnoi Metodologii v Issledovanii Religiozno-Politicheskikh Fenomenov [Features of a Comparative Methodology in the Study of Religious and Political Phenomena]. Simvol Nauki [Symbol of Science], 3(4), 115-118 [in Russian].
- Klekovkin, O. (2017). Mystetstvo: Metodolohiia Doslidzhennia [Art: Research Methodology]. Feniks [in Ukrainian].
- Kokorin, A. (2009). Sravnitel'nyi Analiz : Teoriya, Metodologiya, Metodika [Comparative Analysis: Theory, Methodology, Methods]. MGOU Publishing [in Russian].
- Panofsky, E. (1998). Renessans i "Renessansy" v Iskusstve Zapada [Renaissance and "Renaissances" in the Art of the West] (A. G. Gabrichevskii, Trans.). Iskusstvo [in Russian].
- Parfait, F. (2006). Collection New Media Installations. In Ch. Van Assche (Ed.), Centre Pompidou (pp. 110-113). Adagp.
- Petrova, O. (2004). Mystetstvoznavchi Refleksii. Istoriia, Teoriia ta Krytyka Obrazotvorchoho Mystetstva 70-kh rokiv XX st. – Pochatku XXI st. [Art Reflections: History, Theory and Critique of the Fine Arts of the 1970s – Beginning of the 21st Century]. Kyiv-Mohyla Academy [in Ukrainian].
- Prokoptsova, V. (2004). Komparativnoe Iskusstvovedenie kak Otrazhenie Protsessa Integratsii Iskusstv [Comparative Art Criticism as a Reflection of the Process of Arts Integration]. In Aktual'nye Problemy Mirovoi Khudozhestvennoi Kul'tury [Actual Problems of World Artistic Culture], Proceedings of the International Conference, Grodno (Pt. 2, pp. 18-22). Yanka Kupala State University of Grodno [in Russian].
- Prokoptsova, V. (2011). Komparativnoe Iskusstvovedenie kak Novaya Spetsializatsiya v Sovremennom Khudozhestvennom Obrazovanii [Comparative Art Studies as a New Specialization in Contemporary Art Education]. In M. A. Mozheiko (Ed.), Kul'tura: Otkrytyi Format – 2011: (Bibliotekovedenie, Bibliografovedenie i Knigovedenie, Iskusstvovedenie, Kul'turologiya, Sotsiokul'turnaya Deyatel'nost') [Culture: Open Format – 2011: (Library Science, Bibliography and Bibliology, Art Criticism, Cultural Studies, Socio-Cultural Activities) (pp. 165-169). Belarusian State University of Culture and Arts [in Russian].
- Prokoptsova, V. (2013). Metodologicheskie Osnovy Komparativnogo Iskusstvovedeniya [Methodological Foundations of Comparative Art Criticism]. In Tradycyjnaja i Sučasnaja Kuĺtura Bielarusi: Historyja, Aktuaĺny Stan, Pierspiektyvy [Traditional and Modern Culture of Belarus: History, Current State, Prospects], Proceedings of the Scientific Conference, Mіnsk, (pp. 219-226). Belarusian State University of Culture and Arts [in Russian].
- Prokoptsova, V. (2015). Komparativnoe Prostranstvo Sovremennogo Iskusstvovedeniya [Comparative Space of Contemporary Art Criticism]. Viesnik Bielaruskaha Dziaržaŭnaha Univiersiteta Kuĺtury i Mastactvaŭ [Bulletin of the Belarusian State University of Culture and Arts], 2(24), 121-127 [in Russian].
- Shmahalo, R. (2007). Shliakh Lvivskoi Shkoly Mystetstvoznavstva u XXI stolittia [Path of the Lviv School of Art Studies in the 21st Century]. Visnyk Lvivskoi Natsionalnoi Akademii Mystetstv [Bulletin of Lviv National Academy of Arts], 4, 5-24 [in Ukrainian].
- Shumylovych, B. (2006). Vizualna Ironiia ta Ukrsuch Mystetstvo [Visual Irony and Ukrsuch Art]. In O. Haleta, Ye. Hulevych, & Z. Rybchynska (Comps.), Ironiia [Irony] (pp. 78-92). Litopys, Smoloskyp [in Ukrainian].
- Skrynnyk-Myska, D. (2012). Metodolohichnyi Dyskurs u Mystetstvoznavstvi: Kulturolohichnyi Aspekt [Methodological Discourse in Art Criticism: the Cultural Aspect]. Narodoznavchi Zoshyty [Ethnographic Notebooks], 1(103), 90-97 [in Ukrainian].
- Yatsiv, R. (2009). Metodolohichnyi Instrumentarii Suchasnoho Mystetstvoznavstva: vid Opysovosti do Rozkryttia Smysliv [A Methodological Toolkit of Contemporary Art Criticism: from Descriptiveness to the Disclosure of Meanings]. A…Z Art, 1, 8-9 [in Ukrainian].