Published June 30, 2021 | Version KaJEP
Journal article Open

Gender Disparity in Learning Approaches and Academic Performance among Colleges of Education Students in Katsina State, Nigeria

Creators

  • 1. Department of Educational Foundations, Federal University Gusau

Description

This study investigated gender disparity in learning approaches and academic performance among Colleges of Education students in Katina state.  Ex-post facto design was used.  The study used 333 students as samples drawn from three tertiary institutions.  The Revised Two-Factor Study Process Questionnaire (R-SPQ-2F) was adopted to measure learning approaches, while academic performance was measured by students’ cumulative grade point average (CGPA). Cronbach Alpha, Spearman-Brown Coefficient and Guttman Split-Half Coefficient values of Revised Two-Factor Study Process Questionnaire (R-SPQ-2F) were .51, .68 and.68 respectively. The statistic used to analyze the data was t-test for independent sample.  Two hypotheses were formulated and tested.  The study did not find any significant difference in the academic performance of male deep learners and female deep learners approach.  So also the study did not find any significant difference in the academic performance of male surface learners and female surface learners. It was recommended that teachers and college management should give proper orientation to new students about deep and surface learning approaches to studies as well as use of essay and objective test items as assessment tools throughout their programme.

Files

19 Gender Disparity in Learning Approaches and Academic.pdf

Files (587.5 kB)

Additional details

References

  • Aharony, N. (2006). The use of deep and surface learning strategies among students learning English as a foreign language in an internet environment. British journal of educational psychology, 76, 851-866.
  • Biggs, J. (1987a). Student approaches to learning and studying. Australian Council for Educational Research.
  • Biggs, J., Kember, D. & Leung, D. Y. P. (2001). The revised two-factor study process questionnaire. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 133-149. Retrieved on 18th November, 2010, from www.johnbiggs.com.au/pdf/ex.2factor.spq.pdf.
  • Cano, F. (2007). Approaches to learning and study orchestration in high school students. European Journal of Psychology Education, 22 (2), 131-151.Retrieved on 1st February, 2012, from link.springer.com/article/1010007962FB03173518.
  • Chan, K. (2003). (2008). Hong Kong teacher education students' epistemological beliefs and approaches to learning. Research in Education, 69, 36-50. Retrieved on 15th July, 2011, from http://repository.ied.edu.hk/dspace/handle/2260.2/5451
  • Donald, J. & Jackling, B. (2007). Students' characteristics: A cross-cultural study. Proceedings of the Second Innovation in Accounting and Corporate Governance Education Conference. 30 January-February. Hobart Tasmania. Retrieved on 14th January, 2011, from http://www.ultas.edu.au/business/facility