Published July 31, 2011 | Version v1
Journal article Restricted

Vicariance and convergence in Magellanic and New Zealand long-looped brachiopod clades (Pan-Brachiopoda: Terebratelloidea)

Description

Cohen, Bernard L., Bitner, Maria A., Harper, Elizabeth M., Lee, Daphne E., Mutschke, Erika, Sellanes, Javier (2011): Vicariance and convergence in Magellanic and New Zealand long-looped brachiopod clades (Pan-Brachiopoda: Terebratelloidea). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 162 (3): 631-645, DOI: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2010.00682.x, URL: https://academic.oup.com/zoolinnean/article-lookup/doi/10.1111/j.1096-3642.2010.00682.x

Files

Restricted

The record is publicly accessible, but files are restricted to users with access.

Linked records

Additional details

Identifiers

LSID
urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:7A112619FF82FFBC6B07FFEF423CFF8D

References

  • Aldridge AE. 1981. Intraspecific variation of shape and size in subtidal populations of two Recent New Zealand articulate brachiopods. New Zealand Journal of Zoology 8: 169-174.
  • Alexander RR. 1990. Mechanical strength of shells of selected extant articulate brachiopods: implications for Palaeozoic morphological trends. Historical Biology 3: 169- 188.
  • Allan RS. 1939. Studies on the recent and tertiary brachiopoda of Australia and New Zealand. Part 1. Canterbury Museum, Records 4: 231-248.
  • Anderson EJ, MacGillivray PS, deMont ME. 1997. Scallop shells exhibit optimization of riblet dimensions for drag reduction. Biological Bulletin 192: 341-344.
  • Arendt J, Reznick D. 2007. Convergence and parallelism reconsidered: what have we learned about the genetics of adaptation? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 23: 26-32.
  • Baguna J, Martinez P, Paps J, Riutort M. 2008. Back in time: a new systematic proposal for the Bilateria. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B 363: 1481- 1491.
  • Benson DA, Karsch-Mizrachi I, Lipman DL, Ostell J, Sayers EW. 2009. GenBank. Nucleic Acids Research 37 (Supplement 1): D26-D31.
  • Bitner MA, Cohen BL, Long SL, Richer de Forges B, Saito M. 2008. (for 2007). Gyrothyris williamsi sp. nov. and inter-relationships of some taxa from waters around New Zealand and the southern oceans (Rhynchonelliformea: Terebratelloidea). Earth and Environmental Sciences Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 98: 425-435.
  • Brey T, Peck LS, Gutt J, Hain S, Arntz WE. 1995. Population dynamics of Magellania fragilis, a brachiopod dominating a mixed-bottom macrobenthic assemblage on the Antarctic shelf. Journal of the Marine Biological Association, UK 75: 857-869.
  • Carter RM. 1967. On the biology and palaeontology of some predators of bivalved Mollusca. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 4: 29-65.
  • Castresana J. 2000. Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Molecular Biology and Evolution 17: 540-552.
  • Chenna R, Sugawara H, Koike T, Lopez R, Gibson TJ, Higgins DG, Thompson JD. 2003. Multiple sequence alignment with the Clustal series of programs. Nucleic Acids Research 31: 3497-3500.
  • Cohen BL. 2001a. Advances in molecular studies. In: Brunton CHC, Cocks R, Long SL, eds. Brachiopods past and present. London: Taylor & Francis, 119-120.
  • Cohen BL. 2001b. Brachiopod molecular phylogeny advances. In: Brunton CHC, Cocks R, Long SL, eds. Brachiopods past and present. London: Taylor & Francis, 121-128.
  • Cohen BL. 2007. The brachiopod genome. In: Selden PA, ed. Treatise on invertebrate paleontology. Part H6 (supplement), Brachiopoda (revised). Lawrence, KS: Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, 2356-2372.
  • Cohen BL, Gawthrop AB, Cavalier-Smith T. 1998. Molecular phylogeny of brachiopods and phoronids based on nuclear-encoded small subunit ribosomal RNA gene sequences. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B 353: 2039-2061.
  • Cohen BL, Weydmann A. 2005. Molecular evidence that phoronids are a subtaxon of brachiopods (Brachiopoda: Phoronata) and that genetic divergence of metazoan phyla began long before the Early Cambrian. Organisms, Diversity & Evolution 5: 253-273.
  • Cooper GA. 1972. Homeomorphy in recent deep-sea brachiopods. Smithsonian Contributions to Palaeobiology 11: 1-25.
  • Cooper GA. 1973. Vema's brachiopoda (recent). Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology 17: 1-51.
  • Cooper GA. 1982. New brachiopods from the Southern Hemisphere and Cryptopora from Oregon (Recent). Smithsonian Contributions to Paleobiology 41: 1-43.
  • Cooper GA, Lee DE. 1993. Calloria, a replacement name for the recent brachiopod genus Waltonia from New Zealand. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand 257-270.
  • Cusack M, Walton D, Curry GB. 1997. Shell biochemistry. In: Kaesler RL, ed. Treatise on invertebrate paleontology, Vol. 1. Part H, Brachiopoda, revised. Boulder, CO and Lawrence, KS: Geological Society of America and University of Kansas, 243-266.
  • Drummond AJ, Ho SYW, Phillips MJ, Rambaut A. 2006. Relaxed phylogenetics and dating with confidence. PLoS Biology 4: e88.
  • DuBois HM. 1916. Variation induced in brachiopods by environmental conditions. Puget Sound Marine Station Publications 1: 177-183.
  • Foster MW. 1974. Recent antarctic and sub-antarctic brachiopods. Antarctic Research Series 21: 1-181.
  • Foster MW. 1989. Brachiopods from the extreme South Pacific and adjacent waters. Journal of Palaeontology 63: 268-301.
  • Gascuel O. 1997. BIONJ: an improved version of the NJ algorithm based on a simple model of sequence data. Molecular Biology and Evolution 14: 685-695.
  • Gaspard D, Marie B, Luquet G, Marin F. 2008. (for 2007). Biochemical characteristics of the soluble organic matrix from the shell of three recent terebratulid brachiopod species. Earth and Environmental Sciences Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 98: 269-275.
  • Gradstein FM, Ogg JG, Smith AG, 37 others. 2004. A geologic time scale, 2004. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Griffiths HJ, Barnes DKA, Linse K. 2009. Towards a generalized biogeography of the Southern Ocean benthos. Journal of Biogeography 36: 162-177.
  • Harper EM, Peck LS, Hendry KR. 2009. Patterns of shell repair in articulate brachiopods indicate size constitutes a refuge from predation. Marine Biology 156: 1993-2000.
  • Hausdorf B, Helmkampf M, Nesnidal MP, Bruchhaus I. 2009. Phylogenetic relationships within the lophophorate lineages (Ectoproctsa, Brachiopoda and Phoronida). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 55: 1121-1127. 10.1016/ j.ympev.2009.12.022.
  • Helmkampf M, Bruchhaus I, Hausdorf B. 2008. Phylogenetic analyses of lophophorates (brachiopods, phoronids, bryozoans) confirm the Lophotrochozoa concept. Proceedings of the Royal Society, B 275: 1927-1933.
  • Huson DH, Bryant D. 2006. Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Molecular Biology and Evolution 23: 254-267.
  • Kaesler RL ed. 1997-2007. Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology Brachiopoda, Parts H1-6, revised, 1-3226. Boulder, Colorado and Lawrence, Kansas: Geological Society of America and University of Kansas.
  • Kidwell SM. 2005. Shell composition has no net impact on large-scale evolutionary pattern in mollusks. Science 307: 914-917.
  • Krause RA. 2004. An assessment of morphological fidelity in the sub-fossil record of a Terebratulide brachiopod. Palaios 19: 460-476.
  • Laird MG, Bradshaw JD. 2004. The break-up of a long-term relationship: the Cretaceous separation of New Zealand from Gondwana. Gondwana Research 7: 273-286.
  • Lawver LA, Gahagan LM, Coffin MF. 1992. The development of seaways around Antarctica. Antarctic Research Series 56: 7-30.
  • Lee DE, MacKinnon DI, Smirnova TN, Baker PG, Boucot AJ, Yu-Gan J, Dong-Li S. 2006. Order Terebratulida. In: Kaesler RL, ed. Treatise on invertebrate paleontology. Part H5, Brachiopoda, revised. Boulder, CO and Lawrence, KS: Geological Society of America and University of Kansas, 1965-1993.
  • McCammon HM, Buchsbaum R. 1967. Size and shape variation of three recent brachiopods from the Strait of Magellan. Antarctic Research Series 11: 215-225.
  • Mallatt J, Craig CW, Yoder MJ. 2009. Nearly complete rRNA genes assembled from across the metazoan animals: Effects of more taxa, a structure-based alignment, and paired-sites evolutionary models on phylogeny reconstruction. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 55: 1-17.
  • Manceau M, Domingues VS, Linnen CR, Rosenblum EB, Hoekstra HE. 2010. Convergence in pigmentation at multiple levels: mutations, genes and function. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B 365: 2439-2450.
  • Moore J, Willmer P. 1997. Convergent evolution in invertebrates. Biological Reviews 72: 1-60.
  • Muir-Wood H. 1960. Homeomorphy in recent brachiopoda: Abyssothyris and Neorhynchia. Annals and Magazine of Natural History (Series 13) 3: 521-527.
  • Paps J, Baguna J, Riutort M. 2009. Bilaterian phylogeny: a broad sampling of 13 nuclear genes provides a new lophotrochozoan phylogeny and supports paraphyletic basal acoelomorphs. Molecular Biology and Evolution 26: 2397- 2406.
  • Paul CRC. 2009. The fidelity of the fossil record: the improbability of preservation. Palaeontology 52: 485-489.
  • Peck LS, Robinson K. 1994. Pelagic larval development in the brooding Antarctic brachiopod Liothyrella uva. Marine Biology 120: 279-286.
  • Posada D, Buckley TR. 2004. Model selection and model averaging in phylogenetics: advantages of Akaike information criterion and Bayesian approaches over likelihood ratio tests. Systematic Biology 53: 793-808.
  • Powell R. 2007. Is convergence more than an analogy? Homoplasy and its implications for macroevolutionary predictability. Biological Philosophy 22: 565-578.
  • Prud'homme B, Gompel N, Rokas A, Kassner VA, Williams TM, Yeh S-D, True JR, Carroll SB. 2006. Repeated morphological evolution through cis -regulatory changes in a pleiotropic gene. Nature 440: 1050-1053.
  • Robinson-Rechavi M, Huchon D. 2000. RRTREE: relativerate tests between groups of sequences on a phylogenetic tree. Nucleic Acids Research 16: 296-297.
  • Rudwick M. 1970. Living and fossil brachiopods. London: Hutchinson.
  • Saito M. 1998. Brachiopod phylogeny inferred from mitochondrial COI sequences. Tokyo University, PhD thesis. 1-109.
  • Saito M, Endo K. 2001. Molecular phylogeny and morphological evolution of laqueoid brachiopods. Paleontological Research 5: 87-100.
  • Saito M, Endo K, Cohen BL. 2001. Molecular phylogenetics and evolution of long-looped brachiopods. In: Brunton CHC, Cocks R, Long SL, eds. Brachiopods past and present. London: Taylor and Francis, 129-137.
  • Saito M, Kojima S, Endo K. 2000. Mitochondrial COI sequences of brachiopods: genetic code shared with protostomes; limits of utility for phylogenetic reconstruction. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 15: 331-344.
  • Santagata S, Cohen BL. 2009. Phoronid phylogenetics (Brachiopoda; Phoronata): evidence from morphological cladistics, small and large subunit rDNA sequences, and mitochondrial cox1. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 157: 34-50.
  • Sarashina I, Endo K. 2006. Skeletal matrix proteins of invertebrate animals: comparative analysis of their amino acid sequences. Paleontological Research 10: 311-336.
  • Sarashina I, Yamaguchi H, Haga T, Iijima M, Chiba S, Endo K. 2005. Molecular evolution and functionally important structures of molluscan dermatopontin: implications for the origins of molluscan shell matrix proteins. Journal of Molecular Evolution 20: 1-12.
  • Schumann D. 1991. Hydrodynamic influences in brachiopod shell morphology of Terebratalia transversa (Sowerby) from the San Juan Islands, USA. In: Mackinnon DI, Lee DE, Campbell JD, eds. Brachiopods through time. Rotterdam: Balkema, 265-271.
  • Shiino Y, Kuwazuru O, Yoshikawa N. 2009. Computational fluid dynamics simulations on a Devonian spiriferid Paraspirifer bownockeri (Brachiopoda): generating mechanism of passive feeding flows. Journal of Theoretical Biology 259: 132-141.
  • Sorensen MV, Hebsgaard MB, Heiner I, Glenner H, Willerslev E, Kristensen RM. 2008. New data from an enigmatic phylum: evidence from molecular sequence data supports a sister-group relationship between Loricifera and Nematomorpha. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 46: 231-239.
  • Stehli FG. 1965. Paleozoic Terebratulida. In: Moore RC, ed. Treatise on invertebrate paleontology. Part H, Brachiopoda. New York and Lawrence, KS: Geological Society of America & University of Kansas Press, 730-762.
  • Stevens GR. 1989. The nature and timing of biotic links between New Zealand and Antarctica in Mesozoic and early Cretaceous times. In: Crame JA, ed. Origins and evolution of the Antarctic biota. Bath: The Geological Society, 141-166.
  • Swofford DL. 2000. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
  • Tomasovych A, Rothfus TA. 2005. Differential taphonomy of modern brachiopods (San Juan Islands, Washington State): effects of intrinsic factors on damage and community-level abundance. Lethaia 38: 271-292.
  • Voros A. 2010. Escalation reflected in ornamentation and diversity history of brachiopod clades during the Mesozoic marine revolution. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 291: 474-480.
  • Williams A. 1968. Evolution of the shell structure of articulate brachiopods. Special Papers in Palaeontology 2: 1-55.
  • Williams A. 1997. Shell structure. In: Kaesler RL, ed. Treatise on invertebrate paleontology. Part H1, Brachiopoda, revised. Lawrence, KS: Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, 267-320.
  • Williams A, Brunton CHC. 1997. Morphological and anatomical terms applied to brachiopods. In: Kaesler RL, ed. Treatise on invertebrate paleontology. Part H1, Brachiopoda, revised. Lawrence, KS: Geological Society of America and University of Kansas Press, 423-440.
  • Wray GA. 2009. The evolutionary significance of cis - regulatory mutations. Nature Reviews, Genetics 8: 206-211.