Published December 31, 2006 | Version v1
Taxonomic treatment Open

Sperchon insignis Walter 1906

Creators

Description

Sperchon insignis (Walter, 1906)

Records (Table 2): Benthos samples at three spring sites in Gutland, 5 individuals. E7 22 larvae, parasitic on dixids. Attribution to adults by co­occurrence. Rearing of larvae from female adults failed.

Description (n = 5; unless otherwise indicated): Since all larvae were in a poor condition and had engorged to different extents, an illustration of the larval morphology was not possible and not all characters could be measured. Idiosoma moderately ovate; in some specimens, a transverse­folded field at posterior dorsal idiosoma was visible, similar to that in S. setiger (Figs. 17, 18). Size of idiosoma strongly variable depending on engorgement. Length of five engorged specimens: 219–252 (236), width 198–246 (218).

Dorsal idiosoma: Dp relatively small and finely striated. Anterior margin nearly straight or slightly concave, posteriorly slightly confined. Length/width Dp (n=1) 108/68, Mp2­Amdp (n=2) 40–46 (43), Mp1­Mp1 43–47 (45), Mp2­Mp 2 30–32 (31), Lp1­Lp1 38– 42 (40), Lp2­Lp2 50–50 (50), Mp1­Lp 1 12–12 (12), Mp2­Lp 2 14–17 (16), Mp1­Mp 2 28– 32 (30), Lp1­Lp 2 25–31 (28), Mp1 (n=1) 36, Mp2 38, Lp1 28, Lp2 52.

Ventral idiosoma: Length/width CX­I (n=5) 71–77 (74)/37–41 (39), CX­II 64–72 (67)/ 42–47 (44), CX­III 78–83 (80)/64–70 (66), the coxal plates were sculptured in some specimens with a characteristic pattern, similar to that of S. longissimus (see Fig. 22), urstigma slightly elongated, maximum diameter 12–13 (13), C1­C2 44–46 (45), C1­ posterior margin of CX­I 19–23 (21), C1­Mmcp 19–23 (21), C4­Pmcp 64–72 (68), C1 54– 59 (56), C2 58–64 (62), C4 (n=2) 58–66 (62), length/width Expp (n=5) 14–17 (15)/16–19 (17), E1­ E 1 6 –10 (8), E2­ E 2 10 –13 (12).

Gnathosoma: Length/height chelicera (n=2) 72–72 (72)/ 22–22 (22), length chela (n=1) 19, length/height P2 41/34, length/height P 3 25/29, claw 20.

Legs (n=5): All leg segments with the exception of first segments clearly striated.

Leg I: Total length 269–288 (279), length/height I­L1 32–37 (35)/25–28 (26), I­L2 42–47 (45)/26–29 (28), I­L3 54–58 (56)/24–28 (26), I­L4 61–62 (61)/ 24–24 (24), I­L5 79–84 (81)/ 22–22 (22).

Leg II: Total length 295–312 (303), length/height II­L1 41–42 (42)/25–26 (26), II­L2 44–48 (46)/26–28 (27), II­L3 58–61 (60)/24–26 (25), II­L4 68–72 (70)/22–24 (23), II­L5 84–89 (86)/20–22 (21).

Leg III: Total length 349–374 (361), length/height III­L1 50–56 (53)/24–26 (25), III­ L2 52–60 (55)/24–28 (26), III­L3 70–74 (72)/ 20–24 (23), III­L4 85–89 (87)/22–22 (22), III­L5 92–95 (93)/19–20 (20).

Diagnostic characters of larvae: Lack of C3 and short legs. In general, the larval morphology of S. insignis is similar to that of S. setiger (e.g. related to the lack of seta C3, the field of the folded integument located at the distal dorsal idiosoma). However, some morphological differences enable a separation between the two species. All legs and Dp in S. insignis are longer than those in S. setiger.

Remarks: The larva of Sperchon insignis was previously unknown. The species was formerly placed as a synonym or as a subspecies of S. setiger (e.g. Viets & Viets 1959; Viets 1987). Our morphological data of the larvae support recognition of S. insignis as a separate species (Gerecke, pers. com.). Since the state of the studied animals did not allow figures to be drawn, the description above is incomplete. Differences in size of legs, sclerotized structures of the idiosoma and setae are often found in sibling species exhibiting parasitic and non­parasitic life­history traits (Smith 1998). A more thorough investigation of larval morphology of egg larvae from different populations of S. setiger and S. insignis should show to which extent larval morphology in S. setiger from different habitats is stable.

Notes

Published as part of Martin, Peter, 2006, On the morphology and classification of larval water mites (Hydrachnidia, Acari) from springs in Luxembourg, pp. 1-44 in Zootaxa 1138 on pages 13-14, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.172007

Files

Files (4.5 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:73476c53b1ff8ebe191d89431ab0a233
4.5 kB Download

System files (14.6 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:fddd2f10727ed958b6da933e725c4b55
14.6 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

Biodiversity

Family
Sperchonidae
Genus
Sperchon
Kingdom
Animalia
Order
Trombidiformes
Phylum
Arthropoda
Scientific name authorship
Walter
Species
insignis
Taxon rank
species
Taxonomic concept label
Sperchon insignis Walter, 1906 sec. Martin, 2006

References

  • Viets, K., & Viets, K. O. (1959) Wassermilben, Hydracarina. In: Brohmer, P., Ehrmann, P. & Ulmer, G. (E d s.) Die Tierwelt Mitteleuropas. Quelle & Meyer, Leipzig, pp. 1 - 44.
  • Viets, K. O. (1987) Die Milben des Sußwassers (Hydrachnellae und Halacaridae [part.], Acari). II. Katalog. Sonderbande des Naturwissenschaftlichen Vereins in Hamburg, 8, 1 - 1012.
  • Smith, B. P. (1998) Loss of larval parasitism in parasitengonine mites. Experimental & Applied Acarology, 22, 187 - 200.