Published January 28, 2010 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Does your preservative preserve? A comparison of the efficacy of some pitfall trap solutions in preserving the internal reproductive organs of dung beetles

  • 1. James Cook University, , Australia

Description

Eight pitfall trap preservatives, brine, saturated borax solution, propylene glycol (33%, 50%, 75%), white vinegar, 100% ethylene glycol, FAACC (Formaldehyde 4%, Acetic acid 5%, Calcium chloride 1.3%), 4% phosphate buffered formaldehyde and 96% ethanol, were compared for their ability to preserve the internal reproductive organs of the dung beetle Liatongus militaris (Laporte) (Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) for up to 28 days in the field. Relative evaporation rates of the preservatives in riparian vine thicket and low open woodland environments were also compared. 96% ethanol, FAACC and 4% phosphate buffered formaldehyde were the only solutions found to preserve all of the internal reproductive organs. Evaporation rates were lower in the vine thicket and some preservatives such as ethanol completely evaporated within seven days. 4% phosphate buffered formaldehyde is recommended as a preservative for pitfall traps left in the field for periods longer than one week. Possible ways to prevent trap interference by mammals and risks to the environment due to overspill are also discussed.

Files

ZK_article_2133.pdf

Files (1.5 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:1f8bde5e309b2e6a80d35bf8ab569ace
1.5 MB Preview Download

Linked records

Additional details

Identifiers

LSID
urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:FF8BDE5EFF9B2E6AFFD3FFF8AB56FFCE

References

  • Bosetti C, McLaughlin JK, Tarone RE, Pira E, La Vecchia C (2008) Formaldehyde and cancer risk: a quantitative review of cohort studies through 2006. Annals of Oncology 19: 29-43.
  • Brennan KEC, Majer JD, Reygaert N (1999) Determination of an Optimal Pitfall Trap Size for Sampling Spiders in a Western Australian Jarrah Forest. Journal of Insect Conservation 3: 297-307.
  • Coombs NJ, Gough AC, Primrose JN (1999) Optimisation of DNA and RNA extraction from archival formalin-fixed tissue. Nucleic Acids Research 27: e12-e16.
  • Gist CS, Crossley DA (1973) A method for quantifying pitfall trapping. Environmental Entomology 2: 951-952.
  • Greenslade P, Greenslade PJM (1971) The use of baits and preservatives in pitfall traps. Journal of the Australian Entomological Society 10: 253-260.
  • Gurdebeke S, Maelfait J-P (2002) Pitfall trapping in population genetics studies: finding the right "solution". The Journal of Arachnology 30: 255-261.
  • Hall DW (1991) The environmental hazard of ethylene glycol in insect pit-fall traps. The Coleopterists Bulletin 45: 193-194.
  • Hinton HE (1981) Biology of Insect Eggs: Volume I, Pergamon Press Ltd, U. K.
  • IARC (2006) IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. Formaldehyde, 2-butoxyethanol, and 1-tert-butoxypropan-2-ol. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer 88.
  • Jud P, Schmidt-Entling MH (2008) Fluid type, dilution, and bitter agent influence spider preservation in pitfall traps. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 129: 356-359.
  • Larsen TH, Forsyth A (2005) Trap spacing and transect design for dung beetle biodiversity studies. Biotropica 37: 322-325.
  • Luff ML (1968) Some effects of formalin on the numbers of Coleoptera caught in pitfall traps. Entomologist's Monthly Magazine 104: 115-116.
  • Luff ML (1975) Some features influencing the efficiency of pitfall traps. Oecologia 19: 345-357.
  • Newton A, Peck SB (1975) Baited Pitfall Traps for Beetles. The Coleopterists Bulletin 29: 45-46.
  • Norden BB, Webb RE, McCardle PW, White GB (2005) A new fixing technique using rice vinegar prior to mosquito dissection (Diptera: Culicidae). Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 78: 189-191.
  • Pekar S (2002) Differential effects of formaldehyde concentration and detergent on the catching efficiency of surface active arthropods by pitfall traps. Pedobiologia 46: 539-547.
  • Perner J, Schueler S (2004) Estimating the density of ground-dwelling arthropods with pitfall traps using a nested-cross array. Journal of Animal Ecology 73: 469-477.
  • Richards OW, Davies RG (1977) Imms' general texbook of entomology, Chapman & Hall, London.
  • Sasakawa K (2007) Effects of pitfall trap preservatives on specimen condition in carabid beetles. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 125: 321-324.
  • Schmidt MH, Clough Y, Schutz W, Westphalen A, Tscharntke T (2006) Capture efficiency and preservation attributes of different fluids in pitfall traps. The Journal of Arachnology 34: 159-162.
  • Stork NE, Paarmann W (1992) Reproductive seasonality of the ground and tiger beetle (Coleoptera: Carabidae, Cicindelidae) fauna in North Sulawesi (Indonesia). Studies on the Neotropical Fauna and Environment 27: 101-115.
  • Thomas DB (2008) Nontoxic antifreeze for insect traps. Entomological News 119: 361-365.
  • Topping CJ, Sunderland KD (1992) Limitations to the use of pitfall traps in ecological studies exemplified by a study of spiders in a field of winter wheat Journal of Applied Ecology 29: 485-491.
  • Tyndale-Biscoe M (1978) Physiological age-grading in females of the dung beetle Euoniticellus intermedius (Reiche) (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Bulletin of Entomological Research 68: 207-217.
  • Tyndale-Biscoe M (1984) Age-grading methods in adult insects: a review. Bulletin of Entomological Research 74: 341-377.
  • Tyndale-Biscoe M, Walker J (1992) The phenology of the native dung beetle Onthophagus australis (Guerin) (Coleoptera: Scarabaeinae) in South-eastern Australia. Australian Journal of Zoology 40: 303-311.
  • Tyndale-Biscoe M, Watson JAL (1977) Extra-ovariolar egg resorption in a dung beetle, Euoniticellus intermedius. Journal of Insect Physiology 23: 1163-1167.
  • van Dijk TS, den Boer PJ (1992) The life histories and population dynamics of two carabid species on a Dutch heathland Oecologia 90: 340-352.
  • Ward DF, New TR, Yen AL (2001) Effects of pitfall trap spacing on the abundance, richness and composotion of invertebrate catches. Journal of Insect Conservation 5: 47-53.
  • Weeks RD, McIntyre NE (1997) A comparison of live versus kill pitfall trapping techniques using various killing agents. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 82: 267-273.