Published May 15, 2022 | Version v1
Dataset Open

Nest choice in arboreal ants is an emergent consequence of network creation under spatial constraints

  • 1. Harvey Mudd College
  • 2. Imperial College London
  • 3. George Washington University
  • 4. University of York

Description

Biological transportation networks must balance competing functional priorities. The self-organizing mechanisms used to generate such networks have inspired scalable algorithms to construct and maintain low-cost and efficient human-designed transport networks. The pheromone-based trail networks of ants have been especially valuable in this regard. Here, we use turtle ants as our focal system: In contrast to the ant species usually used as models for self-organized networks, these ants live in a spatially constrained arboreal environment where both nesting options and connecting pathways are limited. Thus, they must solve a distinct set of challenges which resemble those faced by human transport engineers constrained by existing infrastructure. Here, we ask how a turtle ant colony's choice of which nests to include in a network may be influenced by their potential to create connections to other nests. In laboratory experiments with Cephalotes varians and Cephalotes texanus, we show that nest choice is influenced by spatial constraints, but in unexpected ways. Under one spatial configuration, colonies preferentially occupied more connected nest sites; however, under another spatial configuration, this preference disappeared. Comparing the results of these experiments to an agent-based model, we demonstrate that this apparently idiosyncratic relationship between nest connectivity and nest choice can emerge without nest preferences via a combination of self-reinforcing random movement along constrained pathways and density-dependent aggregation at nests. While this mechanism does not consistently lead to the de-novo construction of low-cost, efficient transport networks, it may be an effective way to expand a network, when coupled with processes of pruning and restructuring.

Notes

There are two different sections of each arena, with the nest type corresponding to the section it is in. Note that the nest types here labeled as "R" and "D" are referred to as "F" (fully connected section) and "L" (linearly connected section), respectively, in the accompanying paper.

Funding provided by: National Science Foundation
Crossref Funder Registry ID: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000001
Award Number: IOS 1755425

Funding provided by: National Science Foundation
Crossref Funder Registry ID: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000001
Award Number: IOS 1755406

Funding provided by: National Science Foundation
Crossref Funder Registry ID: http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000001
Award Number: DEB 1442256

Files

Fall_2017_Periodic_Checking_of_Ants_-_Colony_10_(V6).csv

Additional details

Related works

Is cited by
10.1007/s11721-021-00187-5 (DOI)
Is derived from
10.5281/zenodo.6547741 (DOI)
Is source of
10.5281/zenodo.6547743 (DOI)