Published July 26, 2013 | Version v1
Taxonomic treatment Open

Tegenaria parietina

Description

TEGENARIA PARIETINA (FOURCROY, 1785)

(FIGS 1E, F, 21N–R)

Aranea parietina Fourcroy, 1785: 533.

Aranea phalangiodes Fourcroy, 1785: 535.

Tegenaria domestica: Walckenaer, 1805: 49, pl. 6, figs 53, 54 (misidentified); Audouin, 1826: 312, pl. 1, fig. 2 (female, misidentification); Blackwall, 1861: 163–165, pl. 11, fig. 105 (misidentification).

Tegenaria murina Walckenaer, 1805: 50; Walckenaer, 1842: 6, male.

Tegenaria saxatilis C. L. Koch, 1834: 125, pl. 20, male.

Trichopus libratus ‘C. M.’, 1834: 10; synonymized by Murphy & Merrett (2000: 7).

Tegenaria guyonii Guérin-Méneville, 1829 –1844: pl. 2, fig. 1; Walckenaer, 1842: 5, male; Lucas, 1846: 241, 242.

Tegenaria intricata C. L. Koch, 1841: 29, 30, figs 610, 611.

Tegenaria parietina: Simon, 1875: 59–61, pl. 5, fig. 4.

No type material available.

Other material examined

Albania (1 ♂); Belgium (8 ♂); Bulgaria (3 ♂); Croatia (3 ♂, 4 ♀); France (3 ♂, 3 ♀); Germany (3 ♂); United Kingdom (1 ♂); Greece (11 ♂, 22 ♀); Italy (22 ♂, 55 ♀); Malta (1 ♀); Portugal (1 ♀); Spain (8 ♂, 10 ♀); Switzerland (2 ♂, 2 ♀). Africa: Algeria (1 ♀, 2 ♀); Egypt (1 ♂, 2); South Africa (1 ♂); Tunisia (1 ♂). Asia: Israel (4 ♂, 2 ♀); Lebanon (5 ♀); Syria (1 ♂); Turkey (3 ♂, 2 ♀). Central America: West Indies (1 ♂). South America: Paraguay (1 ♂)

.

Diagnosis

See the Diagnosis section for Teg. ferruginea. See also Oxford & Merrett (2000).

Description

Information about the high levels of variation was provided by Oxford & Merrett (2000). Good drawings of male and female were also provided by Locket & Millidge (1953), Roberts (1985), and Levy (1996). Some additional information is provided here.

Measurements: Female (N = 1): CL 5.32, CW 3.92, STL 2.44, STW 2.29, OL 5.92, OW 4.01. Leg I (7.30, 2.11, 6.90, 7.58, 3.06), II (6.59, 1.93, 6.07, 6.75, 2.76), III (5.62, 1.59, 4.61, 5.70, 2.17), IV (7.09, 1.99, 6.28, 8.45, 2.61). Pedipalp (2.28, 0.89, 1.39, 2.22). EPL 0.56, EPW 1.29, ATL 0.30, ATW 0.73. Eyes: PME 0.20, PLE 0.22, AME 0.18, ALE 0.23. Eye distances: PME–PME 1 x PME, PME–AME 1 x PME, PME–PLE 1 x PME, PME–ALE 1 x PME, AME–AME 0.5–1 x AME, AME– ALE <0.5 x AME. CLY1 2.5–3 x AME, CLY2 1.5 x ALE.

Male palp: RTA with three branches, ventral branch broad, lobe-like, distally moderately protruding, distinct ridge, lateral branch broad and flat, protruding, distally obliquely truncated, dorsal branch strongly sclerotized, protruding, as long as wide, distally obtusely and obliquely pointed, anteriorly with a stepped, small point. Filiform embolus length about 2.5 x CB, originating at 8 o’clock position, distal tip at 3 o’clock position. Conductor with distal portion strongly elongated and moderately curved, lateral margin completely folded. Terminal end bifid, ventral part short, simple rounded plate, dorsal part platelike, shorter than ventral part. Connection of conductor to tegulum moderately sclerotized. MA originating at 6 o’clock position, strongly protruding, distally with hook-like sclerite. MA membranously connected to tegulum. Basal part of tegulum clearly visible, with undulated margin.

Epigyne and vulva: Epigyne medially with small, pale, membranous area. Posterior sclerite expressed as extensively sclerotized bar with anterior margin concave (semicircled). CO laterally of the membranous median area between this area and the posterior sclerite. Epigynal ‘pseudo teeth’ absent. Vulva consists of CBD, no distinct RC recognizable. Only very first part (CD) of CBD moderately sclerotized, the rest strongly sclerotized and convoluted, with a smaller anterior (not really a spiral) and a larger posterior spiral region. Ducts are separated by more than three duct diameters. FD only represented by small, leafshaped appendages.

Other important characters: Cheliceral promargin and retromargin both with four teeth. Colulus developed as trapezoidal plate with the distal margin medially notched. Same pattern of distal spigots on PMS (in females) as described for the type species. PLS with distal segment as long as basal segment. Tarsal trichobothria on cymbium and palp tarsus present. Tarsal trichobothria eight to ten. Small teeth on paired claws of leg I 13–14. Leg spination: leg femora (1–3–2–0 or 1–3–3–0, 1–3–2–0, 1–3–2–0, 1–1– 2–0), patellae (all 2–0–0), tibiae (0, 0–1–0–1 or 0–2– 0–1, 2–2–1–2, 2–1–1–2 or 2–2–2–2), tarsi (I–IV 0, sometimes IV 0–0–1–0).

Coloration: Margin of carapace with three crescentshaped, darkened spots, dorsally with two symmetrical longitudinal dark bands, strongly serrated, sometimes not continuous. Sternum with distinct pale median band, posteriorly very narrow or fused (sometimes with small dark spot in the middle of the posterior half of the pale median band), and three symmetrical pairs of pale dots laterally. Opisthosoma dark brownish, laterally moderately yellowish mottled, dorsally with a reddish median band, in some specimens strongly expressed, in others absent. Anteriolaterally of red median band, short black bands and more laterally yellowish. More posteriodorsally there are one or two symmetrical white spots and four to five indistinct chevrons more posteriad. Legs annulated, very differently expressed. Colulus partly darkened, ALS moderately darkened, PLS with basal segment darkened, distal segment pale.

Distribution

Reported from the Mediterranean region and Central and northern European countries. Also reported from Central and South America (probably introduced).

Discussion

Individuals of Teg. parietina are the largest spiders of the genus. It can often be found at the entrances of caves but never deep inside, and in buildings. Specimens of this species show high levels of variation in size and in the intensity of the colour pattern, ranging from almost grey and lacking annulations to distinctive patterns with annulations.

Notes

Published as part of Bolzern, Angelo, Burckhardt, Daniel & Hänggi, Ambros, 2013, Phylogeny and taxonomy of European funnel-web spiders of the Tegenaria-Malthonica complex (Araneae: Agelenidae) based upon morphological and molecular data, pp. 723-848 in Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society (Zool. J. Linn. Soc.) (Zool. J. Linn. Soc.) 168 (4) on pages 806-808, DOI: 10.1111/zoj.12040, http://zenodo.org/record/5282985

Files

Files (6.7 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:5494f300779e68a3364e4ad2d09f872f
6.7 kB Download

System files (32.1 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:17b0def88f545595a99d060900c5c989
32.1 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

Biodiversity

Scientific name authorship
Fourcroy
Kingdom
Animalia
Phylum
Arthropoda
Order
Araneae
Family
Agelenidae
Genus
Tegenaria
Species
parietina
Taxon rank
species
Taxonomic concept label
Tegenaria parietina (Fourcroy, 1785) sec. Bolzern, Burckhardt & Hänggi, 2013

References

  • Fourcroy AFd. 1785. Entomologia parisiensis; sive catalogus insectorum quae in Agro parisiensi reperiuntur. Paris.
  • Walckenaer CA. 1805. Tableau des araneides, ou caracteres essentiels des tribus, genres, familles et races que renferme le genre Aranea de Linne, avec la designation des especes comprises dans chacune de ces divisions. Paris: De l'imprimerie de Dentu.
  • Audouin V. 1826. Explication sommaire des planches d'arachnides de l'Egypte et de la Syrie publiees. In: ' Description de l'Egypte. '. Histoire Naturelle 1: 1 - 339.
  • Blackwall J. 1861. A history of the spiders of Great Britain and Ireland. London: Ray Society, Robert Hardwicke.
  • Walckenaer CA. 1842. Histoire naturelle des Insects. Apteres. Volume 2. Paris.
  • Koch CL. 1834. Arachniden. In: Herrich-Schaffer GAW, ed. Deutschlands Insekten. Heft: 122 - 127.
  • Murphy J, Merrett P. 2000. On Trichopus libratus C. M., 1834. Newsletter of the British Arachnological Society 89: 7.
  • Guerin-Meneville F-E. 1829 - 1844. Iconographie du regne animal de G. Cuvier, ou representation d'apres nature de l'une des especes les plus remarquables, et souvent non encore figurees, de chaque genre d'animaux. Aved un text descriptif. 3 Vol. Paris & London.
  • Lucas H. 1846. Histoire naturelle des animaux articules. In: Exploration scientifique de l'Algerie pendant les annees 1840, 1841, 1842. Paris: Publiee par ordre du gouvernement, 89 - 271.
  • Koch CL. 1841. Die Arachniden. Achter Band. Nurnberg: 131.
  • Simon E. 1875. Les Arachnides de France. Vol. 2. Paris: 1 - 350.
  • Oxford G, Merrett P. 2000. Tegenaria ferruginea (Panzer) in Britain, and differences from T. parietina (Fourcroy) (Araneae: Agelenidae). Bulletin of the British Arachnological Society 11: 331 - 334.
  • Locket GH, Millidge AF. 1953. British spiders, volume 2. London: The Ray Society.
  • Roberts MJ. 1985. The spiders of Great Britain and Ireland. Colchester, UK: Harley Books.
  • Levy G. 1996. The agelenid funnel-weaver family and the spider genus Cedicus in Israel (Araneae, Agelenidae and Cybaeidae). Zoologica Scripta 25: 85 - 122.