Published December 31, 2009 | Version v1
Taxonomic treatment Open

Hypocreadium

Description

Key to the species and forms of Hypocreadium

1 Body oval; width less than 70% of length; ovary more or less pretesticular............................................................... 2

- Body closer to circular or wider than long; ovary inter- or post-testicular................................................................. 3

2 Genital pore anterior to intestinal bifurcation; uterus reaches posteriorly to ovary; sucker-ratio 1:1.22 ....................... ...................................................................................................................................... H. symmetrorchis Ozaki, 1936

- Genital pore posterior to intestinal bifurcation; uterus pre-ovarian; sucker-ratio 1:0.51–0.89 ...................................... ..................................................................................................................... H. biminensis (Sogandares-Bernal, 1959)

3 Anterior notch distinct ................................................................................................................................................ 4

- Anterior notch absent or indistinct ............................................................................................................................... 6

4 Vitelline fields in forebody confluent or nearly so; caecal endings directed distinctly anteriorly ................................. ................................................................................................................................... H. toombo Bray & Justine, 2006

- Vitelline fields distinctly separated in forebody; caecal endings usually directed posteriorly, occasionally transverse or slightly anterior ........................................................................................................................................................ 5

5 Uterus always pre-ovarian; genital pore always at bifurcal level; ovary intertesticular................................................. ....................................................................................................................................... H. cavum Bray & Cribb, 1996

- Uterus may reach para- or post-testicularly; genital pore variable, between pharynx and bifurcal level; ovary inter to post-testicular ............................................................................ H. patellare Yamaguti, 1938 (various forms, see text)

6 Body pyriform.............................................................................................................................................................. 7

- Body oval to circular.................................................................................................................................................... 8

7 Narrow gap between vitelline fields and body margins, fields confluent anteriorly...................................................... ........................................................................................................................ H. lactophrysi (Nahhas & Cable, 1964)

- Wide gap between vitelline fields and body margins, fields separated anteriorly ............................. H. picasso n. sp.

8 Vitelline fields confluent in forebody .......................................................................................................................... 9

- Vitelline fields separated in forebody ......................................................................................................................... 10

9 Body oval, width 84–91% of length; vitelline fields confluent in hindbody; uterus pre-ovarian .................................. .................................................................................................................................. H. galapagoensis (Manter, 1945)

- Body probably circular (edges folded); vitelline fields separated in hindbody; uterus para-ovarian ............................ .......................................................................................................................................... H. spinosum (Manter, 1940)

10 Vitelline fields widely separated in hindbody................................................................................................................. H. lamelliforme (Linton, 1907) (this species is poorly known and the entry in this key is based on Fig. 77 in Linton (1907) from the grey triggerfish, Balistes capriscus Gmelin (as B. carolinensis Gmelin) – the first host listed and considered type-host here; fig. 78 represents Dermadena lactophrysi Manter (see Manter, 1945); Fig. 76 also probably represents a Dermadena sp.)

- Vitelline fields confluent in hindbody ........................................................................................................................ 11

11 Caecal ends oriented anteriorly, uterus preovarian.......................................................... H. indicum (Madhavi, 1972)

- Caecal ends oriented posteriorly, uterus postovarian ................................................................................................. 12

12 Body broadly oval, width, 126–149% of body-length ...................................... H. grandiquamis Bray & Cribb, 1996

- Body more nearly circular, width <114% of body-length .......................................................................................... 13

13 Caecal endings transversely oriented; ovary more or less lobed; eggs 51–56 × 32–44 ................................................. .................................................................................................................................. H. scaphosomum (Manter, 1940)

- Caecal endings posteriorly oriented; ovary entire; eggs>64 × 40 ............................................................................. 14

14 Vitelline fields confluent in wide band in hindbody............................................................ H. balistes (Nagaty, 1942)

- Vitelline fields slightly separated in hindbody .................................. H. myohelicatum Bravo-Hollis & Manter, 1957

Notes

Published as part of Bray, Rodney A., Cribb, Thomas H. & Justine, Jean-Lou, 2009, New observations on the genus Hypocreadium Ozaki, 1936 (Digenea: Lepocreadiidae) in the Indo-West Pacific region, including the description of one new species, pp. 22-40 in Zootaxa 2110 on pages 38-39, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.187863

Files

Files (6.8 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:ef996ce9f5f8cb72aa6be7dd2659b985
6.8 kB Download

System files (25.3 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:e40971865d290c46ff12b5c702fa9c30
25.3 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

Biodiversity

References

  • Ozaki, Y. (1936) Two new genera of the trematode family, Allocreadiidae. Zoological Magazine, 48, 513 - 518.
  • Sogandares-Bernal, F. (1959) Digenetic trematodes of marine fishes from the Gulf of Panama and Bimini, British West Indies. Tulane Studies in Zoology, 7, 69 - 117.
  • Bray, R. A. & Justine, J. - L. (2006) Hypocreadium toombo n. sp. (Digenea: Lepocreadiidae) in the yellow-spotted triggerfish Pseudobalistes fuscus (Perciformes: Balistidae) and additional lepocreadiids parasitizing fishes from the waters off New Caledonia. Zootaxa, 1326, 37 - 44.
  • Bray, R. A. & Cribb, T. H. (1996) The Australian species of Lobatocreadium Madhavi, 1972, Hypocreadium Ozaki, 1936 and Dermadena Manter, 1945 (Digenea: Lepocreadiidae), parasites of marine tetraodontiform fishes. Systematic Parasitology, 35, 217 - 236.
  • Yamaguti, S. (1938) Studies on the helminth fauna of Japan. Part 21. Trematodes of fishes, IV. Satyu Yamaguti, Kyoto, 139 pp.
  • Nahhas, F. M. & Cable, R. M. (1964) Digenetic and aspidogastrid trematodes from marine fishes of Curacao and Jamaica. Tulane Studies in Zoology, 11, 169 - 228.
  • Manter, H. W. (1945) Dermadena lactophrysi n. gen., n. sp. (Trematoda: Lepocreadiidae) and consideration of the related genus Pseudocreadium. Journal of Parasitology, 31, 411 - 417.
  • Manter, H. W. (1940) Digenetic trematodes of fishes from the Galapagos Islands and the neighboring Pacific. Allan Hancock Pacific Expeditions, 2, 325 - 497.
  • Linton, E. (1907) Notes on parasites of Bermuda fishes. Proceedings of the United States National Museum, 33, 85 - 126.
  • Madhavi, R. (1972) Digenetic trematodes from marine fishes of Waltair Coast, Bay of Bengal. I. Family Lepocreadiidae. Journal of Parasitology, 58, 217 - 225.
  • Nagaty, H. F. (1942) Trematodes of fishes from the Red Sea. Part 3. On seven new allocreadiid species. Publications of the Marine Biological Station Ghardaqa (Red Sea), 4, 1 - 27.
  • Bravo-Hollis, M. & Manter, H. W. (1957) Trematodes of marine fishes of Mexican waters. X. Thirteen Digenea including nine new species and two new genera from Pacific coast. Proceedings of the Helminthological Society of Washington, 24, 35 - 48.