Published October 18, 2021 | Version v1
Journal article Restricted

Calling phenology of anurans in a tropical rainforest in South Mexico: testing predictive models

Description

Rosa, Diana Laura Fuentes-de la, Ochoa-Ocho, Leticia Margarita, Canavero, Andrés (2021): Calling phenology of anurans in a tropical rainforest in South Mexico: testing predictive models. Journal of Natural History 55 (31-32), No. 31-32: 1941-1955, DOI: 10.1080/00222933.2021.1975838

Files

Restricted

The record is publicly accessible, but files are restricted to users with access.

Linked records

Additional details

Identifiers

LSID
urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:FF947500DA3DFFE7FFB2136E237BFFC2

References

  • Agostino PV, Lusk NA, Meck WH, Golombek DA, Peryer G. 2020. Daily and seasonal fluctuation in Tawny Owl vocalization timing. PLoS One. 15:1-12. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0231591.
  • Aichinger M. 1987. Annual activity patterns of anurans in a seasonal neotropical environment. Oecologia. 71:583-592. doi:10.1007/BF00379302.
  • Berry PY. 1964. The breeding patterns of seven species of Singapore. J Anim Ecol. 33:227-243. doi:10.2307/2629.
  • Bertoluci J, Rodrigues MT. 2002. Seasonal patterns of breeding activity of Atlantic Rainforest anurans at Boraceia, Southeastern Brazil. Amphib Reptil. 23:161-167. doi:10.1163/ 156853802760061804.
  • Boeuf G, Le Bail PY. 1999. Does light have an influence on fish growth? Aquaculture. 177:129-152. doi:10.1016/S0044-8486(99)00074-5.
  • Both C, Kaefer IL, Santos TG, Cechin STZ. 2008. An austral anuran assemblage in the Neotropics: seasonal occurrence correlated with photoperiod. J Nat Hist. 42:205-222. doi:10.1080/ 00222930701847923.
  • Bradshaw WE, Holzapfel CM. 2007. Evolution of animal photoperiodism. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 38:1-25. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.37.091305.110115.
  • Burnham KP, Anderson DR. 2002. Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. 2nd ed. New York (NY): Springer-Verlag, editor.
  • Canavero A, Arim M. 2009. Clues supporting photoperiod as the main determinant of seasonal variation in amphibian activity. J Nat Hist. 43:2975-2984. doi:10.1080/00222930903377539.
  • Canavero A, Arim M, Brazeiro A. 2009. Geographic variations of seasonality and coexistence in communities: the role of diversity and climate. Austral Ecol. 34:741-750.
  • Canavero A, Arim M, Naya DE, Camargo A, Da Rosa I, Maneyro R. 2008. Calling activity patterns in an anuran assemblage: the role of seasonal trends and weather determinants. North West J Zool. 4:29-41.
  • Canavero A, Arim M, Perez F, Jaksic FM, Marquet PA. 2018. A metabolic view of amphibian local community structure: the role of activation energy. Ecography (Cop). 41:388-400. doi:10.1111/ ecog.02336.
  • CONANP. 2006. Programa De Conservacion Y Manejo. Area de Proteccion De Flora Y Fauna Naha. Mexico City: CONANP, editor.
  • Crump M. 1974. Reproductive strategies in a Tropical Anuran community. Misc Publ Kansas Univ. 61:1-68. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15003161%5Cnhttp://cid.oxfordjournals.org/ lookup/doi/10.1093/cid/cir991%5Cnhttp://www.scielo.cl/pdf/udecada/v15n26/art06.pdf% 5Cnhttp://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-84861150233&partnerID=tZOtx3y1 .
  • Da Silva Ximenez S, Tozetti AM. 2015. Seasonality in anuran activity and calling season in a Brazilian subtemperate wetland. Zool Stud. 54. doi:10.1186/s40555-015-0125-8.
  • Danks HV. 2003. Studying insect photoperiodism and rhythmicity: components, approaches and lessons. Eur J Entomol. 100:209-221. doi:10.14411/eje.2003.036.
  • Dawson A, King VM, Bentley GE, Ball GF. 2001. Photoperiodic control of seasonality in birds. J Biol Rhythms. 16:365-380. doi:10.1177/074873001129002079.
  • Donnelly MA, Guyer C. 1994. Patterns of reproduction and habitat use in an assemblage of Neotropical hylid frogs. Oecologia. 98:291-302. doi:10.1007/BF00324217.
  • Emerson KJ, Bradshaw WE, Holzapfel CM. 2008. Concordance of the circadian clock with the environment is necessary to maximize fitness in natural populations. Evolution (NY). 62:979-983. doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00324.x.
  • Figueroa-Huitron R, Ochoa-Ochoa LM, Sanchez-Ochoa D. 2020. Calling phenology of four anurans in tropical Mexico. Rev Mex Biodivers. 91(1).
  • Forrest J, Miller-Rushing AJ. 2010. Toward a synthetic understanding of the role of phenology in ecology and evolution. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci. 365:3101-3112. doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0145.
  • Frost DR. 2021. Amphibian species of the world: an online reference. Version 6.1. New York (USA) [Internet]: Am Museum Nat Hist. https://amphibiansoftheworld.amnh.org/
  • Garcia A, Cabrera-Reyes A. 2008. Seasonality and structure of vegetation in the amphibian and reptile community of Chamela, Jalisco, Mexico (Estacionalidad y estructura de la vegetacion en la comunidad de anfibios y reptiles de Chamela, Jalisco, Mexico). Acta Zoologica Mex. 24:91-115.
  • Garcia E. 2004. Modificaciones al sistema de clasificacion climatica de Koppen. Quinta Edi. Mexico City: Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Instituto de Geografia.
  • Guerra V, de Queiroz Costa N, Llusia D, Marquez R, Bastos RP. 2020. Nightly patterns of calling activity in anuran assemblages of the Cerrado, Brazil. Community Ecol. 21:33-42. doi:10.1007/ s42974-020-00013-8.
  • Hartel T, Sas I. 2007. The reproductive dynamics of temperate amphibians: a review. North West J Zool. 3:127-145.
  • Helm B, Lincoln GA. 2017. Biological timekeeping: clocks, rhythms and behaviour. In: Vinod Kumar, editor. Biol timekeep clocks, Rhythm Behav. New Delhi, India: Springer; p. 545-567.
  • Hernandez-Nava J. 2003. Areas de proteccion de flora y fauna de Naha y Metzabok. Chiapas (Mexico): Ficha Informativa de los Humedales de Ramsar. Mexico city.
  • Kopp K, Eterovick PC. 2006. Factors influencing spatial and temporal structure of frog assemblages at ponds in southeastern Brazil. J Nat Hist. 40:1813-1830. doi:10.1080/00222930601017403.
  • Levin SA. 1992. The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology. 73:1943-1967. doi:10.2307/ 1941447.
  • Llusia D, Marquez R, Beltran JF, Moreira C, do Amaral JP. 2013. Environmental and social determinants of anuran lekking behavior: intraspecific variation in populations at thermal extremes. Behav Ecol Sociobiol. 67:493-511. doi:10.1007/s00265-012-1469-2.
  • Lund U, Agostinelli C, Arai H, Gagliardi A, Garcia Portuges E, Giunchi D, Irisson J-O, Pocermnich M, Rotolo F. 2017. Package "circular": circular statistics. R Packag [Internet]. p. 138. https://www. topsoe.com/processes/sng .
  • Marquez R, LLusia D, Beltran JF, Amaral JPDO, Bowker RG. 2007. Anurans, the group of terrestrial vertebrates most vulnerable to climate change: a case study with acoustic monitoring in the Iberian Peninsula. Comput bioacoustics Assess biodiversity Proc Int Expert Meet IT-based Detect bioacoustical patterns; Isle of Vilm, Germany. Vol. 234. p. 43-51.
  • Navas CA. 1996. The effect of temperature on the vocal activity of tropical anurans: a comparison of high and low-elevation species. J Herpetol. 30:488-497. doi:10.2307/1565691.
  • Nylin S, Gotthard K. 1998. Plasticity in life-history traits. Annu Rev Entomol. 43:63-83. doi:10.1146/ annurev.ento.43.1.63.
  • Ochoa-Ochoa LM, Whittaker RJ. 2014. Spatial and temporal variation in amphibian metacommunity structure in Chiapas, Mexico. J Trop Ecol. 30:537-549. doi:10.1017/S0266467414000388.
  • Ospina OE, Villanueva-Rivera LJ, Corrada-Bravo CJ, Mitchell Aide T. 2013. Variable response of anuran calling activity to daily precipitation and temperature: implications for climate change. Ecosphere. 4:1-12. doi:10.1890/ES12-00258.1.
  • Perez-Granados C, Schuchmann KL, Ganchev T, Strussmann C, Dorado-Rodrigues TF, Tissiani de Oliveira AS, De Deus FF, Marques MI. 2019a. Elucidating the diel and seasonal calling behaviour of Elachistocleis matogrosso (Anura: Microhylidae). J Nat Hist. 53:2699-2710. doi:10.1080/ 00222933.2020.1728409.
  • Perez-Granados C, Schuchmann KL, Ramoni-Perazzi P, Marques MI. 2019b. Calling behaviour of Elachistocleis matogrosso (Anura, Microhylidae) is associated with habitat temperature and rainfall. Bioacoustics. 29:670-683. doi:10.1080/09524622.2019.1658642.
  • Rastogi RK, Pinelli C, Polese G, D'Aniello B, Chieffi-Baccari G. 2011. Hormones and reproductive cycles in Anuran Amphibians. Horm Reprod Vertebr - Vol 2. 2:171-186.
  • Saenz D, Fitzgerald LA, Baum KA, Conner RN. 2006. Abiotic correlates of anuran calling phenology: the importance of rain, temperature, and season. Herpetol Monogr. 20:64-82. doi:10.1655/0733- 1347(2007)20[64:ACOACP]2.0.CO;2.
  • Sakamoto Y, Ishiguro M, Kitagawa G. 1987. Akaike information criterion statistics. [place unknown]. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
  • Schalk CM, Saenz D. 2016. Environmental drivers of anuran calling phenology in a seasonal Neotropical ecosystem. Austral Ecol. 41:16-27. doi:10.1111/aec.12281.
  • Schneider DC. 2001. The rise of the concept of scale in ecology. Bioscience. 51:545-553. doi:10.1641/ 0006-3568(2001)051[0545:TROTCO]2.0.CO;2.
  • Schwartz MD. 2003. Phenology in agriculture and horticulture. [place unknown]. http://link.springer. com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-94-007-6925-0.pdf .
  • Steen DA, McClure CJW, Graham SP. 2013. Relative influence of weather and season on anuran calling activity. Can J Zool. 91:462-467. doi:10.1139/cjz-2012-0266.
  • Tang Y-Z, Zhuang L-Z, Wang Z-W. 2001. Advertisement calls and their relation to reproductive cycles in Gekko gecko (Reptilia, Lacertilia). Copeia. 1:248-253. doi:10.1643/0045-8511(2001)001[0248: ACATRT]2.0.CO;2.
  • Villanueva-Rivera LJ. 2007. Digital recorders increase detection of Eleutherodactylus frogs. Herpetol Rev. 38:59-63.
  • Visser ME, Caro SP, Van Oers K, Schaper SV, Helm B. 2010. Phenology, seasonal timing and circannual rhythms: towards a unified framework. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci. 365:3113-3127. doi:10.1098/ rstb.2010.0111.
  • Wagenmakers E-J, Farrell S. 2004. AIC model selection using Akaike weights. Psychon Bull Rev. 11:192-196. doi:10.3758/BF03206482.
  • Walther G-R, Post E, Convey P, Menzel A, Parmesan C, Beebee TJC, Fromentin J-M, Hoegh-Guldberg O, Bairlein F. 2002. Ecological responses to recent climate change. Nature. 416:389-395. http:// www.nature.com/doifinder/10.1038/416389a .
  • Weir LA, Royle JA, Nanjappa P, Jung RE. 2005. Modeling anuran detection and site occupancy on North American Amphibian monitoring program (NAAMP) routes in Maryland. J Herpetol. 39:627-639.
  • Wells KD. 2007. The ecology and behavior of Amphibians. Chicago: University Chicago Press.
  • Wells KD, Schwartz JJ. 2007. The behavioral ecology of anuran communication. In: Narins PM, Feng AS, Fay RR, Popper AN, editors. Hear sound Commun Amphib. New York (NY): Springer; p. 44-86.
  • Willacy RJ, Mahony M, Newell DA. 2015. If a frog calls in the forest: bioacoustic monitoring reveals the breeding phenology of the endangered Richmond Range mountain frog (Philoria richmondensis). Austral Ecol. 40:625-633. doi:10.1111/aec.12228.