Biodiversity Literature Repository
Published October 1, 2016 | Version v1
Journal article Restricted

Proteocephalid tapeworms (Cestoda: Onchoproteocephalidea) of loaches (Cobitoidea): Evidence for monophyly and high endemism of parasites in the Far East

Creators

Description

Tomáš Scholz, Alain de Chambrier, Takeshi Shimazu, Alexey Ermolenko, Andrea Waeschenbach (2017): Proteocephalid tapeworms (Cestoda: Onchoproteocephalidea) of loaches (Cobitoidea): Evidence for monophyly and high endemism of parasites in the Far East. Parasitology International 66: 871-883, DOI: 10.1016/j.parint.2016.09.016

Files

Restricted

The record is publicly accessible, but files are restricted to users with access.

Linked records

Additional details

Identifiers

LSID
urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:9F1707346F7DFF9BFFA20368FFB1FFAD

Has part
http://treatment.plazi.org/id/632E7F4C6F79FF9FFFD307B2FBE3F93C (URL)
http://treatment.plazi.org/id/632E7F4C6F79FF9CFC9E05DCFDC6F964 (URL)
http://treatment.plazi.org/id/632E7F4C6F7AFF91FFF80584FD60FD70 (URL)
http://treatment.plazi.org/id/632E7F4C6F77FF91FFD30068FB16FE07 (URL)
10.5281/zenodo.580885 (DOI)
urn:lsid:plazi.org:fig:3-96-1466-147-1414 (LSID)
http://zenodo.org/record/580885 (URL)
10.5281/zenodo.580886 (DOI)
urn:lsid:plazi.org:fig:4-333-1278-144-738 (LSID)
http://zenodo.org/record/580886 (URL)
10.5281/zenodo.580887 (DOI)
urn:lsid:plazi.org:fig:6-257-1353-144-1536 (LSID)
http://zenodo.org/record/580887 (URL)
10.5281/zenodo.580888 (DOI)
urn:lsid:plazi.org:fig:7-234-1330-144-1093 (LSID)
http://zenodo.org/record/580888 (URL)
10.5281/zenodo.580889 (DOI)
urn:lsid:plazi.org:fig:8-238-1373-144-1679 (LSID)
http://zenodo.org/record/580889 (URL)
10.5281/zenodo.580890 (DOI)
urn:lsid:plazi.org:fig:9-234-1330-144-1294 (LSID)
http://zenodo.org/record/580890 (URL)
10.5281/zenodo.580891 (DOI)
urn:lsid:plazi.org:fig:10-182-1430-1282-1936 (LSID)
http://zenodo.org/record/580891 (URL)

References

  • [1] M. Kottelat, Conspectus cobitidum: an inventory of the loaches of the world (Teleostei: Cypriniformes: Cobitidei), Raffles Bull. Zool. 26 (2012) 1-199 (Suppl.).
  • [2] R. Froese, D. Pauly, FishBaseWorld Wide Web electronic publication. www.fishbase. org, version (01/2016), Froese and Pauly, editors 2016.
  • [3] D.I. Gibson, R.A. Bray, E.A. Harris, Host-Parasite Database of the Natural History Museum, London, http://www.nhm.ac.uk/research-curation/scientific-resources/taxonomy-systematics/host-parasites/2005 Compilers.
  • [4] T. Scholz, M. Oros, E. Bazsalovicsova, J. Brabec, A. Waeschenbach, B.-W. Xi, A. Aydogdu, V. Besprozvannykh, T. Shimazu, I. Kralova-Hromadova, D.T.J. Littlewood, Molecular evidence of cryptic diversity in Paracaryophyllaeus (Cestoda: Caryophyllidea), parasites of loaches (Cobitidae) in Eurasia, including description of P. vladkae n. sp. Parasitol. Int. 63 (2014) 841-850.
  • [5] V.I. Freze, Proteocephalata in fish, amphibians and reptiles, in: KI. Skrjabin (Ed.) Essentials of Cestodology, V, Nauka, Moscow, 1965 English translation, Israel Program of Scientific Translation, 1969, Cat. No. 1853.
  • [6] G.D.Schmidt, CRC Handbook of Tapeworm Identification, CRC Press Inc., Boca Raton, Florida, 1986.
  • [7] A. de Chambrier, A. Waeschenbach, M. Fisseha, T. Scholz, J. Mariaux, A large 28S rDNA-based phylogeny confirms the limitations of established morphological characters for classification of proteocephalidean tapeworms (Platyhelminthes, Cestoda), ZooKeys 500 (2015) 25-59.
  • [8] A. Skerikova, V. Hypsa, T. Scholz, Phylogenetic analysis of European species of Proteocephalus (Cestoda: Proteocephalidea): compatibility of molecular and morphological data, and parasite-host coevolution, Int. J. Parasitol. 31 (2001) 1121-1128.
  • [9] A. de Chambrier, M.P. Zehnder, C. Vaucher, J. Mariaux, The evolution of the Proteocephalidea (Platyhelminthes, Eucestoda) based on an enlarged molecular phylogeny, with comments on their uterine development, Syst. Parasitol. 57 (2004) 159-171.
  • [10] V. Hypsa, A. Skerikova, T. Scholz, Phylogeny, evolution and host-parasite relationships of the order Proteocephalidea (Eucestoda) as revealed by combined analysis and secondary structure characters, Parasitology 130 (2005) 359-371.
  • [11] T. Scholz, V. Hanzelova, A. Skerikova, T. Shimazu, L. Rolbiecki, An annotated list of species of the Proteocephalus Weinland, 1858 aggregate sensu de Chambrier et al. (2004) (Cestoda: Proteocephalidea), parasites of freshwater fishes in the Palaearctic Region, their phylogenetic relationships and key to identification, Syst. Parasitol. 67 (2007) 139-156.
  • [12] T. Scholz, V. Hanzelova, Tapeworms of the genus Proteocephalus Weinland, 1858 (Cestoda: Proteocephalidae), parasites of fishes in Europe, Studie AV CR, 2/98, Academia, Prague, 1998.
  • [13] T. Scholz, A. Skerikova, V. Hanzelova, B. Koubkova, V. Barus, Resurrection of Proteocephalus sagittus (Grimm, 1872) (Cestoda: Proteocephalidea) based on morphological and molecular data, Syst. Parasitol. 56 (2003) 173-181.
  • [14] F. Pleijel, U. Jondelius, E. Norlinder, A. Nygren, B. Oxelman, C. Schander, P. Sundberg, M. Thollesson, Phylogenies without roots? A plea for the use of vouchers in molecular phylogenetic studies, Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 48 (2008) 369-371.
  • [15] A.de Chambrier, A new tapeworm from the Amazon, Amazotaenia yvettae n. gen., n. sp. (Eucestoda: Proteocephalidea), from the siluriform fishes Brachyplatystoma fi lamentosum and B. vaillanti (Pimelodidae), Rev. Suisse Zool. 108 (2001) 303-316.
  • [16] R. Kuchta, J.N. Caira, Three new species of Echinobothrium (Cestoda: Diphyllidea) from Indo-Pacific stingrays of the genus Pastinachus, Folia Parasitol. 57 (2010) 185-196.
  • [17] L. Chervy, Unified terminology for cestode microtriches: a proposal from the international workshops on cestode systematics in 2002-2008, Folia Parasitol. 56 (2009) 199-230.
  • [18] T. Scholz, A. de Chambrier, R. Kuchta, D.T.J. Littlewood, A. Waeschenbach, Macrobothriotaenia fi cta (Cestoda: Proteocephalidea), a parasite of sunbeam snake (Xenopeltis unicolor): example of convergent evolution, Zootaxa 3640 (2013) 485-499.
  • [19] T.Shimazu, Some species of the genus Proteocephalus (Cestoidea: Proteocephalidae) from Japanese freshwater fishes, with a description of a new species, Jpn. J. Parasitol. 39 (1990) 612-624.
  • [20] K. Katoh, D.M. Standley, MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability, Mol. Biol. Evol. 30 (2013) 772-780.
  • [21] M. Wu, S. Chatterji, J.A. Eisen, Accounting for alignment uncertainty in phylogenomics, PLoS One 7 (2012), e30288.
  • [22] J.A.A.Nylander, MrModeltest v2, Program distributed by the author Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, 2004 https://www.abc.se/~nylander/.
  • [23] F.Ronquist, M.Teslenko, P. van der Mark, D.L. Ayres, A. Darling,S.Hohna, B.Larget, L. Liu, M.A. Suchard, J.P. Huelsenbeck, MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space, Syst. Biol. 61 (2012) 539-542.
  • Dissertation The University of Texas at Austin, 2006 http://www.phylo.org/archive/ pdf̲docs/zwicklDissertation.pdf.
  • [25] D.L. Swofford, PAUP 4.0-Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony. Version 4, Sinauer, Sunderland, Mass., 2003
  • [26] O. Grimm, Zur Kenntnis einiger wenig bekannten Binnenwurmer, Nachrichten Konigl Gesselschaft Wissenschaften Georg-Augusts-Univ Gottingen, 12, 1872, pp. 240-250.
  • [27] U.D. Dzhalilov, M. Ashurova, A new species of Proteocephalus Weinland, 1858 from fishes of the Pamir basin], Izv. Akad. Nauk. Tadzhik SSR, Otdel Biol. Nauk. 3 (1971) 110-111 in Russian.
  • [28] J. Jarkovsky, B. Koubkova, T. Scholz, M. Prokes, V. Barus, Seasonal dynamics of Proteocephalus sagittus (Cestoda: Proteocephalidae) in stone loach (Barbatula barbatula) from the Hana River, Czech Republic, J. Helminthol. 78 (2004) 225-229.
  • [29] G.R. La Rue, A revision of the cestode family Proteocephalidae, Zool. Anz. 38 (1911) 473-482.
  • [30] T. Scholz, R. Drabek, V. Hanzelova, Scolex morphology of Proteocephalus tapeworms (Cestoda: Proteocephalidae), parasites of freshwater fish in the Palaearctic region, Folia Parasitol. 45 (1998) 27-43.
  • [31] S.D. Titova, E.G. Skripchenko, Parasite fauna of Novosibirsk water reservoir in fifth year after its construction, Materials to the 8th Meeting of the Western Branch of the Ichthyological Society. Novosibirsk 1963, pp. 141-150 in Russian.
  • [32] E.A. Rumyantsev, E.V. Permyakov, E.L. Alekseeva, Parasite fauna of fishes from Lake Onega and its long-term variations, Sbor. Nauch. Trudov GOSNIORKH Leningrad 216 (1984) 117-133 In Russian.
  • [33] A. de Chambrier, T.T. Binh, T. Scholz, Ophiotaenia bungari n. sp. (Cestoda), a parasite of Bungarus fasciatus (Schneider) (Ophidia: Elapidae) from Vietnam, with comments on relative ovarian size as a new and potentially useful diagnostic character for proteocephalidean tapeworms, Syst. Parasitol. 81 (2012) 39-50.
  • [34] T. Shimazu, Digeneans parasitic in freshwater fishes (Osteichthyes) of Japan. I. Aprocotylidae, Bivesiclulidae and Haploporidae, Bull. Natl. Mus. Nat. Sci. Ser. A 39 (2013) 167-184.
  • [36] T. Scholz, V.V. Besprozvannykh, T.E. Boutorina, A. Choudhury, T.H. Cribb, A.V. Ermolenko, A. Faltynkova, M.B. Shedko, T. Shimazu, N.J. Smit, Trematode diversity in freshwater fishes of the Globe I: 'Old World', Syst. Parasitol. 93 (2016) 257-269.
  • [37] T. Scholz, R. Ergens, Cestodes of fish from Mongolia, Acta Soc. Zool. Bohemoslov 54 (1990) 287-304.
  • [38] J.G. Baer, Phylogenie et cycles evolutifs des Cestodes, Rev. Suisse Zool. 57 (1950) 553-558.
  • [39] G.Y. Zmeev, Trematodes and cestodes of the Amur River, Parazitol. Sb. 6 (1936) 305-346 In Russian.
  • [40] A.K. Akhmerov, Tapeworms of fish of the River Amur, Trudy GELAN SSSR 10 (1960) 15-31 In Russian.
  • [41] M.N. Dubinina, Cestodes from fishes of the Amur basin, Parazitol. Sb. 25 (1971) 77-119 in Russian.
  • [42] S.Q. Liu, R.L. Mayden, J.B. Zhang, D. Yu, Q.Y. Tang, X. Deng, H.Z. Liu, Phylogenetic relationships of the Cobitoidea (Teleostei:Cypriniformes) inferred from mitochondrial and nuclear genes with analyses of gene evolution, Gene 508 (2012) 60-72.
  • [43] A. Perdices, J. Bohlen, V. Slechtova, I. Doadrio, Molecular evidence for multiple origins of the European spined loaches (Teleostei, Cobitidae), PLoS One 11 (2016), e0144628.
  • [44] M. Zhu, F. Liu, Mitochondrial genome sequence of Paramisgurnus dabryanus from the Yellow River estuary: implication for Cobitidae phylogeny, Mitochondrial DNA 27 (2016) 3039-3040.
  • [45] A. Yamada, Y. Kodo, M. Murakami, M. Kuroda, T. Aoki, T. Fujimoto, K. Arai, Hybrid origin of gynogenetic clones and the introgression of their mitochondrial genome into sexual diploids through meiotic hybridogenesis in the loach, Misgurnus anguillicuadatus, J. Exp. Zool. A Ecol. Genet. Physiol. 323 (2015) 593-606.
  • [46] AYa Taranetz, About zoogeography of Amur Transition Area on a basis of investigations of freshwater ichthyofauna, Vestnik DVF AS USSR 32 (5) (1936) 99-116 In Russian.
  • [47] L.S. Berg, Fishes of Fresh Waters of the USSR and Adjoining Territories, 1-3, Publishing House of AS USSR, Moscow-Leningrad, 1948-1949 In Russian.
  • [48] A.V. Gussev, Monogenetic trematodes of fish of the Amur river system, Trudy Zool. Inst. Akad. Nauk. SSSR 19 (1955) 172-398 In Russian.
  • [49] G.V. Nikolsky, Fishes of the Amur River System, Publishing House of AS USSR, Moscow, 1956 In Russian.
  • [50] Y.A. Strelkov, S.S. Shulman, Eco-faunistic analysis of parasite fauna of fish of the Amur river basin, Parazitol. Sb. Zool. Inst. Leningrad: Nauka 25 (1971) 196-292 in Russian.
  • [51] P. Banarescu, Principles and Problems of Zoogeography, Subotica, Yugoslavia, 1975.