Coprophagy in Caribbean parrotfishes
Description
Parrotfishes are widely considered to be important grazers on coral reefs that remove autotrophic biomass from the reef substrate and create bare space that is conducive to larval coral settlement and recruitment. Because of the top-down effects associated with their benthic foraging, this has been a major focus of parrotfish research. Another aspect of parrotfish foraging and trophic ecology that has received very little attention is coprophagy, the consumption of fecal matter. The feces of planktivorous fishes, including Chromis spp., have been identified as important sources of nutrients and trace elements to tropical and temperate reef ecosystems. Their feces are readily consumed by a variety of fishes, including parrotfishes. Although parrotfish coprophagy has been observed in prior studies, its frequency has not yet been quantified. In this study, we observed foraging in five parrotfishes on the fringing reefs of Bonaire, Netherlands: Scarus iseri, Scarus taeniopterus, Scarus vetula, Sparisoma aurofrenatum, and Sparisoma viride. For three of these species, we observed individuals of both ontogenetic phases (terminal and initial phase) to investigate ontogenetic differences in foraging. We found that coprophagy was common in four of these species (Sc. iseri, Sc. taeniopterus, Sc. vetula, and Sp. aurofrenatum), occurring in 46-90% of individuals (Sc. vetula and Sc. taeniopterus, respectively). Though we did not identify the origin of every fecal pellet consumed, we directly observed focal fishes targeting fecal pellets produced by planktivorous Chromis spp. that were often seen schooling above the reef during this feeding behavior. Additionally, most of the fecal pellets consumed by the parrotfishes were similar in appearance (i.e., relative size, shape, coloration, and consistency) to the feces produced by Chromis spp., predominantly Chromis multilineata, suggesting this common origin. However, bites on fecal matter were a relatively small proportion of the total bites taken by these species (< 5%). In contrast, a majority of bites taken by these species were taken on substrates classified as eplithic algal matrix (EAM) or crustose coralline algae (68.5-90.6% of total bites across all five species). Despite being an infrequent target of parrotfish foraging, we estimated that daily fecal C consumption is equivalent to approximately 27% of the daily algal C intake by parrotfishes targeting the major benthic foraging targets of parrotfishes (large turfs, small turfs on endolithic algae or crustose coralline algae, and crustose coralline algae) in Bonaire. The feces of plantivorous reef fishes like Chromis spp. are also likely a valuable source of nutrients to reef fishes, because the fecese of Chromis spp. has higher protein and lipid content and lower C:N and C:P than many benthic marine algae and cyanobacteria, including from the tropics. The absence of coprophagy in Sp. viride and reduced rates of coprophagy in Sc. vetula relative to the other coprophagic species could be the result of increased access to protein-rich endolithic components of the benthos. Access to endolithic components of the benthos increases with body size and the ability to excavate benthic substrate while foraging. Sparisoma viride is an important excavating parrotfish on Caribbean coral reefs, and Sc. vetula is generally larger than the other coprophagic species in our study. Future work should attempt to further quantify the contribution of fecal matter to the nutrition of parrotfishes relative to benthic foraging targets in order to provide a more complete understanding of parrotfish nutritional ecology and to elucidate the importance of coprophagy in nutrient recycling and retention on coral reefs.
Notes
parrotfishes.csv metadata:
Site - Fringing Reef Sites: AC, Angel City; AQ, Aquarius; BB, Bachelor's Beach; IV, Invisibles; TL, The Lake.
NamePhase - Common name and ontogenetic phase (initial and terminal phase; IP and TP, respectively) of the parrotfishes observed.
CommonName - Common names of parrotfishes observed.
ScientificName - Scientific names of parrotfishes observed.
Transect - Transect number (e.g., T1 is transect 1).
Bin - Parrotfishes were binned by forklength (cm) and these values indicate size class that fishes were binned into (e.g., B6.10 is for fishes 6-10cm forklength).
AvgLength - The average forklength (cm) for each bin.
Density - Counts of parrotfishes per 100-m2 band transect (25-m x 4-m) for a given species/phase/bin.
Biomass - Biomass (g 100 m-2) of each row calculated using AvgLength, Density, and species-specific published length-weight ratios (Bohnsack and Harper 1988).
benthic-cover.csv metadata:
Site - Fringing Reef Sites: AC, Angel City; AQ, Aquarius; BB, Bachelor's Beach; IV, Invisibles; TL, The Lake.
Transect - Transect number.
Quadrat - Photoquadrat number.
Columns 4-14 (Epilithic Algal Matrix - Unknown) - These columns contain the percent cover for each benthic functional group (Epilithic Algal Matrix, Coral, Gorgonian, Sponge, Macroalgae, Other Live, Benthic Cyanobacterial Mat, Articulated Coralline Algae, Crustose Coralline Algae, Sediment, Unknown).
Columns 15-32 (Orbicella.annularis..OA. - Porites.divaricata..PD.) - Contain the percent cover of different coral species, labeled as "Genus.species..Abbreviation." The row totals for these columns sum to the total coral cover.
bites.csv metadata:
Season - Season in which the observations were made (Summer, Northern Hemisphere).
Site - Fringing Reef Sites: AC, Angel City; AQ, Aquarius; BB, Bachelor's Beach; IV, Invisibles; TL, The Lake.
Date - Date of observation in M/D/YYYY format.
Species - Scientific name of parrotfish observed (Scarus iseri, Scarus taeniopterus, Scarus vetula, Sparisoma aurofrenatum, and Sparisoma viride).
Phase - Ontogenetic phase of the parrotfish observed: initial phase (IP) or terminal phase (TP).
Num - Fish Number.
Rep - Replicate; always 1.
Behavior - Always Bite.
Substrate - Substrate bitten, same functional groups as recorded for benthic cover.
Coral - If coral was bitten, the species of coral is given here (e.g., Orbicella faveolata). If no coral was bitten, the value is None.
follow-data.csv metadata
Season - Season in which the observations were made (Summer, Northern Hemisphere).
Site - Fringing Reef Sites: AC, Angel City; AQ, Aquarius; BB, Bachelor's Beach; IV, Invisibles; TL, The Lake.
Date - Date of observation in M/D/YYYY format.
Species - Scientific name of parrotfish observed (Scarus iseri, Scarus taeniopterus, Scarus vetula, Sparisoma aurofrenatum, and Sparisoma viride).
Phase - Ontogenetic phase of the parrotfish observed: initial phase (IP) or terminal phase (TP).
Num - Fish Number.
Rep - Replicate; always 1.
Total.Time - Total time (mins) of video-recorded foraging observation (i.e., from time camera was pointed at fish to when it was taken off the fish to end the observation).
Lost.Time - Time (mins) during video-recorded foraging observation during which the focal fish was not clearly visible in the video (e.g., under a coral head for more than a second or two).
Follow.Time - Calculated as the Total.Time - Lost.Time, this is the value we used to quantify rates of foraging and as an offset in statistical models because it is the true "observation duration" (mins).
SL - The standard length (cm) of each focal fish, estimated by the observer in situ.
Funding provided by: Tatelbaum Ocean Research Fund awarded to Dr. Sophie J. McCoy*
Crossref Funder Registry ID:
Award Number:
Funding provided by: Florida State University start-up funding awarded to Dr. Sophie J. McCoy*
Crossref Funder Registry ID:
Award Number:
Funding provided by: Mote Research Assistantship from the William R. and Lenore Mote Eminent Scholar in Marine Biology Endowment at Florida State University awarded to Joshua C. Manning*
Crossref Funder Registry ID:
Award Number:
Funding provided by: American Museum of Natural History - Lerner-Gray Memorial Fund for Marine Research awarded to Joshua C. Manning*
Crossref Funder Registry ID:
Award Number: