Published December 31, 2014 | Version v1
Taxonomic treatment Open

Psorodonotus specularis subsp. inermis Ramme 1951, stat. rev.

Description

Psorodonotus specularis inermis Ramme, 1951, stat. rev.

(Figs 1, 19, 33, 47, 48, 62, 76, 90, 104, 118, 132, 133, 134 B, 136, 137A, 156, 157; Tables 1–4)

Psorodonotus specularis inermis Ramme 1951: 263.

Psorodonotus specularis (Fischer von Waldheim); Stolyarov 1983:18 (including P. s. inermis Ramme as a subspecies).

Type specimen information. Holotype, male, Caucasus, Georgia, Gudaur; Paratypes, 3 males, 4 females from the same locality; 2 males, 3 females—Kasbek (Kazbegi), 1800–2000 m.

Material examined. See Table 1. Additionally: GEORGIA: 1M, 2M (paratypes), 5F (paratypes), Kaukasus, Gudaur, 2100m. 23.9.1927 (leg. Ramme) (MfN); 1M, Gudaur, V. Kavkaz, Tiflis, 8000 ft, 9.1912 (NHM); 1F, Gudaur, prov. Tiflis, 25.8.1915, Mus. Caucas. 94–15 (leg. B. Uvarov) (NHM); 1M, 2F (paratypes), Kaukasus, am Kazbek, 1800–2200 m, 24.9.1927 (leg. Ramme) (MfN).

Remarks. P. specularis inermis differs from the nominate subspecies by the short song-phrase duration and the hind margin of male anal tergite with a narrow incision and two large rounded processes (it is almost truncate in Psorodonotus specularis specularis). The diagnostic characters of P. specularis inermis indicated by Ramme (1951) are also observed in a population from the Western Greater Caucasus (GeorgiaMestia), including the shorter and less widened metazona of pronotum (compare Figs 18, 19 with 13–17), wider male subgenital plate with slender styli (compare Figs 89, 90 with 84–88) and unarmed ventral side of the hind femur. However, the GeorgiaMestia population differs from the typical P. s. inermis by the truncated hind edge of male anal tergite, while being bilobate in the GeorgiaKitochi population (compare Fig. 61 with 62) and by much deeper excision of the female subgenital plate (compare Fig. 131 with 132). Unfortunately, we do not dispose with song recordings of specimens from GeorgiaMestia.

Distribution. Known from the central main ridge of the Greater Caucasus Mountains. Its distribution to the west may border the range of Psorodonotus inflatus. Yet, we failed in revealing the taxonomic status of the population collected in Mestia (Georgia), near the suspected type locality of P. inflatus. The GeorgiaMestia population showed intermediate characters between P. specularis specularis and P. specularis inermis.

Notes

Published as part of Kaya, Sarp, Chobanov, Dragan & Çiplak, Battal, 2014, Review of Psorodonotus Specularis Group (Orthoptera, Tettigoniidae, Tettigoniinae): two new species from North-east Anatolia, pp. 367-400 in Zootaxa 3895 (3) on page 388, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3895.3.3, http://zenodo.org/record/252840

Files

Files (2.9 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:027791e2b238206e16648d5ba6298cc6
2.9 kB Download

System files (26.3 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:858e5b9ab28cf64c7e036597ab1dadc4
26.3 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

Biodiversity

Family
Tettigoniidae
Genus
Psorodonotus
Kingdom
Animalia
Order
Orthoptera
Phylum
Arthropoda
Scientific name authorship
Ramme
Species
inermis
Taxonomic status
stat. nov.
Taxon rank
subSpecies

References

  • Ramme, W. (1951) Zur systematik, faunistik und biologie der Orthopteren von Sudost Europa und Vorderasien. Mitteilungen aus dem Zoologischen Museum in Berlin, 27, 1 - 421.
  • Stolyarov, M. V. (1983) Taxonomic remarks on some Orthoptera of the Caucasus. Vestnik Zoologii, 3, 15 - 21.