Improving models for sustainability evaluation of construction projects in the initiation and planning processes
Description
The object of this study is the management processes of «sustainable construction». Sustainability is considered through the application of management processes that, in addition to the traditional tasks for construction projects, also outline the tasks of a wider context. Strategies and production practices of «sustainable construction» involve taking into account environmental, social and economic factors that affect a wide range of stakeholders and the overall condition of the built space. In this regard, the issue of applying management processes in the construction industry that ensure proper organizational and technological sustainability of projects is also being updated. This article aims to fill the existing information and methodological gap in the processes of assessing the sustainability of construction project management processes.
A correlation method was applied to determine the interdependencies of the characteristics of the use of tools and methods in the processes of managing construction projects with the values of sustainable development 5Р (Product, Proses, People, Planet, and Prosperity). Highlighting the characteristics of permanence in project management processes helps to explain the difference in approaches for ensuring the internal sustainability of the construction object and the sustainable management of a construction project.
A comprehensive methodology for quantitative assessment of sustainable construction project management in the initiation and planning processes under conditions of uncertainty is proposed. The relative importance of construction project management processes and subcategories of sustainable development of the construction site is taken into account. Basic mathematical models of sustainability assessment have been developed: balanced in all areas of knowledge of construction project management for each process, balanced across all construction project management processes at the «Initiation» and «Planning» phases for each category of sustainable development, and integral assessment of sustainability of construction project management processes.
Files
Improving models for sustainability evaluation of construction projects in the initiation and planning processes.pdf
Files
(876.0 kB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:b53484d8853ee4c8381873c91f26d7db
|
876.0 kB | Preview Download |
Additional details
References
- Claro, P. B. de O., Esteves, N. R. (2021). Sustainability-oriented strategy and Sustainable Development Goals. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 39 (4), 613–630. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/mip-08-2020-0365
- Rajabi, S., El-Sayegh, S., Romdhane, L. (2022). Identification and assessment of sustainability performance indicators for construction projects. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 15, 100193. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2022.100193
- BREEAM International New Construction. Version 6.0 (2021). BRE Global Ltd. Available at: https://files.bregroup.com/breeam/technicalmanuals/sd/international-new-construction-version-6/
- LEED v4.1 building design and construction: Getting started guide for beta participants (2022). Washington: U.S. Green Building Council, 300.
- Living building challenge 4.0: a visionary path to a regenerative future (2019). Seattle: Living Future Institute, 84.
- Gontar, B., Gontar, Z., Sikora-Fernandez, D. (2018). Strategiczne zarządzanie projektami transformacji inteligentnych miast. Łódzkiego. doi: https://doi.org/10.18778/8142-621-3
- The GPM P5TM Standard for Sustainability in Project Management (2019). GPM Global. Version 2.0. Available at: https://mosaicprojects.com.au/PDF-Gen/The-GPM-P5-Standard-for-Sustainability-in-Project-Management-v2.0.pdf
- Fesenko, T., Minaev, D. (2014). Costomer focus in the project communications management (on the example of house building). Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 5 (3 (71)), 4–10. doi: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2014.28032
- Kerzner, H. (2022). Project management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling. Wiley, 880. Available at: https://www.wiley.com/en-us/Project+Management%3A+A+Systems+Approach+to+Planning%2C+Scheduling%2C+and+Controlling%2C+13th+Edition-p-9781119805373
- A Guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK® Guide): Sixth Edition (2017). Project Management Institute, 756.
- Kivilä, J., Martinsuo, M., Vuorinen, L. (2017). Sustainable project management through project control in infrastructure projects. International Journal of Project Management, 35 (6), 1167–1183. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2017.02.009
- Fesenko, T., Shakhov, A., Fesenko, G., Bibik, N., Tupchenko, V. (2018). Modeling of customeroriented construction project management using the gender logic systems. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 1 (3 (91)), 50–59. doi: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2018.123124
- Fesenko, T., Fesenko, G. (2017). Developing gender maturity models of project and program management system. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 1 (3 (85)), 46–55. doi: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2017.28031
- Fesenko, T., Shakhov, A., Fesenko, G. (2017). Modeling of maturity of gender-oriented project management office. Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 5 (3 (89)), 30–38. doi: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2017.110286
- Siew, R. Y. J. (2015). Integrating sustainability into construction project portfolio management. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 20 (1), 101–108. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-015-0520-z
- A Guide to the project management body of knowledge Construction (PMBOK® Guide) (2016). Project Management Institute, 489.
- Silvius, A. J. G., Schipper, R. P. J. (2014). Sustainability in project management: A literature review and impact analysis. Social Business, 4 (1), 63–96. doi: https://doi.org/10.1362/204440814x13948909253866
- Papke-Shields, K. E., Boyer-Wright, K. M. (2017). Strategic planning characteristics applied to project management. International Journal of Project Management, 35 (2), 169–179. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.10.015
- Yu, W., Cheng, S., Ho, W., Chang, Y. (2018). Measuring the Sustainability of Construction Projects throughout Their Lifecycle: A Taiwan Lesson. Sustainability, 10 (5), 1523. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051523
- Stanitsas, M., Kirytopoulos, K., Leopoulos, V. (2021). Integrating sustainability indicators into project management: The case of construction industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 279, 123774. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123774
- Dabirian, S., Khanzadi, M., Taheriattar, R. (2017). Qualitative Modeling of Sustainability Performance in Construction Projects Considering Productivity Approach. International Journal of Civil Engineering, 15 (8), 1143–1158. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-017-0241-4
- Al-Tekreeti, M. S., Beheiry, S. M., Ahmed, V. (2022). Commitment Indicators for Tracking Sustainable Design Decisions in Construction Projects. Sustainability, 14 (10), 6205. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14106205
- Yu, M., Zhu, F., Yang, X., Wang, L., Sun, X. (2018). Integrating Sustainability into Construction Engineering Projects: Perspective of Sustainable Project Planning. Sustainability, 10 (3), 784. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030784
- Fesenko, T., Fesenko, G., Bibik, N. (2017). The safe city: developing of GIS tools for gender-oriented monitoring (on the example of Kharkiv city, Ukraine). Eastern-European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, 3 (2 (87)), 25–33. doi: https://doi.org/10.15587/1729-4061.2017.103054
- Campbell, S. L., Chancelier, J.-P., Nikoukhah, R. (2010). Modeling and Simulation in Scilab. Modeling and Simulation in Scilab/Scicos with ScicosLab 4.4, 73–106. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5527-2_3