Published August 14, 2018 | Version v1
Taxonomic treatment Open

Haustoriidae Stebbing 1906

Description

Key to the Haustoriidae of the Gulf of Mexico

(modified from LeCroy 2002; Winfield et al. 2007; Sweet 1996)

1. Pleonite 3 overhanging urosome......................................................................... 2

- Pleonite 3 not overhanging urosome...................................................................... 16

2. Epimeron 3 rounded posteroventrally without tooth........................................................... 3

- Epimeron 3 rounded posteroventrally with tooth............................................................. 7

3. Rostrum exceeding ½ length of antenna 1 peduncular segment 1, acute; maxilla 2 outer plate narrow, lanceolate distally; pereopod 6, article 5 anterodistal margin rounded; uropod 1 peduncle with at least 3 proximal spines..................................................................................... Haustorius canadensis (Atlantic) Bousfield, 1962

- Rostrum less than ½ length of antenna 1 peduncular segment 1, subacute; maxilla 2 outer plate broad; uropod 1 peduncle with less than 2 proximal spines... Haustorius spp. (Gulf of Mexico)................................................. 4

4. Antenna 1 accessory flagellum 4–5 articulate; mandible with 8+ accessory blades; mandibular palp article 3 with 15+ spines in comb row; uropod 1 interramal area with 3 large spines..................... Haustorius jayneae Foster & LeCroy, 1991

- Antenna 1 accessory flagellum 2–3 articulate; mandible with less than 8 accessory blades; mandibular palp 3 with 12 or less spines in comb row; uropod 1 interramal area with 2 or less large spines.......................................... 5

5. Maxilla 2 outer plate very broad, minutely curved; pereopod 3, article 5 with posterior cup equal or slightly exceeding length of anterior margin; pereopod 6, article 5 distal margin with minute notch, not medially produced; telson cleft almost to base...................................................................................................... 6

- Maxilla 2 outer plate broad, lunate; pereopod 3, article 5 with posterior cup greater than 1.2x length of anterior margin; pereopod 6, article 5 anterodistal margin with distinct notch, medially produced; telson cleft 1/3 distance to base.............................................................................................. Haustorius galvezi sp. nov.

6. Antenna 1 accessory flagellum with 3 articles; mandible, incisor trifid; mandibular palp, article 3 with 5 spines in comb row; pereopod 5 coxa ovoid, not compressed medially; pereopod 6 article 4 proximal margin set-off from posterior margin, 2 spine groups............................................................... Haustorius mexicanus Ortiz et al., 2001

- Antenna 1 accessory flagellum with 2–3 articles; mandible, incisor bifid; mandibular palp, article 3 with 8 or more spines in comb row; pereopod 5 coxa dumbbell-shaped, compressed medially forming anterior and posterior lobes; pereopod 6 article 4 proximal margin continuous with posterior margin, only setae............................. Haustorius allardi sp. nov.

7. Accessory flagellum with 2 articles, inserted subterminally; maxilla 2 outer and inner plates roughly equal in length; maxilla 1 without bailer; uropod 1 inner ramus broad and longer than outer ramus; telson deeply notched, forming a V............................................................................. Pseudohaustorius carolinensis Bousfield, 1965

- Accessory flagellum with 2 articles, inserted terminally; maxilla 2 outer plate longer than inner; maxilla 1 with bailer; uropod 1 inner ramus slender and shorter than outer… Acanthohaustorius ............................................... 8

8. Uropod 1, peduncle very short with stubby spines........................... Acanthohaustorius bousfieldi Frame, 1980

- Uropod 1, peduncle with moderate to long slender spines...................................................... 9

9. Epimeron 3 posterior margin strongly recurved as a large shelf overhanging urosome................................................................................................ Acanthohaustorius intermedius Bousfield, 1965

- Epimeron 3 posterior margin decurved or recurved, slightly overhanging urosome................................. 10

10. Uropod 1 peduncle with stout, dorsally hooked interramal spine.................. Acanthohaustorius unicus, Foster, 1989

- Uropod 1 peduncle lacking stout hooked spine, with or without long curved spine................................. 11

11. Uropod 1 peduncle with long, stout distal spine greater in length than other interramal spines; outer ramus with stout apical spine subequal or shorter than subapical spines......................... Acanthohaustorius shoemakeri Bousfield, 1965

- Uropod 1 peduncle with distal spine not stouter or longer than other interramal spines; outer ramus with stout apical spine much shorter than subapical spines....................................................................... 12

12. Coxa 7, posterior lobe rounded or subacute; uropod 1 peduncle with very long, slender spines along dorsolateral margin, all roughly equal in length................................................................................ 13

- Coxa 7, posterior lobe acute posteriorly; uropod 1 peduncle with moderately long spines decreasing in length distally..... 14

13. Pereopod 6, article 5 bearing 4–7 long spines along distal margin; pereopod 7, article 5 posterior margin with 1–2 setae proximally to posterodistal angle; epimeron 3, posterodistal tooth slender and sharply curved; uropod 1 without ventral spines.......................................................................... Acanthohaustorius sp. A LeCroy, 2002

- Pereopod 6, article 5 with 1–3 short spines on distal margin; pereopod 7, article 5 without setae cluster; epimeron 3, posterodistal tooth short and stout; uropod 1 peduncle with 2–3 ventral spines..... Acanthohaustorius pansus Thomas & Barnard, 1984

14. Pereopod 6, article 5 with 9–10 spine groups on lateral surface; uropod 1 peduncle with 8–10 spines on dorsal margin............................................................................ Acanthohaustorius similis Frame, 1980

- Pereopod 6, article 5 with 3–7 spine groups on lateral surface; uropod 1 peduncle with 2–4 spines on dorsal margin....... 15

15. Pereopod 7, article 5 posterior margin evenly convex, lacking spines proximal to posterodistal angle; epimeron 3 posteroventral tooth very long, extending to pleonal notch; uropod 1 peduncle lacking ventral spines, inner ramus with 2 long apical setae................................................................... Acanthohaustorius millsi Bousfield, 1965

- Pereopod 7, article 5 posterior margin obtuse, 1–2 spines proximal to posterodistal angle; epimeron 3 posteroventral tooth moderately long but not reaching pleonal notch; uropod 1 peduncle with 1 ventral spine, inner ramus without long apical setae Acanthohaustorius sp. C LeCroy, 2002

16. Antenna 2, peduncular article 5 without expanded posterodistal lobe; mandible with incisor process; uropod 2 biramous; telson cleft into a V or entirely to base......................................................................... 17

- Antenna 2, peduncular article 5 with strong posterodistal lobe; mandible lacking incisor process; uropod 2 uniramous; telson entire or emarginate..................................................... Neohaustorius schmitzi Bousfield, 1965

17. Mandibular palp, article 3 with median row of comb setae; pereopod 6, article 5 distal margin subequal to the length of article 6; pereopod 7, article 4 roughly triangular; telson cleft nearly to base… Lepidactylus ............................... 18

- Mandibular palp, article 3 with proximal or distal row of comb setae; pereopod 6, article 5 distal margin less than the length of article 6; pereopod 6, article 4 subrectangular with posterior margin bearing 3–4 spines (occasionally subtriangular, if so coxa 7 is acute posteriorly)................................................................................. 19

18. Antenna 1, accessory flagellum with 2 articles; pereopod 7, article 2 posterior margin lined with setae; uropod 1 peduncle lined with spines continuously and with 1 long, hooked interramal spine; telson lobes narrowly separated................................................................................................ Lepidactylus dystiscus Say, 1818

- Antenna 1, accessory flagellum with 2-5 articles; pereopod 7, article 2 without setae along posterior margin; uropod 1 peduncle not continuously lined with spines and with 3–4 slender interramal spines; telson lobes deeply separated.......................................................................... Lepidactylus triarticulatus Robertson & Shelton, 1980

19. Antenna 1 geniculate; article 3 of mandibular palp with proximal setae; maxilla 2 outer plate subequal to inner; article 6 of pereopod 6 with or without distal spine on posterior margin; uropod 2 reduced, biramous....................................................................................... Protohaustorius bousfieldi Robertson & Shelton, 1978

- Antenna 1 not geniculate; article 3 of mandibular palp with distal setae; maxilla 2 outer plate much longer than inner; article 6 of pereopod 6 with 3–4 distal spines on posterior margin; uropod 2 well-developed, biramous… Parahaustorius ......... 20

20. Pereopod 6, article 4 roughly longer than article 5, with 4 rows of setae; article 6 without setae; pereopod 7, article 6 with long setae at apex......................................................... Parahaustorius holmesi Bousfield, 1965

- Pereopod 6, article 4 subequal in length to article 5, with 5 rows of setae; article 6 with setae; pereopod 7, article 6 with short setae at apex....................................................... Parahaustorius attenuatus Bousfield, 1965

Notes

Published as part of Hancock, Zachary B. & Wicksten, Mary K., 2018, Two new species of sand-burrowing amphipods of the genus Haustorius Müller, 1775 (Amphipoda: Haustoriidae) from the northwestern Gulf of Mexico, pp. 101-127 in Zootaxa 4459 (1) on pages 123-125, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4459.1.4, http://zenodo.org/record/1458410

Files

Files (10.9 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:4943e78b4e3aab20bfce93e1aad48951
10.9 kB Download

System files (36.2 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:7930eaebdfa443dad9c9688cd9293543
36.2 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

Biodiversity

Family
Haustoriidae
Kingdom
Animalia
Order
Amphipoda
Phylum
Arthropoda
Scientific name authorship
Stebbing
Taxon rank
family
Taxonomic concept label
Haustoriidae Stebbing, 1906 sec. Hancock & Wicksten, 2018

References

  • LeCroy, S. E. (2002) An Illustrated Identification Guide to the Nearshore Marine and Estuarine Gammaridean Amphipoda of Florida. Vol. 2. State of Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Tallahassee, 224 pp.
  • Winfield, I., Escobar-Briones, E. & Alvarez, F. (2007) Clave para la Identificacion de los Anfipodos Bentonicos del Golfo de Mexico y el Sector Norte del mar Caribe. Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Mexico City, 197 pp.
  • Sweet, M. H. (1996) The Evolution of the Haustorioidea of the World, and Post-Embryonic Development, Taxonomy and Ecology of the Haustoriidae (Amphipoda: Crustacea). Texas A & M University, College Station, 640 pp. [PhD thesis]
  • Bousfield, E. L. (1962) New haustoriid amphipods from the Canadian Atlantic region. Bulletin of the National Museum of Canada, 183, 63 - 75.
  • Foster, J. M. & LeCroy, S. E. (1991) Haustorius jayneae, a new species of haustoriid amphipod from the northern Gulf of Mexico, with notes on its ecology at Panama City Beach, Florida. Gulf Research Reports, 8 (3), 259 - 270. https: // doi. org / 10.18785 / grr. 0803.06
  • Ortiz, M., Chazaro-Olvera, S. & Winfield, I. (2001) A new amphipod crustacean of the genus Haustorius (Gammaridea, Haustoriidae), from the east coast of Mexico. Avicennia, 14, 53 - 59.
  • Bousfield, E. L. (1965) Haustoriidae of New England (Crustacea: Amphipoda). Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 117 (3512), 159 - 239. https: // doi. org / 10.5479 / si. 00963801.117 - 3512.159
  • Frame, A. B. (1980) Two new species of sand burrowing amphipod crustaceans from Long Island Sound and the New York Bight (Amphipoda: Haustoriidae). Estuaries, 3 (2), 75 - 83. https: // doi. org / 10.2307 / 1351550
  • Foster, J. M. (1989) Acanthohaustorius uncinus, a new species of sand-burrowing amphipod from the northern Gulf of Mexico, with notes on its ecology (Haustoriidae: Haustoriinae). Gulf Research Reports, 8 (2), 189 - 197. https: // doi. org / 10.18785 / grr. 0802.10
  • Thomas, J. D. & Barnard, J. L. (1984) Acanthohaustorius pansus, a new species of sand-burrowing amphipod from Looe Key Reef, Florida Keys, with redescription of A. bousfieldi Frame, 1980 (Amphipoda: Haustoriidae). Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 97 (4), 909 - 926.
  • Say, T. (1818) An account of the Crustacea of the United States. Journal of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, 1 (1), 374 - 401.
  • Roberston, P. B. & Shelton, C. R. (1980) Lepidactylus triarticulatus n. sp., a new haustoriid amphipod from the northern Gulf of Mexico. Gulf Research Reports, 6 (4), 415 - 420. https: // doi. org / 10.18785 / grr. 0604.09
  • Roberston, P. B. & Shelton, C. R. (1978) Two new species of haustoriid amphipods (Crustacea: Amphipoda) from the northwestern Gulf of Mexico. Contributions in Marine Science, 21, 47 - 62.