There is a newer version of the record available.

Published October 25, 2022 | Version v1
Software Open

Social learning data in a foraging setting for Heliconius erato

  • 1. Federal University of Rio de Janeiro
  • 2. University of Bristol

Description

Insects may acquire social information by active communication and through inadvertent social cues. In a foraging setting, the latter may indicate the presence and quality of resources. Although social learning in foraging contexts is prevalent in eusocial species, this behaviour has been hypothesised to also exist between conspecifics in non-social species with sophisticated behaviours, including Heliconius butterflies. Heliconius are the only butterfly genus with active pollen feeding, a dietary innovation associated with a specialised, spatially faithful foraging behaviour known as trap-lining. Long-standing hypotheses suggest that Heliconius may acquire trap-line information by following experienced individuals. Indeed, Heliconius often aggregate in social roosts, which could act as 'information centres', and present conspecific following behaviour, enhancing opportunities for social learning. Here, we provide a direct test of social learning ability in Heliconius using an associative learning task in which naïve individuals completed a colour preference test in the presence of demonstrators trained to feed randomly or with a strong colour preference. We found no evidence that Heliconius erato, which roost socially, used social information in this task. Combined with existing field studies our results add to data which contradict the hypothesised role of social learning in Heliconius foraging behaviour.

Notes

Statistical analysis

Data were analysed using linear mixed-effects models in R using the lme4 package [42]. First, we asked whether demonstrators from different groups preferred the rewarding colour, using a binomial LMM with response variable 'preference for rewarding colour' (proportion of landings on purple flowers) and fixed factor 'group' (control and knowledgeable). Then, for observers, we examined whether there were intergroup differences in preference for rewarding colour over time, using a binomial LMM with response variable 'preference for rewarding colour' and fixed factors 'group' (control and knowledgeable) and 'trial day' (1 to 4). In the latter, identity was set as a random effect due to repeated measures. Finally, we analysed whether observers preferred flowers occupied by demonstrators using a binomial LMM with response variable 'local preference' (0 = no; 1 = yes) and fixed factors 'group' (control and knowledgeable) and 'trial day' (1 to 4).

Funding provided by: NERC independent research fellowship*
Crossref Funder Registry ID:
Award Number:

Files

Files (7.4 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:36a5c1444e69640a9df4234bc4928dbf
7.4 kB Download

Additional details

Related works

Is source of
10.5061/dryad.7h44j0zwz (DOI)