There is a newer version of the record available.

Published November 4, 2022 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Facultative male investment in prolonged mate-guarding in a butterfly

  • 1. Doctoral School of Veterinary Science, University of Veterinary Medicine Budapest, István utca 2. 1078-Budapest, Hungary
  • 2. Department of Zoology, Plant Protection Institute, Centre for Agricultural Research, ELKH (Eötvös Lóránd Research Network), Herman Ottó út 15. 1022-Budapest, Hungary
  • 3. Doctoral School of Biological Sciences, Hungarian University of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Páter Károly utca 1. 2100-Gödöllő, Hungary
  • 4. Lendület Ecosystem Services Research Group, Institute of Ecology and Botany, Centre for Ecological Research, ELKH (Eötvös Lóránd Research Network), Alkotmány út 2-4. 2163-Vácrátót, Hungary
  • 5. Department of Biostatistics, University of Veterinary Medicine Budapest, István utca 2. 1078-Budapest, Hungary
  • 6. Department of Ecology, University of Veterinary Medicine Budapest, István utca 2. 1078-Budapest, Hungary

Description

Sexual conflict over mating may induce male mate-guarding prolonged in time in the absence of males, via devices such as mating plugs, widespread in insects. In most Lepidoptera, internal plugs are common, while in some butterfly families large external devices, called sphragides, evolved independently. Lack of, or incomplete sphragis in a few individuals were reported in sphragis-bearing species. Previous studies focused on typifying species-specific devices in a few specimens of many species. In contrast, we investigated alternative mate-guarding devices in detail of a sphragis-bearing butterfly. We conducted a six-year observational field study in a Clouded Apollo Parnassius mnemosyne population. Inspecting 492 females, we identified 3 different devices, filament, stopple and shield (i.e. sphragis) increasing in size and structure complexity, implying differential male investment and effectiveness in securing paternity. Shield dimensions, colour and all devices’ shapes varied considerably. Shields were far more frequent than other devices. Some devices were lost, and a few were video-recorded when removed by males, showing the role of different parts of male external genitalia. We discuss potential causes of device variation and the role of removal attempts, and assess potential costs and benefits for both sexes.

Files

MS_data_AdamGor.csv

Files (569.5 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:509f8c66f1bea83e3e58fa9d0d19a4d6
2.5 kB Download
md5:87e3c235c6a9cb4f800cf93441606308
65.4 kB Preview Download
md5:7b5e68b111906ab5e9feb65413dcfe99
152.8 MB Preview Download
md5:ff1f9b7f9d0571ec54d70dbdae4b5173
182.7 MB Preview Download
md5:26d8d1406017077e86a123794b55b630
172.2 MB Preview Download
md5:8da5ebdf548a43d027febf2d02ec14ff
61.7 MB Preview Download
md5:c9418f6480777728e58413b5eb71903c
924 Bytes Preview Download