Published December 1, 2017 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Resistant and susceptible response of finger millet to seedling blast (Pyricularia grisea sacc.)

  • 1. Institute of Agriculture and Animal Science, Tribhuvan University

Description

25 accessions of finger millet, 20 from Parbat and 5 from Khotang, were experimented at nursery stage in randomized complete block design at Institute of Agriculture and Animal Science (IAAS), Rampur, Chitwan from July 2015 to September 2015 to identify the resistance response against seedling blast. Inoculation was done by piling up of diseased leaves in trenches between the beds. Ten plants from each plot were tagged randomly and disease severity was assessed by scoring on a 0-9 scale for 4 times at 6 days interval from 22 days after sowing (DAS) onwards. Dry root and shoot weights of the tagged plants were measured on 43 DAS to access plant biomass. Three accessions failed to geminate. Final disease severity was found to be highest in NGRC05161 (58.5%) and lowest in NGRC05146 (39.3%). Based on total AUDPC, NGRC05143 (664) was found to be least susceptible to seedling blast while NGRC05164 (895) was most susceptible. Disease severity increased up to 34 DAS and decreased thereafter. AUDPC showed continuous increase in decreasing rate. Shoot weight was found to be negatively correlated to mean AUDPC whereas root-to-shoot ratio was positively correlated. Three accessions were categorized as moderately susceptible and rest as susceptible to seedling blast. Accessions collected from Khotang were in general more susceptible to blast than those from Parbat district.

Files

Sharma - ijirr.pdf

Files (460.6 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:01d6e6b6b8fe66d8696e237e4980422f
460.6 kB Preview Download

Additional details

References

  • ABPSD, 2015 Statistical Information of Nepalese agriculture, 2015. Ministry of Agricultural Development, Kathmandu, Nepal.
  • Adipala E 1989. Host range, Morphology and Pathogenicity of the genus Pyricularia in Uganda. East African Agriculture Forum Journal.54: 101-105.
  • Babu TK 2011. Epidemiology, Virulence Diversity and HostPlant Resistance in Blast [Magnaporthe grisea (Hebert) Barr.] of Finger Millet [Eleusinecoracana (L.) Gaertn.]. PhD diss., Acharya NG Ranga Agricultural University, Hyderabad, India.
  • Batsa BK and Tamang DB 1983. Preliminary report on the study of Millet Diseases in Nepal in Maize and Finger Millet. 10th Summer Crops Workshop 1982, 23-28 Jan 1983, Rampur, Chitwan, Nepal.
  • Ghimire SR and Pradhanang PM 1994. Plant Disease Monitoring and Disease Pest Diagnosis 1992\93. LARC working papers no 94/26.
  • Hittalmani S, Leong S and Devos K 2004. Development of High Yielding, Disease Resistant, Drought Tolerant Finger Millet (EleusinecoracanaGaertn). Progress Report of the Mc Knight Foundation funded Project, II year 2003-2004.
  • ICRISAT 2007. Finger Millet. www.icrisat.org/millet, retrieved at 20th April, 2007.
  • Kato H 1974. Epidemiology of Rice Blast Disease. Review of plant protection research7: 1-20.
  • Khadka RB, Shrestha SM, Manandhar HK and K.C. GB 2013. Pathogenic Variability and Differential Interaction of Blast Fungus (Pyricularia griseaSacc.) Isolates with Finger Millet Lines in Nepal. Nepal Journal of Science and Technology. 14(2):17-24.
  • Maindonald J.H. 2008. Using R for Data Analysis and Graphics Introduction, Code and Commentary. Centre for Mathematics and Its Applications, Australian National University.
  • Nagaraja A and Mantur SG 2007. Screening of Eleusinecoracana Germplasm for Blast Resistance. Journal of Mycopathological Research. 45(1): 66-68.
  • NARC 1997. Finger Millet Research Report. In: Annual Report 1997. NARC, Khumaltar, Lalitpur, Nepal.
  • Sharma S, 1995. Response of Rice and Finger Millet Genotype against major Diseases. LARC working papers no 96/54.
  • Shrestha SM and Misra NK 1994. Evaluation of common Cultivars of Rice against Leaf and Neck Blast in Nepal. Journal of Institute of agriculture and animal science. 15:101-103
  • Sreenivasaprasad S, Chipili J and Muthumeenakshi S 2001. Diversity and Dynamics of Phytopathogenic Fungi: Application of Molecular Tools. In Proceedings of the 11th Mediterranean Phytopathological Congress. 17-20 Sep 2001, University of Evora, Portugal. pp. 21-22.
  • Subedi N and Budathoki CB 1996. Evaluation of Finger Millet Lines for Maize /Millet System and Examination of the Source-Sink Relationship in Finger Millet. LARC working paper no 69/31.
  • Todman AK, DR Pawar and MS Joshi 1994. Host Reactions to Finger Millet (Pyricularia grisea Sacc). Mysore Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 28: 45-46.
  • Viji G, Gnanamanickam SS and Levy M 2000. DNA Polymorphisms of Isolates of Magnaporthe grisea from India that are Pathogenic to Finger Millet and Rice. Mycological Research. 104(2): 161-167.
  • Vishwanath S, Sanne Gowda S, Seetharam A and Shankare Gowda BT 1986. Reaction to Blast Disease of released and pre-released Varieties of Finger Millet from different states. Millet Newsletter. 5: 31.
  • Wiley, J. 2014. Wiley StatsRef: Statistical Reference online: onlinelibrary.wiley.com.
  • Yeh, W.H. and Bonman, J.M. 1986. Assessment of Partial Resistance to Pyricularia orizae in six Rice Cultivars. Plant Pathol. 35:319-323.