Published November 24, 2021 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Non-Standard Errors

  • 1. Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Tinbergen Institute
  • 2. Stockholm School of Economics
  • 3. University of Innsbruck
  • 4. Aalto University
  • 5. Radboud University, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
  • 1. HEC Paris
  • 2. Université d'Orléans
  • 3. CNRS

Description

In statistics, samples are drawn from a population in a data-generating process (DGP). Standard errors measure the uncertainty in sample estimates of population parameters. In science, evidence is generated to test hypotheses in an evidence-generating process (EGP). We claim that EGP variation across researchers adds uncertainty: non-standard errors. To study them, we let 164 teams test six hypotheses on the same sample. We find that non-standard errors are sizeable, on par with standard errors. Their size (i) co-varies only weakly with team merits, reproducibility, or peer rating, (ii) declines significantly after peer-feedback, and (iii) is underestimated by participants.


Online appendix available at: https://bit.ly/3DIQKrB.

Files

Non-Standard Errors (SSRN-id3961574).pdf

Files (1.3 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:11222ffa86295ee9f1f99f544ef309eb
1.3 MB Preview Download