Generalizability of randomized controlled trials in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction
Creators
- 1. Institute for Clinical Research; University Medical Center Utrecht
- 2. Bayer AG
- 3. University Medical Center Utrecht
- 4. Karolinska Institutet
- 5. Erasmus MC University Medical Centre
- 6. Maastricht University Medical Center
- 7. Institut de Recherches Internationales SERVIER (I.R.I.S.)
- 8. Vifor Pharma
- 9. Karolinksa Institutet
- 10. Cronin Pharma Consulting
Description
Abstract
Background
Heart failure (HF) trials have stringent inclusion and exclusion criteria, but limited data exist regarding generalizability of trials. We compared patient characteristics and outcomes between patients with HF and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) in trials and observational registries.
Methods and Results
Individual patient data for 16 922 patients from five randomized clinical trials and 46 914 patients from two HF registries were included. The registry patients were categorized into trial-eligible and non-eligible groups using the most commonly used inclusion and exclusion criteria. A total of 26 104 (56%) registry patients fulfilled the eligibility criteria. Unadjusted all-cause mortality rates at 1 year were lowest in the trial population (7%), followed by trial-eligible patients (12%) and trial-non-eligible registry patients (26%). After adjustment for age and sex, all-cause mortality rates were similar between trial participants and trial-eligible registry patients [standardized mortality ratio (SMR) 0.97; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.92–1.03] but cardiovascular mortality was higher in trial participants (SMR 1.19; 1.12–1.27). After full case-mix adjustment, the SMR for cardiovascular mortality remained higher in the trials at 1.28 (1.20–1.37) compared to RCT-eligible registry patients.
Conclusion
In contemporary HF registries, over half of HFrEF patients would have been eligible for trial enrolment. Crude clinical event rates were lower in the trials, but, after adjustment for case-mix, trial participants had similar rates of survival as registries. Despite this, they had about 30% higher cardiovascular mortality rates. Age and sex were the main drivers of differences in clinical outcomes between HF trials and observational HF registries.
Files
qcab070.pdf
Files
(1.3 MB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
md5:cbcf0d39392c7b3da6eda55fb777a5e9
|
1.3 MB | Preview Download |